Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Whitecross Hereford
Summary
Claire Price (lead), Heather Simpson
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
3 Feb 2022
- Inspectors verified
Claire Price, Heather Simpson
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
HR4 0RN
- Name on report verified
Whitecross Hereford
- URN verified
139189
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Inspectors found no evidence that pupils had been adversely affected, but this lack of vigilance does put pupils at risk of potential harm. p.2
- However, this is not consistent in all areas of the school’s work and so leaders do not always take the right steps to correct weaknesses in the school. p.3
- The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. p.3
- There are serious omissions in safer recruitment practices at the school. p.3
- The school’s arrangements for safer recruitment are not effective. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders should evaluate the effectiveness of their systems to manage and improve behaviour and amend them as needed in order to reduce the number of suspensions and exclusions in the school. p.4
- They have identified what pupils need to know and have divided this knowledge into ‘small steps’. p.2
- As a matter of urgency, leaders should put systems and processes in place so that all safeguarding requirements are met and ensure that these systems are properly maintained from then on. p.3
- The governing body should take 2 and 3 February 2022 p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,090
- shorter than usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Whitecross Hereford Three Elms Road, Hereford, Herefordshire HR4 0RN
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Inadequate Previous inspection grade Good 2 and 3 February 2022
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Staff have high expectations of pupils. Most pupils live up to the school’s motto of ‘excellence for all, excellence from all’, and they do well. This is especially the case for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). However, the number of pupils who are suspended has historically been high and shows no sign of reducing.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils say that bullying rarely happens. Staff intervene effectively if it does occur. A group of pupils, called ‘I Am’, promote diversity and equality. As a result of their work, the school supports ‘period poverty’. There is a wide selection of extra- curricular opportunities for pupils. Pupils enjoy a range of sporting activities and regularly compete in competitions and tournaments. Pupils can take part in different clubs, including a science and debating club. Leaders have introduced more clubs this year, and pupils welcome these opportunities.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils told inspectors that they feel safe in the school. However, leaders have not made sure that the necessary checks have been made on all adults at the school. Inspectors found no evidence that pupils had been adversely affected, but this lack of vigilance does put pupils at risk of potential harm.
p.2
better?
Leaders have developed a well-planned and well-sequenced curriculum. They have identified what pupils need to know and have divided this knowledge into ‘small steps’. In some subjects, such as mathematics, teachers use these small steps well to make sure that pupils learn and remember the most important information. Teachers have good subject knowledge and choose their teaching methods carefully. In most subjects, teachers use assessment well, which helps them make sure that the work they provide matches pupils’ needs. As a result, pupils can recall and build on their learning.
p.2
better?
Leaders have clear systems to identify and meet the needs of pupils with SEND. They share useful information with teachers. The teaching assistants support them well in lessons. Pupils with SEND achieve well.
p.2
better?
Leaders and staff have high expectations of behaviour in lessons and around the school. Most pupils know and follow the behaviour policy. Leaders have identified some pupils who would benefit from changes to their curriculum. They have started to use alternative placements to help pupils to remain engaged in their education. For example, some pupils attend Bright Stars, a boxing provision, one day each week. Despite this, the number of suspensions and permanent exclusions are high and are not decreasing. Too many pupils are suspended from school repeatedly. Leaders have not taken decisive action to remedy this.
p.2
better?
Pupils’ personal development is prioritised. The curriculum for relationships, sex and health education covers a wide range of appropriate topics. It is well planned and 2 and 3 February 2022
p.2
3
reflects the risks that pupils face in the local community. As part of this curriculum, specialist organisations provide expert knowledge on issues such as consent, safer relationships and careers. Careers education is developing appropriately, with plans in place to make sure that pupils know about the world of work. Leaders have established good relationships with local employers. These relationships are proving productive. Pupils, for instance, attend career fairs, participate in mock interviews and learn about different career pathways.
p.3
3
Leaders take account of teacher workload, and staff are positive about the support they receive from them. Leaders monitor some aspects of the school’s work well. However, this is not consistent in all areas of the school’s work and so leaders do not always take the right steps to correct weaknesses in the school. For example, leaders collect behaviour data but do not use this to evaluate how well their systems are working and make changes accordingly.
p.3
3
Members of the governing body are keen ambassadors for the school. They provide strong support for leaders. In some areas, they also provide an effective challenge. However, they are not aware of the detail contained within safeguarding statutory guidance. They have not ensured that they have conducted appropriate safeguarding checks on all governors. This is a clear breach of their responsibilities.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
There are serious omissions in safer recruitment practices at the school. Trust and school leaders have not assured themselves that all staff, governors and visiting staff have had the appropriate pre-employment or Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks. Leaders are not aware of all their statutory responsibilities relating to DBS and pre-employment checks and so do not recognise the importance of conducting them. Inspectors found no evidence that these omissions had adversely affected pupils, but it does put pupils at the risk of potential harm.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders have robust systems in place to safeguard pupils who are at risk. Leaders know their pupils well and are tenacious in securing the help that they need.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The school’s arrangements for safer recruitment are not effective. This means that leaders have not assured themselves that all adults that attend the school site are suitable to work with children. As a matter of urgency, leaders should put systems and processes in place so that all safeguarding requirements are met and ensure that these systems are properly maintained from then on. The governing body is not aware of all its statutory responsibilities. This means that they are unable to hold leaders to account. The governing body should take 2 and 3 February 2022
p.3
4
the necessary steps to ensure that they understand their duties in relation to the trust and the school and act accordingly. The numbers of suspensions and permanent exclusions are high, and leaders have not taken action to reduce them. This means that some pupils miss too much learning. Leaders should evaluate the effectiveness of their systems to manage and improve behaviour and amend them as needed in order to reduce the number of suspensions and exclusions in the school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 2 and 3 February 2022
p.4
School details
Website www.whitecross.hereford.sch.uk Date of previous inspection 21 February 2017, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school meets the requirements of the Baker Clause, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. The school is a single academy trust.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We deemed the inspection a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.5
Information about this inspection
In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.
p.5
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken this into account in their evaluation of the school. 2 and 3 February 2022
p.5
6
During the inspection, inspectors held discussions with the headteacher and other senior and middle leaders, including curriculum and pastoral leaders and the special educational needs coordinator. Inspectors held discussions with teachers and representatives of the trust. Inspectors carried out deep dives in mathematics, physical education and languages. For each of these subjects, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, carried out visits to lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to pupils and looked at some of their work. Inspectors met with members of staff individually and in groups and spoke to pupils at various points during the inspection. Inspectors took into account the response to the pupil and staff surveys, as well as Ofsted Parent View. An inspector visited the school isolation room and spent time talking to pupils there. Inspectors looked at records relating to behaviour, bullying, attendance and
p.6
6
safeguarding. Inspectors reviewed safeguarding arrangements by checking the school’s approach to staff’s recruitment, scrutinising policy documents and meeting with the designated safeguarding lead.
p.6
Inspection team
Claire Price, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Heather Simpson Her Majesty’s Inspector 2 and 3 February 2022
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion