Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Morton Primary School

Inspected 10 Mar 2022 · published 9 May 2022 · URN 112596

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Damien Turrell (lead), Donna Chambers

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Mar 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Damien Turrell, Donna Chambers

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    DE55 6HH

  • Name on report verified

    Morton Primary School

  • URN verified

    112596

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−55Criticalmore positive than 12% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveeffectivelywell plannedsafefeel safeenjoysuccessfullywarm
Criticismnot alwaysconcernsat riskpoorinconsistenciesnot clearnot effectivenot successfully

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1526w−49
  • Safeguarding108w−76

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,591
about usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 53
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 6
Hedged sentences
24%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 70%Safeguarding 5%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

Inspection of Morton Primary School Main Road, Morton, Alfreton, Derbyshire DE55 6HH

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 9 and 10 March 2022

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Inconsistencies in the school’s safeguarding arrangements mean that pupils who may require help or protection do not always receive the support they need. Leaders do not deal with some safeguarding incidents effectively enough. It is not always clear what further actions staff have taken when they have concerns about pupils’ welfare. Safeguarding records are poor. Leaders do not carry out their safeguarding responsibilities effectively at all times.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils generally behave well. Leaders create a calm and orderly environment in the school. As a result, most pupils concentrate and focus on their learning. Pupils have positive relationships with staff and with each other. Pupils told inspectors that behaviour is good most of the time and that staff deal quickly with any incidents of bullying. Pupils say that they feel safe.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy working hard. However, pupils do not always remember what they have been taught across the curriculum. On occasions, teachers do not have a sufficiently clear understanding of how successfully the curriculum supports pupils to know and remember more. This includes disadvantaged pupils and pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Most parents and carers have positive views of the school. One parent, typical of many, said, ‘Nothing seems too much for the staff.’ Parents appreciate the warm and friendly atmosphere.

p.2

better?

The quality of education has declined since the previous inspection. It is not always clear what pupils should be learning and when in the different subjects. In science and art, improvements are already underway. Leaders have identified some of the key content they expect pupils to learn in these subjects. However, leaders have not yet identified the key knowledge that pupils need to learn in all subjects. Leaders have not identified curriculum content with sufficient precision so that pupils remember the most important knowledge. This prevents pupils from building their understanding over time. Subject leaders do not regularly check how successfully pupils access the curriculum. Leaders have not ensured that staff use assessment well enough to identify how well pupils are learning or whether they are falling behind.

p.2

better?

Reading is prioritised across the school. There is a sharp focus in all year groups on ensuring that pupils acquire a wide vocabulary. There is a consistent approach to the teaching of phonics across the school. Pupils build up their phonics knowledge to enable them to read. Staff are trained well. They teach pupils to use decoding skills to sound out unfamiliar words. Books are matched to the letters and sounds pupils are learning. Staff are quick to provide support when pupils fall behind. 9 and 10 March 2022

p.2

3

The mathematics curriculum is well planned. However, leaders have not agreed on how mathematics should be taught at the school. As a result, they have not ensured that there is consistency across all classes in how teachers teach knowledge in this subject. Teachers’ subject knowledge is sometimes not strong enough. This means that they do not always present subject content clearly. Consequently, pupils sometimes confuse mathematical concepts, such as division. Pupils often struggle to remember previous curriculum content. For example, some pupils cannot remember how to calculate equivalent fractions and factor pairs, despite recent lessons in these areas.

p.3

3

Until recently, leaders’ work to identify those pupils who may have special educational needs and/or disabilities has not been precise enough. Staff do not always identify well enough the additional needs of those pupils with SEND so that they can provide the right support. As a result, access to the curriculum is variable for these pupils. Some pupils with SEND do not make the progress that they should . Leaders are aware of this and have identified what needs to improve.

p.3

3

Relationships are very positive between children and adults in the early years. Leaders provide an engaging environment inside and outside the classroom. Leaders have started to set out how learning in the early years connects with the learning that pupils will encounter as they move through the school. This is very clear in some areas. However, leaders have not identified the knowledge which children should learn in all areas of learning. Sometimes, children do not remember what they have been taught across the curriculum in the early years.

p.3

3

Pupils understand right and wrong. They understand the different forms that families can take. Pupils know how to eat healthily and keep fit. Leaders have organised the curriculum so that pupils are being prepared for life in modern Britain. Pupils discuss current affairs in assemblies. However, pupils’ understanding of fundamental British values and different faiths is fragile. Leaders do not consistently check how successfully pupils remember what they have learned, particularly from their lessons in personal, social, health and economic education and religious education.

p.3

3

Governors do not receive comprehensive information from school leaders. Governors support leaders but do not hold them to account sufficiently well enough. Governors do not understand their statutory duties, particularly their duties concerning safeguarding. Leaders engage well with staff and take account of their workload.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders do not fully understand the signs that a pupil may be at risk. They do not always provide sufficient support for pupils about whom they have safeguarding concerns. The procedures for recording and following up on safeguarding concerns are not robust. Leaders do not routinely record the actions they take when concerns are raised. This means that pupils are potentially at risk. 9 and 10 March 2022

p.3

4

Not all staff have up-to-date knowledge of current safeguarding practice.

p.4

4

The governing body has not ensured that the school’s safeguarding arrangements meet statutory requirements. Procedures for the safe recruitment of staff are secure.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leaders have not made sure that the procedures for keeping pupils safe meet statutory requirements. Record-keeping is poor. Staff’s training is not sufficient. Staff, including leaders, do not understand the seriousness of some incidents related to pupils’ welfare. This places pupils potentially at risk. Leaders must ensure that all the statutory requirements for safeguarding are met. They must ensure that all staff have up-to-date safeguarding knowledge and understand their responsibilities in identifying, recording and reporting safeguarding concerns.  Governors do not meet their statutory duties, including those related to making sure that the pupils are kept safe. They do not receive all the right information that they need to hold leaders fully to account. The governing body should ensure that they meet their legal requirements for the safeguarding of pupils and that they have the right information to be able to hold the school leaders fully to account.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leaders are partway through developing a sequenced curriculum. In some subjects, leaders have yet to identify the key knowledge that they wish pupils to learn. As a result, on occasions, there are inconsistencies in what pupils can recall about their learning. Leaders should ensure that there is clarity about what pupils should learn and when across all subjects, so that all pupils, including those with SEND, build their understanding over time.  Leaders’ approach to monitoring and evaluating the quality of education in the different subjects is not rigorous enough. As a result, they do not have a sufficiently clear understanding of how well pupils access the curriculum in each subject so that they know and remember more. Leaders, including subject leaders, should ensure that their approach to monitoring and evaluating the curriculum is sufficiently rigorous to inform them about what aspects need to improve further so that the school’s quality of

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

education is good.  Leaders do not ensure that pupils with SEND access the curriculum well enough. Leaders have not established rigorous systems to assess and meet these pupils’ individual needs. As a result, pupils with SEND do not always benefit from a good- quality education. Leaders should make sure that all pupils with SEND receive the support they need to enable them to access the full curriculum and achieve as highly as they should.  The school’s approach to assessment is inconsistent. Staff regularly assess what pupils know. However, staff are not always clear about what they are trying to achieve through undertaking such assessments. It is not always clear when teachers use assessment as to whether they are aiming to help pupils embed knowledge, trying to inform their own teaching, or attempting to understand gaps in learning due to the 9 and 10 March 2022

p.4

5

pandemic. Leaders need to ensure that all staff understand the rationale behind their use of assessment and that the use of assessment does not place unnecessary burdens on staff or pupils.  Some pupils’ knowledge of British values and different faiths is fragile. Although they know to respect difference, some pupils are not as aware as they should be of what these differences may be. Leaders should ensure that pupils have the necessary knowledge and understanding of British values and different faiths.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.5

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.5

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 9 and 10 March 2022

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.6

School details

Website www.morton.derbyshire.sch.uk Date of previous inspection 10 January 2017, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.6

Information about this school

 The headteacher was appointed in September 2017.  The school joined a federation with Stretton Handley CE VC Primary School in September 2021.  The school makes use of one unregistered provision.

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspectors deemed the inspection a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.6

Information about this inspection

In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.

p.6

Information about this inspection

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. 9 and 10 March 2022

p.6

7

 The inspectors met with the headteacher, curriculum leaders, the leader with responsibility for the provision for pupils with SEND and a sample of teaching and support staff.  The inspectors met with representatives of the governing body, including the chair of governors.  The inspectors carried out deep dives in reading, mathematics, art and science. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  The inspectors examined a range of school documentation, including leaders’ self- evaluation, improvement plans and documentation relating to attendance and behaviour.  The inspectors met with the designated safeguarding lead. They considered the safeguarding policy, training records and examples of safeguarding concerns.  The inspectors considered responses to the online survey, Ofsted Parent View,

p.7

7

including the responses to the free-text service. The inspectors also considered the responses to the staff survey and the pupil survey.

p.7

Inspection team

Damien Turrell, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Donna Chambers Ofsted Inspector 9 and 10 March 2022

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion