Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Weston Junior Academy
Summary
Alun Williams (lead), Rob Bourdon-Pierre
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
6 Apr 2022
- Inspectors verified
Alun Williams, Rob Bourdon-Pierre
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
ST3 6NG
- Name on report verified
Weston Junior Academy
- URN verified
143356
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance13
“They pass concerns to leaders, who deal with these appropriately.” p.3SEND & inclusion2
“Pupils with SEND make good progress.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 947
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 11 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Weston Junior Academy Princess Drive, Weston Coyney, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire ST3 6NG
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 5 and 6 April 2022
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are proud of their school. They enjoy learning and are keen to do well. The curriculum is planned effectively in all subjects, so pupils’ learning builds well from year to year. Pupils particularly enjoy reading because of the emphasis that staff place on it. The school’s corridors have attractive displays about books that capture pupils’ imagination.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school’s values run through everything that happens at Weston Junior Academy. Pupils know and understand them. For example, pupils understand why it is so important to have ‘empathy and respect’ for other people, especially those who are different from themselves.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils behave well in lessons and at other times of the day. They are polite, respectful and courteous. They trust staff to support them if they have any problems. For example, they know that bullying is not tolerated and that any that does happen will be dealt with well. Pupils feel safe and are safe in school.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The principal, leaders, staff and governors form a committed and united team. Together, they have brought about considerable improvement to all aspects of the school over recent years. Pupils now benefit from a good standard of education.
p.2
better?
The principal and senior leaders provide clear, strategic leadership. They carefully choose improvement actions based on evidence-based research. As a result, the school has improved considerably over recent years. Governors provide effective support and challenge to leaders. Trustees and trust staff have also played a full part in the school’s improvement.
p.2
better?
Leaders, supported by the trust, have made the development of staff a key priority. They have targeted training well. For example, all subjects are now led by enthusiastic subject experts. Subject leaders have clearly set out what they want pupils to learn and remember in each of their subjects.
p.2
better?
Leaders’ work to prioritise reading has proved very successful. Most pupils are enthusiastic readers. Staff have carefully chosen the books that pupils read in class. These texts engage and interest pupils. The well-stocked library is popular. Pupils talk about their favourite authors and genres. Leaders have also taken deliberate steps to widen pupils’ vocabulary. This has also proved successful. Pupils who find reading difficult are supported well. Staff provide regular, personalised support. These pupils make good progress towards becoming fluent readers.
p.2
better?
Mathematics is taught well throughout the school. The curriculum is appropriately sequenced, and teachers explain new content skilfully. Pupils develop good basic skills. They also learn to reason and explain their thinking when solving problems. 5 and 6 April 2022
p.2
3
Leaders have sensibly prioritised some subjects when putting their revised curriculum into practice. Initially, prioritised subjects were English, mathematics, science and computing. Religious education (RE) has recently been added to this list. The curriculum is delivered well in all these subjects.
p.3
3
Leaders have plans in place to fully develop all other subjects later this year. Some of these are delivered less effectively now. Teachers have less expertise and confidence in some foundation subjects. Consequently, they do not assess pupils’ learning as well as they do in other subjects. For example, they do not always identify and then address pupils’ errors and misconceptions.
p.3
3
Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are supported well. Their needs are quickly identified, and appropriate support is put in place. For example, teaching assistants provide skilful support for pupils in lessons. Pupils with SEND make good progress.
p.3
3
Pupils enjoy coming to school. Most attend very regularly. They demonstrate strong attitudes to learning. Behaviour has improved over recent years. Sanctions, such as suspension, are now used very rarely.
p.3
3
The school’s work to promote pupils’ wider development is effective. Some aspects are very strong. The development of pupils’ spirituality and morality is highly effective. The RE curriculum plays an important part in this, as does the broader curriculum and the school’s values that are lived out each day.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
The school has a strong culture of ensuring that pupils are safe and well cared for. Regular and effective training means that staff understand their safeguarding responsibilities. They are alert to the signs that pupils might need extra help. They pass concerns to leaders, who deal with these appropriately. Leaders ensure that pupils get the right support, making appropriate use of outside agencies.
p.3
Safeguarding
Pupils told inspectors that they feel safe and well looked after in school. Staff and parents and carers who spoke with inspectors concurred.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The implementation of the curriculum in some foundation subjects is less effective than in others. Staff have less expertise and confidence in these subjects. Consequently, they do not use assessment well. They do not always identify and address pupils’ misconceptions as well as they should. Leaders should ensure that all subjects are delivered to a consistently high standard. 5 and 6 April 2022
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 5 and 6 April 2022
p.4
School details
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.5
Information about this school
Weston Junior Academy converted to become an academy school in November 2017. At this time, it joined the St Bart’s Multi-Academy Trust. When its predecessor school, Weston Coyney Junior School, was last inspected by Ofsted, it was judged to require improvement. The principal took up her post on 1 September 2019. The school does not make any use of alternative providers.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school had received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders, and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors met with the principal and other senior leaders. They met with members of the local governing committee and the board of trustees, including 5 and 6 April 2022
p.5
6
the chairs of both groups. They also met with the chief executive officer (CEO) and the deputy CEO of St Bart’s Multi-Academy Trust. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics, science and RE. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors considered safeguarding by meeting with the principal, who is also the designated safeguarding lead. They scrutinised policies and records relating to child protection and examined the safeguarding checks made on staff before they join the school. Inspectors listened to pupils read and talked to them about their reading. Inspectors spoke with several members of staff. They considered the responses from staff to Ofsted’s online inspection questionnaire. Inspectors spoke informally with pupils at breaktime and lunchtime. They also
p.6
6
observed the school at these times. An inspector visited an assembly. Inspectors spoke with parents at the start of the day and considered the responses, including written responses, to Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire.
p.6
Inspection team
Alun Williams, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Rob Bourdon-Pierre Ofsted Inspector 5 and 6 April 2022
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion