Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF)
Newby, Ruth
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
28 Apr 2022
- Inspectors verified
Susan King
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
322264
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The childminder's poor teaching results in children making poor progress in their learning. p.2
- Significant weaknesses in practice mean that children's welfare is not promoted effectively. p.2
- Children's learning and development needs are not met. p.2
- However, the childminder does not implement the strategies she describes and children make poor progress. p.2
- Fences and decking in the garden are in very poor repair. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families3
“Parents and carers report that children enjoy coming to the provision.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 987
- about usual (typical 899)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 54, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 1%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
The provision is inadequate
Significant weaknesses in practice mean that children's welfare is not promoted effectively. The childminder does not follow her safeguarding policy when children arrive at the setting with existing injuries. She does not supervise children effectively. For example, toddlers with toast in their hands and mouths run about out of her sight. This poses a risk of choking. The childminder does not keep a record of every child's attendance as required. She does not identify and address risks to children's safety on her premises. The trunk and branches of a felled tree take up large parts of the garden. A long, sharp, sturdy branch sticks out into the footpath at toddlers' head height. A heavy trolley is stored insecurely on the sloping roof of a low-level wood store. Children are not safe.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Children's learning and development needs are not met. The childminder plans inappropriate activities that do not take account of what children are ready to learn next. The childminder knows that COVID-19 restrictions limited children's social interactions. She states her intention to help children to learn to speak. However, the childminder does not implement the strategies she describes and children make poor progress. Toddlers spend considerable periods of time seated in high chairs. This is despite them showing obvious interest in toys that they want to go and play with. This does not promote children's exploration and self-motivated learning. The childminder does not communicate consistent expectations for children's conduct. This does not promote children's confidence and self-control.
p.2
need to do better?
n The childminder does not identify weaknesses in her practice. Fences and decking in the garden are in very poor repair. The paving outside the patio doors is broken and some sections are missing. Items, such as logs, a wooden pallet and plastic bags of topsoil, are stacked and stored in an unstable way. Children, therefore, play in a hazardous environment. n The childminder does not supervise children well enough. She does not see toddlers climbing on a table behind her. Children run into an adjacent room and fall over unnoticed. n The childminder does not record the days and hours of attendance of children whose attendance is occasional or arranged at short notice. This has the potential to compromise children's welfare, should accurate information about their whereabouts be required. n The highly qualified childminder does not use her knowledge of the learning and development requirements effectively. She plans activities that do not take
p.2
need to do better?
account of children's existing skills and knowledge. For example, the childminder asks young toddlers to look at written letters and say the sounds that they represent. Children try hard to please the childminder but her expectations of
p.2
need to do better?
28 April 2022 them are not realistic. The childminder's poor teaching results in children making poor progress in their learning. n The childminder knows that young children learn by exploring. However, she offers activities in a way that prevents children from doing this. This is demonstrated when she plans a painting activity. She dips toddlers' forefingers into paint and dabs them onto paper on the high chair table. Children follow her instructions and do this by themselves. The activity does not encourage children to explore the properties of paint, or to think and be creative. n The childminder's interactions with children do not promote their language development adequately. She puts toddlers' shoes onto their feet but her attention is elsewhere. She does not name items such as 'shoe' or 'foot'. This does not help children to extend their vocabulary. The childminder knows that singing nursery rhymes helps children to acquire language. She plays recordings
p.2
need to do better?
of them to children. However, the pace of the singing is too fast for children to pick out individual words, or to experience the richness of rhythm and rhyme. n The childminder does not teach children clear rules and routines. This means that they do not know her expectations for their behaviour. One impact of this is that the childminder leads or carries children to where she wants them rather than offering an explanation. This does not promote children's self-control or understanding. Their confidence and sense of security is compromised. n Parents and carers report that children enjoy coming to the provision. The childminder provides daily written information about aspects of children's care, such as sleep times and food and drink. This helps everyone to work together to promote continuity in children's care.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Weaknesses in leadership and management mean that children's health and safety is not assured. The childminder refreshes and updates her safeguarding training. Overall, she demonstrates adequate knowledge of the signs and symptoms that indicate a child may be at risk of abuse and neglect. However, there are instances when the childminder does not follow her safeguarding policy regarding children's existing injuries. She does not work with parents to record accurate information about injuries that children sustain outside her provision. This does not help her to keep children safe. The childminder gathers required information about children before they begin to attend her provision. She knows how to contact parents in the case of an emergency.
p.3
Due date
follow the safeguarding policy, to ensure a swift response to signs that children are at risk of abuse or neglect 13/05/2022
p.4
Due date
use risk assessment effectively to identify any potential risks to children's safety; take prompt steps to remove hazards to children in the garden 13/05/2022
p.4
Due date
ensure that children are adequately supervised 13/05/2022
p.4
Due date
maintain a daily record of every child's days and hours of attendance 13/05/2022
p.4
Due date
improve systems for managing children's behaviour. 13/05/2022
p.4
Due date
implement the learning and development requirements, so that children encounter a curriculum that promotes their good progress 13/05/2022
p.4
Due date
enable children to follow their own interests and make decisions about what they do 13/05/2022
p.4
Due date
improve knowledge and understanding of language development, in order to ensure that activities and interactions fully promote children's vocabulary and communication skills 13/05/2022
p.4
Due date
gain knowledge of how children learn to read, in order that early reading activities are appropriately sequenced and consistently worthwhile. 13/05/2022
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number 322264 Local authority Liverpool Inspection number 10237160 Type of provision Childminder
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 2 Date of previous inspection 6 June 2018
p.5
Information about this early years setting
The childminder registered in 1993 and lives in Liverpool. Her provision operates Monday to Friday, from 7.30am to 5pm, during school terms. The childminder holds a qualification at level 6. She provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.
p.5
Inspection activities
n We carried out this inspection as a result of a risk assessment, following information we received about the provider. n This was the first routine inspection the setting received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the setting. n The childminder spoke with the inspector about her plans for the day's activities. n Recent written feedback from parents was taken account of by the inspector. n The inspector observed interactions between the childminder and children. She spoke with children and evaluated their responses to activities. n Documents used in the childminder's setting were sampled by the inspector. The inspector checked evidence of the suitability of the childminder and members of her household aged 16 years and over.
p.5
Inspection activities
28 April 2022 We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
Inspection activities
28 April 2022 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion