Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Whitehill Primary School

Inspected 24 Mar 2022 · published 23 May 2022 · URN 140800

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Sue Child (lead), Anne Allen, Jonathan Shields, Tracy Good

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    24 Mar 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Anne Allen, Jonathan Shields, Sue Child, Tracy Good

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    DA12 5HN

  • Name on report verified

    Whitehill Primary School

  • URN verified

    140800

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+14Mostly positivemore positive than 40% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseambitiousenjoythriveeffectiveconsistentlyeffectivelyclearproud
Criticismconcernsconcernnot yetweaknessesat risklacksweakerfall behind

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1198w+20
  • Safeguarding100w−35
  • What needs to improve33w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,294
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 56
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%Safeguarding 5%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 28%

Full report text

Inspection of Whitehill Primary School Sun Lane, Gravesend, Kent DA12 5HN

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good 23 and 24 March 2022

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy their time at school. They are proud to belong, polite and helpful. Children settle into the early years quickly and thrive.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Staff care deeply about pupils. One said, ‘It is all about the children.’ Pupils say they feel safe and that staff help them to sort out their concerns, including about bullying.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

During lessons, inspectors noted that the school was calm, and pupils behaved well. However, at social times, a number of key stage 2 pupils are boisterous. A small minority of the school community has concerns about pupils’ behaviour.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The curriculum is not broad enough or ambitious enough about what pupils will learn. It is not planned sufficiently well to enable pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), to acquire the knowledge they need for their next steps in education. This academic year, the curriculum has been narrowed for some pupils and they have not learned subjects such as music and modern foreign languages.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Turbulence in leadership in recent times has meant that many planned developments did not take place. The recently appointed headteacher has an accurate view of the school’s strengths and areas to improve. She has already begun to secure improvements.

p.2

better?

Leaders have not established a sufficiently coherent and ambitious curriculum. The recently appointed headteacher recognises that the curriculum lacks scope and ambition.

p.2

better?

In mathematics and English, teachers are clear about what pupils are expected to learn and remember. The curriculum in these subjects is designed to build pupils’ learning sequentially towards identified endpoints. Teaching staff deliver the mathematics and English curriculum competently and assess pupils’ progress regularly. Most pupils do well in reading and mathematics.

p.2

better?

The wider curriculum is less well developed than in English and mathematics. Leaders have not provided advice on how to use teaching materials to support pupils’ learning in the wider subjects, including science, arts and humanities. Consequently, teaching does not build on pupils’ previous knowledge and skills well enough. Teaching staff are not yet finding out exactly what pupils have previously learned to identify and close any gaps in knowledge. Consequently, the current wider curriculum does not prepare pupils sufficiently well for their next stage of education. 23 and 24 March 2022

p.2

3

Pupils with SEND are not being supported well enough, especially in key stage 2. Staff have not identified or provided the exact support pupils need to make successful next steps in learning. However, leaders have made SEND provision a priority for improvement. Teachers have had recent training to help them adapt their teaching to support pupils with SEND. It is too early to see the impact of this work.

p.3

3

The early years foundation stage is a strength of the school. It is a nurturing and welcoming environment. The curriculum is ambitious and stimulating. Skilful teaching staff provide a positive learning experience for children. Children grow in their independence and skills. They have a joyful experience in the early years and learn well.

p.3

3

The early reading curriculum is planned well. Effective staff training in the teaching of phonics ensures consistency across Reception Year and key stage 1. Pupils have plenty of opportunities to practise their skills by reading books that match the sounds they know. Most pupils at key stage 2 enjoy reading and visit the well- stocked library regularly. Weaker readers in key stage 2 are less enthusiastic about reading. This is because staff are not as adept at supporting pupils in key stage 2 who fall behind in reading.

p.3

3

The recently appointed headteacher has worked with the school community to raise expectations for pupils’ behaviour and conduct. This work has already had an impact on improving pupils’ behaviour, especially during lesson times. Leaders still have work to do to ensure that all staff are supported in managing pupils’ behaviour consistently, including during social times.

p.3

3

Pupils learn how to keep themselves safe and healthy. The school provides a range of clubs and extra-curricular activities. Regular assemblies help pupils to understand right and wrong and to reflect on the consequences of their actions. Leaders are currently improving the personal, social and health education curriculum with more emphasis given to teaching pupils about fundamental British values and the promotion of equality issues.

p.3

3

Until recently, weaknesses in governance and leadership meant that statutory requirements have not been met consistently. For example, leaders have not consulted with parents about the school’s relationships and sex education policy. However, governance has strengthened considerably in recent months. The trust and local governing body members are determined to provide helpful challenge and support to school leaders.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Regular training ensures that staff know how to identify signs that pupils are at risk. The designated safeguarding leads have good links with agencies, such as children’s services. They make sure that pupils that are a cause for concern are supported well. Leaders keep detailed records of safeguarding issues and any actions taken. 23 and 24 March 2022

p.3

4

Leaders make sure that all required safeguarding checks are completed when recruiting staff. Some of the suitability of management checks on the governing body were not in place fully. This was rectified easily during the inspection.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The current curriculum is not planned and sequenced so that new knowledge and skills build on what has been taught before. The endpoints that the curriculum is building toward are not clear. Pupils need to know more and remember more of the intended curriculum. Leaders have started to revisit the vision for the curriculum, although it is in its infancy. Leaders should ensure that there are clear curriculum plans to support teaching.  Teaching does not identify or meet the needs of pupils with SEND well enough. Staff have not received sufficient training to enable them to support pupils’ learning effectively. Leaders should make sure that pupils’ additional needs are identified accurately. They should ensure that actions required to help pupils with SEND are shared with teaching staff and parents. In this way, pupils with SEND will be helped more effectively and communication with parents will improve.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Not all pupils’ behaviour at social times is yet as it should be. Consequently, some of the school community report that pupils’ behaviour is a concern. Leaders are currently relaunching the behaviour policy. Leaders should make sure that all staff are supported to manage behaviour consistently so that the behaviour of pupils continues to improve. This is so that all the school community have every confidence that pupils’ misbehaviour is tackled well.  The trust and the local governing body have not yet developed a reliable system to find out whether all statutory requirements are met or how well the wider curriculum is covered. Governors should establish a robust and reliable system for holding leaders to account for the school’s work. This should include the use of a clear improvement plan showing the intended outcomes of leaders’ actions. This is so that governors are kept well informed and can challenge and support leaders

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school. 23 and 24 March 2022

p.4

5

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.5

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.5

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 23 and 24 March 2022

p.5

School details

Website www.whitehillprimary.com Date of previous inspection 18 January 2017, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.6

Information about this school

 Two interim headteachers have been in post between October 2021 and February 2022. The substantive headteacher had been in post for four weeks at the time of the inspection.  A new chair of the local governing body was appointed in November 2021.  The school does not use any alternative providers.  This was the first section 5 inspection since the school converted to an academy in 2014.

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.6

Information about this inspection

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. 23 and 24 March 2022

p.6

7

 Inspectors met with the headteacher, senior leaders, staff and pupils. The lead inspector spoke with the chair of trustees, the chief executive officer and the chair of the local governing body.  To investigate the quality of education, inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics, art and science. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors looked at curriculum plans in other subjects and spoke to leaders about the wider curriculum.  The inspectors viewed the website and looked at a number of policies and documents.  Inspectors considered the views of staff, parents and pupils expressed in Ofsted’s online surveys. They also met parents at the school gate.  To inspect safeguarding, the lead inspector checked the single central record of

p.7

7

recruitment checks and other safeguarding records. Inspectors also talked to leaders in charge of safeguarding, a range of staff and pupils.

p.7

Inspection team

Sue Child, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Tracy Good Ofsted Inspector 23 and 24 March 2022

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion