Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Further education inspection (EIF)

Royal Deaf Education Trust

Inspected 17 Mar 2022 · published 23 May 2022 · URN 132001

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    17 Mar 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Esther Williams, Louise Rowley, Tina Pagett, Tracey Griffin

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Name on report verified

    The Deaf Academy

  • URN verified

    132001

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+17Mostly positivemore positive than 61% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveambitiouspositivestrongwell-plannedhigh qualityfeel safeenjoy
Criticismnot yetconcernslow expectationsnot effectivenot alwayslimitedyet toslow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspectionSafeguarding positive critical
  • Findings1115w+9
  • Safeguarding165w−20
  • What needs to improve216w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,457
about usual (typical 1228)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 40
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
7
typical 5
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 57%Safeguarding 8%What needs to improve 11%About the inspection 23%

Full report text

Further education and skills inspection report

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires Improvement

The quality of education Requires Improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires Improvement Provision for learners with high needs Requires Improvement Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires Improvement

p.1

Information about this provider

The Deaf Academy includes a school for pupils aged 5 to 18 and a college for students aged 16 and over. Both the school and college are based in a purpose-built site in Exmouth. The vast majority of students are profoundly deaf and use British sign language as their first language. Many students have additional needs which are barriers to learning.

p.1

Information about this provider

All students have an education, health and care (EHC) plan and study individual programmes. The college offers day and residential provision. At the time of the visit, 38 students attended the college, 16 of which are aged 19 to 25 years, and a further 22 students aged 16 to 18 are funded and inspected as part of the school provision. 15 to 17 March 2022

p.1

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Learners feel safe and enjoy their time at college.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Learners appreciate the calm learning environment and proactive approach to promote good behaviour and attitudes to learning. For example, in sessions which are well organised, learners worked well and were keen to explain their understanding. Learners’ interaction with staff and peers are positive and learners support each other well during activities.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Learners value the strong ethos placed on being part of the deaf community that supports them to develop their deaf identity. For many students, this is the first time they have not felt isolated in an educational setting. Instead, they are proud to be part of a community with a shared identity that equips them well with strategies to manage their hearing loss in the community.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Learners are encouraged to be active citizens in their local community. For example, learners take part in raising awareness of the British sign language (BSL) bill locally and nationally. They have co-developed a deaf awareness information pack for local employers to support their understanding of what it means to be deaf.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Learners benefit from a wide range of extra-curricular activities, such as visits to local places of interest, sport and theatrical clubs. However, participation in voluntary enrichment activities is low and there are more limited opportunities for day students. In addition, a few students would like more activities that are specifically designed for college students to participate.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Learners receive effective careers guidance through weekly sessions where they explore their career options. As a result, most students are aware of their next steps and are developing employability skills through internal or external work placements. However, a few students have yet to explore their next steps and what they need to do to begin this transition.

p.2

better?

Leaders have high aspirations for students to achieve the language, confidence and skills they need to progress to work or supported living. They recognise that there has previously been a culture of low expectations at the college. As such, they have focused on developing the curriculum intent to meet the changing needs of learners. However, although there have been significant changes, the pace of implementing improvements to the quality of the vocational and academic education since the previous inspection has not been rapid enough.

p.2

better?

Leaders have developed a curriculum that is broadly structured to reflect their ambitions for learners. Where teachers have interpreted and understood this well, learners gain new knowledge and skills to prepare them for life after college. For example, teachers for 15 to 17 March 2022 programmes such as skills for work and living and maths, have ensured that they are planned coherently and sequenced in a way that builds knowledge and skills over time. However, in other subject areas, teachers do not have a good enough understanding of what learners already know and can do at the start of their learning programmes to inform planning. Consequently, a small minority of learners do not access a curriculum that is sufficiently planned and individualised.

p.2

better?

Leaders have focused rightly on improving the curriculum offer by ensuring that mathematics, English and BSL are at the core of the curriculum. As a result, a few students are achieving functional skills in literacy and higher qualifications in maths. This is supporting them to improve their fluency in BSL and achieving a BSL qualification at level 3. However, they have not ensured that the curriculum is ambitious enough for all learners. The curriculum is not yet sufficiently informed by the outcomes detailed in learners’ EHC plans. Consequently, for a few learners, the structure of the curriculum is limiting what they can access and achieve.

p.3

better?

The staff team comprises a few staff who are deaf, including in senior positions, that act as role models. Teachers have expert knowledge of working with deaf young people. Teachers have sound knowledge of the subjects they teach. As such, two teachers at the academy recently received national recognition for their creation of an innovative online curriculum during the pandemic.

p.3

better?

The majority of teachers use different communication styles and languages to systematically check learners’ understanding. However, a few teachers do not ensure the curriculum is fully accessible or sufficiently individualised to meet learners’ needs. As a result, a few learners miss key information and are not enabled to be fully involved in the learning.

p.3

better?

Although improved, leaders’ systems for quality assuring the standards of teaching are not yet effective. They have rightly identified the need to further develop teachers to effectively plan and implement the curriculum, using learners’ starting points. Additionally, teachers use of assessment to monitor learners’ progress in knowing and remembering the curriculum content is not yet sufficiently developed. As a result, a few learners do not develop new knowledge, skills and behaviours to better prepare them for work and living more independently.

p.3

better?

Leaders recognise the work of specialist therapists has not been effective in providing students with appropriate strategies to support their learning. They understand the impact of COVID-19 on the team but have been slow to recruit additional staff. Consequently, a significant few learners’ needs are not being met as outlined in their EHC plans, as they do not have access to specific learning tools or communication aids which impacts on their ability to make progress towards their planned outcomes.

p.3

better?

Managers and teachers have developed a clearly structured curriculum to develop learners’ understanding of keeping safe and well, including healthy relationships. This supports them to develop the knowledge and skills to make positive choices as an adult. During tutor time, learners explore a broad range of topics, including democracy and understanding of the dangers online of radicalisation. For example, 15 to 17 March 2022 learners have actively participated in campaigns to reduce local speed limits and save lives. However, staff frequently refer inappropriately to education as school. The language used by staff and students is not always appropriate to what one would expect for young adults studying in a further education setting.

p.3

better?

Leaders actively seek opportunities to build partnerships with employers to develop the work experience offer. Learners recently took part in national careers week and met with a professional footballer to understand the demands of being a professional athlete. Learners also visited a football stadium to explore other employment opportunities related to the industry. However, not all students access relevant work experiences to support their aspirational career choices.

p.4

better?

Governors are highly experienced within the education, care and charitable sectors. They use their experiences well to hold leaders to account. They recognise rightly that the standards of teaching and assessment is not yet good enough to impact on learners developing the knowledge and skills, to make swift progress, in line with their planned outcomes.

p.4

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.4

Safeguarding

Leaders have rightly focused on developing effective systems for reporting and recording safeguarding concerns following previous inspections. They have invested in an integrated safeguarding team which includes a social worker to support students’ safety and welfare needs. Students understand how to report concerns about their welfare and safety in college.

p.4

Safeguarding

The college site incorporates the school as part of the single-site academy. The school and college students have separated learning areas which have access control systems. However, leaders and governors do not fully recognise the implications for safeguarding children and young people, including adult students working alongside children in the school and college building. They recognise the benefits of children and young people learning from socialising together as part of the deaf community but do not adequately prioritise the potential risks. For example, risk assessments for shared areas such as the multi-use games area and atrium, identify generic health and safety risks and not potential risks associated with safeguarding.

p.4

What does the provider need to do to improve?

 Leaders must ensure that learners benefit from an ambitious, well-planned, and well- taught coherent curriculum that enables learners to gain the new knowledge, skills, and behaviours they need to meet their planned outcomes. 15 to 17 March 2022  Leaders must ensure that teachers receive the appropriate training to plan and implement an effective curriculum to meet the needs of learners, including those with specific and more-complex learning needs.  Leaders must develop teachers’ understanding of planning the curriculum, using learners’ starting points and the use of assessment to monitor learners’ progress.  Leaders must ensure that learners receive the educational and therapeutic support for which they are entitled to and as detailed in their EHC plans.  Leaders must ensure that quality assurance processes are effective and lead to a consistently high quality of education for all learners.  Leaders must take action to review risk assessments for shared areas and activities

p.4

What does the provider need to do to improve?

where pupils from the school and college students come together. This is to reassure themselves that children and young people are safe from risks. 15 to 17 March 2022

p.5

Provider details

Address 1 Douglas Avenue Exmouth EX8 2AU

p.6

Provider details

Provider type Independent Specialist College

p.6

Provider details

Date of previous inspection 15 to 17 January 2019

p.6

Provider details

Main subcontractors None 15 to 17 March 2022

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspection team was assisted by the assistant principal, as nominee. Inspectors took account of the provider’s most recent self-evaluation report and development plan, and the previous inspection report. The inspection was carried out using the further education and skills inspection handbook and took into account all relevant provision at the provider. Inspectors collected a wide range of evidence to inform judgements, including visiting learning sessions, scrutinising learners’ work, seeking the views of learners, staff and other stakeholders, and examining the provider’s documentation and records.

p.7

Inspection team

Tina Pagett, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Esther Williams Ofsted Inspector Tracey Griffin Ofsted Inspector Louise Rowley Ofsted Inspector 15 to 17 March 2022 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk.

p.8

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk.

p.8

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn.

p.8

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion