Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Shiphay Learning Academy
Summary
Sue Costello (lead), Hilary Goddard, Kerri Conday
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
6 Apr 2022
- Inspectors verified
Hilary Goddard, Kerri Conday, Sue Costello
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
TQ2 7NF
- Name on report verified
Shiphay Learning Academy
- URN verified
136659
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 p.1
- Ofsted has not previously inspected Shiphay Learning Academy as an academy school under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 as, until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between inspections. p.1
- Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last inspection of the predecessor school. 5–6 April 2022 p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment11
“Leaders’ approach to assessment in some subjects is inconsistent.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,370
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 23%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Shiphay Learning Academy Exe Hill, Shiphay, Torquay, Devon TQ2 7NF
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Ofsted has not previously inspected Shiphay Learning Academy as an academy school under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 as, until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between inspections.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last inspection of the predecessor school. 5–6 April 2022
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The curriculum at Shiphay Learning Academy is typically broad and ambitious. However, leaders have not made sure that it meets the needs of all pupils well enough. They have not ensured that pupils build up knowledge over time in some subjects. Too many pupils, including some with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), do not achieve as well as they could.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Most pupils say they like their school. They say that staff sort out incidents of poor behaviour and occasional bullying. However, a few pupils feel that staff do not respond swiftly enough to help them to feel safe. A small proportion of parents also share these views. Staff do not use the school’s behaviour system consistently. This results in behaviour which does not meet leaders’ expectations. Leaders know that too many pupils do not attend school often enough, especially pupils with SEND and disadvantaged pupils. This hampers their learning.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils develop their confidence and resilience through a varied set of valuable experiences, such as performing plays, attending forest school and participating in poetry events. However, other important aspects of pupils’ personal development are not well considered in the curriculum design.
p.2
better?
Leaders’ actions to improve standards have been delayed, partly due to staffing changes and the COVID-19 pandemic. However, current monitoring activities do not provide leaders, including trustees, with precise and accurate information about standards at the school. Leaders’ evaluations are overgenerous. Consequently, trust leaders lack the information they need to hold staff to account to secure sustained improvement.
p.2
better?
In some subjects, leaders have identified the important knowledge they want pupils to know. For example, leaders have made changes to improve the mathematics curriculum after a decline in standards. However, teachers have not planned carefully the small steps required to build pupils’ knowledge each year. This means that pupils remember the activity rather than the knowledge and skills. Too often, including in mathematics and reading, staff do not support pupils with SEND well enough to learn the curriculum.
p.2
better?
Leaders have implemented a new reading curriculum to help pupils learn to read. In the early years, children read books that are matched to their ability as soon as they start school. The early years staff have prioritised developing children’s communication and language so that they grow their vocabulary ready for Year 1. However, the reading curriculum in key stage 1 is not supporting some pupils who are at the early stages of reading and writing. Staff do not deliver the school’s reading programme consistently and confidently. They lack the expertise they need to teach reading. Sometimes, they give books to pupils to read that are too easy or 5–6 April 2022
p.2
3
too difficult. Pupils who have fallen behind do not receive the help they need to read fluently, spell accurately or form letters carefully. In key stage 2, staff do not ensure that pupils, who remain at the early stages of reading, read books that inspire them. Some staff do not promote the importance of reading as well as they could.
p.3
3
In some subjects, such as history and music, leaders have not considered how best to identify gaps in pupils’ knowledge and skills. Teachers do not make suitable checks on what pupils know and understand. Pupils enjoy their learning in subjects, such as art and design, but they do not remember key knowledge consistently well. Similarly, staff in the early years have not given sufficient thought to checking some aspects of pupils’ development.
p.3
3
Staff identify the pastoral and health needs of pupils with SEND swiftly and work effectively with other professionals. However, pupils’ support plans do not contain the precise information that teachers need to adapt the curriculum. Teachers do not break learning down into the small steps that are sometimes required. These pupils find the curriculum too difficult and do not receive the help they need. Some pupils switch off and, occasionally, disturb the learning of their peers. Consequently, they fall further behind.
p.3
3
Leaders inspire pupils to participate in the arts. Pupils learn to play instruments, sing and dance. Leaders ensure that there is a ‘sport for everyone’. This can be a popular sport, such as football, or an alternative such as archery. However, leaders do not prepare all pupils well enough for life in modern Britain. Leaders are not aware that some pupils have a weak understanding of healthy relationships and have gaps in their knowledge of equality and diversity.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders have appropriate systems in place for vetting, checking and training new members of staff and volunteers in child protection. Staff use suitable systems to identify and manage concerns. Leaders make timely referrals and safeguarding leaders work well with a range of partners to help pupils and their families. Leaders have a secure understanding of pupils’ vulnerabilities.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Leaders have not prioritised the reading curriculum well enough. Too many pupils do not enjoy reading as much as they could. In part, this is because older pupils do not read books that interest them. Leaders must ensure that teachers help pupils to choose suitable books, consider pupils’ reading interests and adapt the curriculum accordingly. 5–6 April 2022
p.3
4
The intent of the school’s phonics programme is appropriate, but the implementation in key stage 1 is inconsistent. Some staff have not had the training they need to use the reading programme. They lack the subject knowledge and pedagogical understanding that they need to adapt the scheme to meet the needs of the weakest readers, including pupils with SEND. Leaders must ensure that all staff have the training and support that they need to teach reading well. The curriculum does not meet the needs of some pupils with SEND. Pupils’ individual support plans do not help teachers to make suitable adaptations to the curriculum. Some pupils do not receive the support they need to tackle difficult activities, so their behaviour deteriorates. Leaders must ensure that the information in pupils’ support plans is sufficiently detailed, and that teachers use this information to plan a curriculum that meets pupils’ precise needs.
p.4
4
Leaders’ approach to assessment in some subjects is inconsistent. Teachers do not make timely checks on what pupils have learned in some subjects. This means that teachers do not know precisely what knowledge and skills pupils have remembered. Leaders need to ensure teachers improve their use of assessment to accurately identify gaps in pupils’ understanding. Leaders need to ensure that all pupils come to school regularly. The rate of persistent absence is too high, especially for pupils with SEND and disadvantaged pupils. They miss too much of the curriculum and this slows their learning. Leaders need to establish more robust systems to improve pupils’ attendance quickly. Staff do not apply the school’s behaviour policy consistently. Staff use a variety of strategies and have different expectations. Some pupils are confused about what constitutes acceptable behaviour. Occasionally, this results in pupils disrupting the
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school. 5–6 April 2022
p.4
5
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 5–6 April 2022
p.5
School details
Inspection number 10211874 Type of school Primary
p.6
School details
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.6
Information about this school
The school joined Riviera Education Trust, a multi-academy trust, in September 2018. The school uses one alternative provider. Shiphay Learning Academy converted to become an academy school in February 2012. When its predecessor school, Shiphay School and Orchard Nursery, was last inspected by Ofsted, in October 2012, it was judged to be outstanding overall. The school provides Nursery provision for three-year-olds.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school had received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders, and have taken this into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors did deep dives in early reading, mathematics, art and design and music. This included discussions with subject leaders, lesson visits, looking at examples of work, discussions with teachers, discussions with pupils and listening 5–6 April 2022
p.6
7
to pupils read to an adult. An inspector considered some aspects of the history curriculum. Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, curriculum leaders, the SENCo, staff, the chief executive officer of the multi-academy trust, the chair of the board of trustees and the designated safeguarding leader. One inspector met with some parents at the start of the school day. The lead inspector had a telephone conversation with the chair of the local standards board. Inspectors scrutinised a range of documentation provided by the school, including leaders’ self-evaluation, development plans, minutes from the local standards board meetings, risk assessments and documentation relating to behaviour. Inspectors examined safeguarding records, checked staff’s safeguarding knowledge and spoke with pupils. Inspectors considered the 199 responses to the online survey, Ofsted Parent View, including written comments. They also took into consideration the
p.7
Inspection team
Sue Costello, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Hilary Goddard Ofsted Inspector 5–6 April 2022
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion