Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)
Grateley House School
Summary
Mark Newington (lead), Emeline Evans
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
3 Mar 2022
- Inspectors verified
Emeline Evans, Mark Newington
- Helped and protected verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Postcode verified
SP11 8TA
- Name on report verified
Grateley House School
- URN verified
SC012450
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2020.
- OverallRI to be good
- Helped and protectedRI to be good
- Leadership and managementRI to be good
13% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement to be good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement to be good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted. p.1
- Students are cared for by a skilled staff team that has developed positive relationships with them. p.2
- One parent said, ‘My son loves his school and feels well supported by both care and education.’ p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Overall judgement at last inspection: inadequate Inspection report for residential special school - Grateley House School 2 p.1
- This places students at risk of further harm. p.3
- This lack of detail is a missed opportunity to identify any patterns or trends of behaviour. p.3
- This means that students do not always know what happened as a result of their complaint Inspection report for residential special school - Grateley House School 3 When medication errors have occurred, they have been reported and acted on swiftly. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Ensure that following complaints, students are informed of the outcome. p.5
- Ensure that student council meetings review actions to demonstrate to students the impact they have. p.5
- Ensure that lower-level concerns of behaviour are documented effectively to allow leaders to monitor trends. p.5
- Ensure that when restraints are used on the floor, students’ vital signs are checked. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance12
“The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,364
- shorter than usual (typical 2096)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 43
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for residential special school - Grateley House School 1 Grateley House School Grateley House School, Pond Lane, Grateley, Andover, Hampshire SP11 8TA Residential provision inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this residential special school
Grateley House School is an independent residential special school for students who have a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. Many students have other associated difficulties. Each student has an education, health and care plan and is usually placed at the school by their local authority. At the time of the inspection, there were 33 students on roll and 14 residential students. Residential students are accommodated in four houses on the school site.
p.1
Information about this residential special school
Due to COVID-19, at the request of the Secretary of State, we suspended all routine inspections of social care providers carried out under the social care common inspection framework (SCCIF) on 10 December 2020. We returned to routine SCCIF inspections on 12 April 2021.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
requires improvement to be good
How well children and young people are helped and protected requires improvement to be good
p.1
requires improvement to be good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good
p.1
requires improvement to be good
The residential special school is not yet delivering good help and care for children and young people. However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted.
p.1
requires improvement to be good
Date of previous inspection: 9 March 2020
p.1
requires improvement to be good
Overall judgement at last inspection: inadequate Inspection report for residential special school - Grateley House School 2
p.1
improvement to be good
Students are cared for by a skilled staff team that has developed positive relationships with them. Staff have a good knowledge of the students’ individual needs and treat the students with dignity and respect. However, because of the currently depleted staff team, students’ specific needs are not consistently being met. Despite this, the students report being happy and having good relationships with the staff.
p.2
improvement to be good
Due to the lack of permanent residential staff, there has been an impact to what students can enjoy from a recreational perspective. Staff try to ensure that there are opportunities for activities and trips out, but these have become dependent on the staffing levels, competency and skills available on each shift.
p.2
improvement to be good
Staff speak proudly of the progress that students make, for example in relation to their education, social and life skills. Students are equally proud of these achievements and appreciate the way that the staff have supported them.
p.2
improvement to be good
Students’ overall progress is supported by the involvement of a multi-disciplinary therapy team. Having recently expanded, the team now has a more active role in the day-to-day decision-making of the school and in the students’ care planning. This allows more students to access support as they overcome the potential barrier of talking one-to-one with a therapist. The result is a greater oversight and a positive impact on the students’ mental health and well-being.
p.2
improvement to be good
Parents are generally positive about the way that the students are looked after and the levels of communication from the school. They are clear that the school helps students to make progress. One parent said, ‘My son loves his school and feels well supported by both care and education.’
p.2
improvement to be good
Students have access to a variety of ways to ensure that their voices are heard. For example, regular one-to-one sessions allow them to talk about how they are feeling and to reflect on any incidents that may have occurred.
p.2
improvement to be good
Student council meetings are now happening more regularly with a greater number of students taking part. However, while the previous meeting minutes are reviewed, there is not a review of the actions from the last meeting. This is a missed opportunity for students to be able to see the value of the meetings and the impact that they are having.
p.2
improvement to be good
Complaints from students are rare, taken seriously and responded to quickly. However, one complaint record did not include details of the outcome. This means that students do not always know what happened as a result of their complaint Inspection report for residential special school - Grateley House School 3 When medication errors have occurred, they have been reported and acted on swiftly. There have been detailed investigations, and there is clear learning from this shared with staff.
p.2
improvement to be good
Safeguarding arrangements are not fully embedded across the school. For example, there has been a recent change to the designated safeguarding lead that is not known by all the staff. However, all staff spoken with were clear about who the safeguarding team members and whom to report any concerns to.
p.3
improvement to be good
Overall, the staff have a good understanding of the students’ risks and vulnerabilities and act on these appropriately. However, there are inconsistencies in the guidelines and protocols for the staff to follow, especially in relation to the students’ self- harming behaviours. This, combined with the lack of availability of protective equipment and consistent staff training, means that the staff are not equipped to manage these situations safely. This places students at risk of further harm. Actions to arrange immediate training and ligature cutter availability were taken during the inspection.
p.3
improvement to be good
There have been some potential bullying incidents between students. Records of these incidents focus on the perpetrator and do not include or reflect the experiences of the victim. This lack of detail is a missed opportunity to identify any patterns or trends of behaviour.
p.3
improvement to be good
All staff are trained in behaviour management, including how to hold children safely. The use of restrictive physical intervention is rare and has only been used on two occasions since the last inspection. On one of these occasions, a student was restrained on the floor and did not have their immediate well-being checked until after the incident. This shows that there is the potential for such critical checks to be missed during incidents.
p.3
improvement to be good
Risk assessments are not regularly updated to ensure that they reflect known current risks to children. The system in place to monitor behaviours does not consider changes to mental health and focuses on physical changes. This does not allow staff and leaders to evaluate whether the house environment is safe for individual children.
p.3
improvement to be good
Appropriate fire safety checks and health and safety checks are undertaken on a weekly basis to ensure that the homes remain safe. Any actions identified are swiftly responded to. Inspection report for residential special school - Grateley House School 4
p.3
good
The new headteacher and head of care have high aspirations for the school and have been successful in beginning to implement change on a wider school level. Leaders show passion about the ‘journey’ the school is on and are realistic about how quickly this can happen.
p.4
good
The ability to make change has been significantly affected by the current staffing situation. There are a high number of vacancies across the residential provision. In order to provide enough care staff, education colleagues from the school are being used to fill the gaps. The impact of this is that the school has not been able to grow in the way that leaders would wish and that students are not given the opportunities that they would hope for. Leaders have responded to this by reducing the number of students at this time as a measure to reduce risk.
p.4
good
The recent reintroduction of face-to-face exit interviews aims to help leaders understand why staff leave the residential provision. Renewed recruitment strategies also aim to help overcome staff shortage by ensuring that there is a wider circulation of adverts and a quicker response by leaders. Staff describe being well supported by leaders. An open-door policy by the head of care, combined with a more available headteacher, has meant that staff feel confident about who they can talk to when they have concerns. This, together with regular and effective supervision, provides staff with good support.
p.4
good
There are comprehensive plans made to improve the school. These are supplemented by robust standard 20 visits and audits undertaken by the wider organisation as part of their governance role. These allow the headteacher and head of care to be able to continually monitor and assess the progress of the school. Inspection report for residential special school - Grateley House School 5
p.4
special schools
The school does not meet the following national minimum standard(s) for residential special schools:
p.5
special schools
15.1 There is a sufficient number of competent staff deployed appropriately, both as a staff group and on individual shifts, to fulfil the school’s Statement of Purpose and meet the individual needs of all children resident in the school. 11.1 The school ensures that: arrangements are made to safeguard and promote the welfare of children at the school; and such arrangements have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State.
p.5
Recommendations
Ensure that following complaints, students are informed of the outcome. Ensure that student council meetings review actions to demonstrate to students the impact they have. Ensure that lower-level concerns of behaviour are documented effectively to allow leaders to monitor trends. Ensure that when restraints are used on the floor, students’ vital signs are checked.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential special school - Grateley House School 6
p.5
Residential special school details
Social care unique reference number: SC012450
p.6
Residential special school details
Headteacher/teacher in charge: Dan Tresman
p.6
Residential special school details
Type of school: Residential Special School
p.6
Residential special school details
Email address: Eva.Pereira@cambiangroup.com
p.6
Inspectors
Mark Newington, Social Care Inspector (lead) Emeline Evans, Social Care Inspector Pete Hylton, Regulatory Inspection Manager Inspection report for residential special school - Grateley House School 7 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspectors
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspectors
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspectors
T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion