Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected 23 Mar 2022 · published 19 May 2022

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Richard Jones

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    23 Mar 2022

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Richard Jones

  • Postcode verified

    BD20 6LH

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−10Mixedmore positive than 23% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositiveimprovingfeel safeclearrespectfulsafepromptly
Criticismconcernsseriousweaknesses

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings138w0
  • What needs to improve802w−10

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
940
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 47
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 14%What needs to improve 80%About the inspection 7%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Ms S Mather Headteacher The Holy Family Catholic School Spring Gardens Lane Keighley West Yorkshire BD20 6LH

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 23 March 2022, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken since the school's most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses in July 2021. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

This was the third routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. I discussed the ongoing impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

towards the removal of the serious weaknesses designation.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

The local authority's statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

The school's improvement plan is fit for purpose. I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Leeds, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children's services for Bradford. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.1

Context

There have been leadership changes since the previous inspection. The headteacher was permanently appointed in September 2021. A new deputy headteacher and interim deputy headteacher were also appointed. There is also a new assistant headteacher who joined the school in January 2022. The local governing body has also appointed three new governors.

p.3

designation

School leaders have been proactive in improving their capacity to respond to concerns identified at the previous inspection. External and internal appointments have been strategic. This has allowed leaders to have a sharp focus on the agreed improvement areas highlighted in the school improvement plan.

p.3

designation

Leaders have acted decisively to improve the safeguarding culture in school. The pupils spoken to during the inspection said that they feel safe. They know that staff in the school are there to support them and they know they can speak to anyone if they have concerns or worries. Leaders have prioritised safeguarding training for staff. Regular activities are planned to ensure that staff know the different aspects of safeguarding and what to do if they are concerned. Staff are clear on the processes and the importance of acting quickly.

p.3

designation

Leaders have taken appropriate steps to ensure staff understand the whistleblowing policy. Staff understand how to report concerns.

p.3

designation

The designated senior leader for safeguarding (DSL) and the newly appointed deputy DSL monitor records and submissions made from staff. Records show that concerns have been acted on quickly and the actions taken have been in the best interests of pupils.

p.3

designation

Leaders have in place a behaviour system that through training and support is being applied with greater consistency. Pupils and staff understand the policy and feel that behaviour is improving. Leaders are monitoring and recording incidents through a system which allows parents to see in real time both negative and positive entries from staff. The positive rewards pupils receive are linked to virtues that they understand. The relationships between pupils and staff are respectful. During social times, staff are on duty to support pupils should they need it.

p.3

designation

Leaders have established clear systems to monitor attendance and punctuality. The attendance and pastoral team support pupils and their families when they are finding things challenging. Staff use a checker email to let the team know if a pupil has not arrived at a lesson. Staff act promptly to locate pupils and ensure they are safe. Leaders have also taken actions to support well-being. The school has invested in provision which gives pupils access to support and help should they need it. Pupils appreciate this and feel that staff at The Holy Family Catholic School care.

p.3

designation

Leaders and staff have continued to develop and strengthen the new curriculum plans which were launched in September 2021. The delivery of the new curriculum has been supported through professional development. This has focused on general areas of education and also subject-specific elements. Staff have embraced the opportunity to work across different faculties. They have enjoyed sharing ideas with different colleagues.

p.4

designation

Leaders are reflective and see curriculum refinement as a continual process. A focus on formative assessment and developing individual teachers is something leaders are determined to maintain. Leaders and staff are aligned in their curriculum thinking and vision for the pupils.

p.4

designation

The new leader of personal, social and health education has redesigned curriculum plans. The content is broad and diverse. Common threads, such as British values, run through all years. Pupils could explain the values and go into detail about how they help prepare them for life beyond school. Staying safe is also part of the curriculum. This focuses on risks pupils may be exposed to and how to deal with different situations. The curriculum is still at an early stage and does require further time to be fully embedded.

p.4

designation

The school has high ambitions for all pupils. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities have access to the same curriculum and wider opportunities the school offers other pupils.

p.4

designation

The governing body is well informed about leaders’ work. They have a detailed understanding of the priorities for the school. Leaders are regularly challenged about the information shared and the progress made against the areas for improvement.

p.4

Additional support

The school has welcomed and benefited from support, challenge and guidance from the local authority, the diocese and a local academy trust. The combination of support has been well managed, with each focusing on different areas but also combining thoughts to help move the school forward.

p.4

Evidence

The inspector observed the school's work, scrutinised documents and met with the headteacher, other senior leaders, pupils, staff, representatives of those responsible for governance, a representative of the local authority and a representative of the diocese.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion