Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

Mary Hare School for the Deaf

Inspected 3 Mar 2022 · URN SC011137

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    3 Mar 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Jennie Christopher, Lee Kirwin, Peter Jackson

  • Helped and protected verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    RG14 3BQ

  • Name on report verified

    Mary Hare School for the Deaf

  • URN verified

    SC011137

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+17Mostly positivemore positive than 19% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositivestrongeffectivelyambitiousgood progresseffectivefeel safeconfident
Criticismconcernsnot alwayslackingat riskgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1346w+17
  • What needs to improve54w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,393
about usual (typical 1609)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 43
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 73%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential special school - Mary Hare School for the Deaf 1 Mary Hare School for the Deaf Mary Hare School, Arlington Manor, Snelsmore Common, Newbury, Berkshire RG14 3BQ Residential provision inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential special school

The school is a non-maintained special school providing education and accommodation for students aged five to 19 who have severe and profound hearing loss. The primary school is on a separate site and offers day and weekly boarding placements. The primary school has a boarding facility with bedrooms to suit the age profile of the school. The secondary school has six boarding houses. Year 7 has two dedicated boarding houses; Years 8 to 10 live in two larger boarding houses; Year 11 students live in a purpose-built boarding house; and the sixth form has four separate accommodation blocks of individual and shared study bedrooms.

p.1

Information about this residential special school

Due to COVID-19, at the request of the Secretary of State, we suspended all routine inspections of social care providers carried out under the social care common inspection framework (SCCIF) on 17 March 2020. We returned to routine SCCIF inspections on 12 April 2021.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and young people are helped and protected good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good

p.1

good

The residential special school provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

good

Date of previous inspection: 2 July 2019

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: good Inspection report for residential special school - Mary Hare School for the Deaf 2

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children have a positive experience staying in the residential provision of the school. They say that residential has led to them having friends they did not have previously. Children have good relationships with staff, who they feel think about their needs and recognise if they are feeling sad or down. Staff continued to offer support during COVID-19 restrictions. This has been described by a social worker as a ‘lifeline’ for some children. One child said of this period, ‘The school staff saved my life.’

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children’s voices are evident throughout much of the planning in the residential provision. This includes choosing activities, sharing their views on menus and who they can share rooms with. The head of care spends time seeking children’s views in addition to using other forums across the school, such as pupil voice. However, it was noted that the views of children who take longer to communicate, or have more complex communication needs, are not as readily sought. This means that some groups of children are not always having the opportunity to share their views and ideas.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children all attend education. Joint working between education and residential staff means that there is consistency in the approach to meeting children’s needs throughout the day. After-school prep allows children the time to complete homework with staff support as needed. The on-site youth club ‘Coles Diner’ is a firm favourite, where children socialise, buy snacks and learn employment skills. The range of activities on offer has not fully returned to those available before the COVID-19 restrictions, despite national restrictions changing. The older students have found this to be a challenge as they do not necessarily want to engage in the on-site activities.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children who are accessing the residential provision for the first time are supported. Staff ensure that there are visits for children to meet staff and some other children before their first stay. Joint working with their previous school, professionals and parents or carers means that staff have the key information needed to start to care for the child. Children who are moving on to colleges, university or employment are supported with applications and interview techniques, as well as learning key life skills such as making meals and socialising.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children’s emotional and physical health needs are met. There are strong links with child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS), including specialist Deaf CAMHS professionals. There are also strong links with speech and language and occupational therapy support. The health and well-being team provides a joined-up approach to meeting children’s needs, ensuring that there is no repetition or any gaps in children’s plans. Medication is stored appropriately in the residential houses and, when they are able, children administer their own medications. Staff training in specific health needs is thorough. This ensures that staff know what to do if children are unwell. However, the oversight of medication storage and administration in the Inspection report for residential special school - Mary Hare School for the Deaf 3 houses is lacking. For example, there are fewer stock checks and no regular assessments of staff competency to administer medication. This could lead to

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Children say they feel safe while in the residential accommodation and across the school. Some children say that since being at the school it is the first time they have not been bullied and that it is good to be with other students who understand them. All can identify staff they would go to if upset. However, children do not always have access to someone in the evenings who uses sign if this is their preferred method of communication.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Staff are aware of children’s vulnerabilities and can recognise when children are at risk. The systems in place that identify safeguarding concerns, in particular the online reporting and recording system, have helped staff to feel more confident in reporting concerns and knowing that they have been responded to. Staff felt they were involved and included in the decision-making regarding safeguarding concerns they had raised.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Children do not directly say that bullying is an issue in the school. However, parents and children’s surveys suggest bullying does happen in the school. Leaders are not demonstrating enough curiosity in understanding what this means. However, children say the bullying is dealt with effectively and that staff will always help.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Partnership work is a strength, with appropriate challenge to partner agencies as required. This ensures that children’s needs are met effectively. Liaison and support from specialist agencies, such as drug or alcohol services, ensures that children are educated in the risks rather than, if there is an issue, taking a punitive approach to what may be an indicator of a wider issue. Children with additional emotional well- being concerns, such as self-injurious behaviours, are well supported through the school’s links with CAMHS, in addition to the therapeutic support on site.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Children are protected from avoidable risks, while being given the opportunity to have the same opportunities as other similar-aged children. Risk assessments are clear about the potential hazards for the child, and the recent development of the risk assessment tool is particularly positive as staff are finding it much easier to use. Children are protected through regular checks of the firefighting systems and personal evacuation plans are easily accessible. Safer recruitment practice, including pre-employment checks, ensures that children are not cared for by unsuitable people.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Leaders are ambitious for the children at the school. Parents and social workers are positive about the difference being at the school has made to children’s lives. The Inspection report for residential special school - Mary Hare School for the Deaf 4 development of the new primary school is an ambitious project looking to house all services on one site, providing a whole-school approach.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The profile of the residential provision has been raised as it is recognised as an essential aspect of the school. The residential management team is being reorganised and the appointment of a new director of care increases the emphasis on the importance of the residential provision. The deputy head has an impressive knowledge about the children. Staff are optimistic about his impending headship.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Children are accepted for their diverse cultures and identities. This helps them to develop confidence, where this was lacking when they attended other schools. Plans are much clearer now about the child’s identity, including how they feel about their deafness and what is important to them. Children are making good progress. The implementation of new plans is helping to record and celebrate this. There are some gaps though, where new information has not been added to plans when it has emerged. Partnership working is recognised by senior staff to help in the stability of children in their placements.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Residential staff say that they feel respected by senior leaders and that they play an important role in the school. Staff have regular supervision and feel they can approach senior staff with ideas and these will be listened to. Staff work effectively as a team across all shifts, with night staff feeling that they are also involved in any decisions made. Staff have access to the training they need to meet children’s specific health needs.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Governance and oversight are sound. The use of an independent visitor to monitor the residential provision provides professional challenge and a critical friend approach. This has led to the continued development of the provision and of the service provided. Inspection report for residential special school - Mary Hare School for the Deaf 5

p.4

Recommendations

 Review the policy regarding oversight of medication in each house. In addition, consider the frequency with which staff’s competency to handle medication is reassessed.  Ensure that reasonable adjustments are made so that all children’s views are recognised and considered.  Demonstrate an appropriate level of curiosity when there are indicators of bullying.

p.5

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential special school - Mary Hare School for the Deaf 6

p.5

Residential special school details

Social care unique reference number: SC011137

p.6

Residential special school details

Headteacher/teacher in charge: Peter Gale

p.6

Residential special school details

Type of school: Residential special school

p.6

Inspectors

Jennie Christopher, Social Care Inspector (lead) Lee Kirwin, Social Care Inspector Peter Jackson, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for residential special school - Mary Hare School for the Deaf 7 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspectors

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspectors

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspectors

T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion