Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

The Corbet School

Inspected 30 Mar 2022 · published 27 May 2022 · URN 137336

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Eddie Wilkes (lead), Steve Byatt

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    30 Mar 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Eddie Wilkes, Steve Byatt

  • Postcode verified

    SY4 2AX

  • Name on report verified

    The Corbet School

  • URN verified

    137336

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+44Positivemore positive than 40% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongoutstandingthriveflourishingeffectivevery wellproudambitious
Criticismconcernsnot alwaysseriousconcerninconsistentgapsnot happylower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1080w+46
  • Safeguarding96w+14

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,174
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Plain English
Flesch 62, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
2
typical 4
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Safeguarding 6%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: The Corbet School Eyton Lane, Baschurch, Shrewsbury, Shropshire SY4 2AX

p.1

Outcome

The Corbet School continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The Corbet School provides a happy and kind environment where pupils thrive. Pupils say that staff are friendly and approachable. They feel safe and trust staff to help them if they have a problem. Behaviour is good and bullying is rare. If it does occur, staff deal with it well.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders, want the best for every pupil. They have designed an ambitious curriculum which is broad and balanced. Teachers deliver the curriculum well. Lessons are thoughtfully planned. Pupils say that work is challenging, and teachers help them to do their best. As a result, pupils are achieving well.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school offers pupils a wide range of extra-curricular opportunities. Examples include sports, art, astronomy, chess and drama clubs. Attendance at these activities is flourishing, with many pupils keen to get involved. For example, large numbers of pupils were seen participating in auditions for the current school production, ‘Into the Woods’.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The vast majority of parents and carers would recommend the school. They praise the quality of teaching and pastoral support. Many comment that their children were well supported through the COVID-19 pandemic. One parent summed up the views of many by saying ‘I could not be happier, and neither could my child.’

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Leaders know their school well. They have an accurate view of the school’s many strengths, while being determined to make improvements where they are needed. Leaders work well with governors, who provide an effective balance of support and challenge.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Leaders have thought carefully about the subjects that pupils study. All pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), follow a broad and balanced range of subjects at key stage 3. At key stage 4, the curriculum has an 29 and 30 March 2022

p.1

2

academic core, including French or Spanish for most pupils. Alongside this, leaders have maintained a diverse range of GCSEs and vocational options. For example, pupils can choose to study music, drama and engineering. Parents and pupils appreciate the range of subjects on offer.

p.2

2

Teachers have strong subject knowledge which they use to plan effectively. They check pupils’ understanding and give useful verbal and written feedback. However, there is some variability in how well teachers check that pupils use this feedback to improve their work. Strong practice was seen in science, where pupils are expected to respond to ‘what do you think’ tasks. This works well for pupils, ensuring that teachers are able to spot gaps in their knowledge. However, in some subjects systems are not as well developed. As a result, pupils do not routinely use feedback to improve their work.

p.2

2

The special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) and their team of teaching assistants know SEND pupils very well. They plan a wide range of interventions to support pupils, such as early morning reading and numeracy support. Pupils appreciate this support and were proud to show inspectors how it had helped them to improve. The SEND team works closely with pupils and their families to identify how to best support pupils’ learning. This information is shared with teachers through pupils’ ‘one page profiles’. Most teachers use these to adapt their planning for SEND pupils. However, some teachers do not fully take these into account when planning lessons. Consequently, some SEND pupils find it difficult to access learning in some lessons.

p.2

2

The schools ‘life skills’ curriculum is thoughtfully planned. Pupils learn about issues such as keeping themselves safe and valuing diversity. Every pupil receives independent careers advice and completes a one-week work experience in Year 10. Pupils are encouraged to make positive contributions to the school community. They respond well to this encouragement. For example, a group of pupils has set up a used uniform shop to keep the cost of uniform down. Another pupil has planned and led assemblies to raise awareness of racial discrimination.

p.2

2

Staff say that they are proud to work in the school and feel that it is well led and managed. They feel that leaders trust them and take their workload into account when planning improvements.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.2

Safeguarding

Leaders have ensured that the school has a strong culture of safeguarding. All staff complete regular safeguarding training. Safeguarding concerns are quickly identified and followed up. Leaders work with families and a range of agencies to put additional support in place where it is needed.

p.2

Safeguarding

Pupils say that they are taught how to stay safe. They are confident that there is always an adult in school that they can talk to if they have a concern and that they will get the support they need. 29 and 30 March 2022

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Some teachers do not make full use of the information they receive in the ‘one page profiles’ detailing how to support pupils with SEND. As a result, lessons are not always adapted to take the learning needs of SEND pupils into account. Leaders should ensure that all teachers use the information in the ‘one page profile’ to plan lessons which support the learning of SEND pupils.  Pupils’ response to teacher feedback is inconsistent between departments and lessons. Consequently, pupils do not always use this feedback to improve their knowledge and understanding. Leaders should ensure that pupils respond to teacher feedback to develop their knowledge in all subjects.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good/outstanding. This is called a section 8 inspection of a good or outstanding school, because it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on a section 8 inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a section 5 inspection. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the section 8 inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the section 8 inspection as a section 5 inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second section 8 inspection since we judged the school to be good on 6 June 2013.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted . 29 and 30 March 2022

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 29 and 30 March 2022

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10211432 Type of school Secondary Comprehensive

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Chair of governing body Mrs Helen Scarisbrick

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 15 February 2017, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school uses part-time alternative provision for a small number of pupils at three alternative provision providers.  The school meets the requirements of the Baker Clause, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation.  Inspectors met with the headteacher and other senior leaders. Meetings were held with curriculum leaders and the SENCo. Inspectors also met with a range of other staff and governors.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: Mathematics, science and humanities. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, looked at 29 and 30 March 2022

p.5

6

curriculum plans, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors visited a range of other lessons and activities outside the deep dive subjects. These included: French, Spanish and religious education lessons, literacy and numeracy support sessions and extra-curricular activities.  Inspectors scrutinised a range of safeguarding information, including the school’s safeguarding policy, spoke to staff and pupils about safeguarding and looked at how pupils learn how to keep themselves safe. The lead inspector spoke to the safeguarding leader about the reporting and recording of any safeguarding incidents.  Inspectors took account of the free-text comments and the responses on Parent View, Ofsted’s online inspection questionnaire. Inspectors also considered the responses to the pupil and staff surveys.

p.6

Inspection team

Eddie Wilkes, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Steve Byatt Ofsted Inspector 29 and 30 March 2022

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion