Early years · Early years compliance action
Abbots Langley Pre-School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
9 May 2022
- URN verified
EY540884
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 1
- Words of findings
- 305
- about usual (typical 317)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 35
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 29%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 24 March 2022, we carried out an inspection and found the provider was not meeting some of these requirements. The overall effectiveness of the provision was judged to be inadequate. The inspection report sets out the actions the provider was required to take to meet the requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 4 My 2022 we carried out a regulatory visit. The focus of the visit was to check whether the provider had met the safeguarding and welfare actions and learning and development actions, raised at their last inspection. We found the provider had met some of the safeguarding and welfare actions but not others. For example, they improved the safety of the premises and all staff were using updated risk assessment procedures to ensure all areas are suitable for children's use. Induction procedures had been improved and new staff recruited were undertaking some appropriate training to equip them for their roles.
p.1
Summary of outcome
While staff had completed some updated child protection training this had not had the full impact. For example, staff were still unsure about some broader aspects of child protection such as how to respond to signs of potential radicalisation. Staff had not yet attended updated training in management of behaviour. The manager was working with outside support services to improve how staff manage children's behaviour consistently but had not had not fully implemented planned new procedures.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We will continue to review the action taken by the provider to meet the requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider will be able to give parents further information about this. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion