Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

The Springfields Academy

Inspected 10 Mar 2022 · published 6 May 2022 · URN 145198

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Mar 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Hilary Goddard, Stephen Lee, Stephen McShane

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    SN11 0DS

  • Name on report verified

    The Springfields Academy

  • URN verified

    145198

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+45Positivemore positive than 27% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseextremelyclearsuccessfullyeffectivestronghappypositiveskilfully
Criticismconcernsnot alwaysinconsistenciesnot rigorousnot effectivenot happynot precisely

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings940w+44
  • Safeguarding101w+32

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,024
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 55
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 61%Safeguarding 7%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of The Springfields Academy Curzon Street, Calne, Wiltshire SN11 0DS

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 8 to 10 March 2022

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

All pupils have special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), and staff understand these needs extremely well. Staff also understand how these needs relate to each unique pupil’s interests and ambitions. As a result, pupils are successfully helped to attain the school’s stated goal of living ‘safe and independent lives’. Pupils are happy at the school and attend well. Nonetheless, there are aspects of the educational curriculum that pupils follow that are not rigorous enough.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils behave well, and staff know how to help them to do this. The number of occasions where pupils are held has reduced significantly over time. The school has clear systems to enable pupils to raise concerns about bullying. Pupils say that staff usually deal with any bullying well but that, on occasions, staff do not always get to the root of the problem.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils experience a wide range of therapy appropriate to their needs. Therapy is threaded through pupils’ timetables and is seen as integral to their educational success. For example, the use of animal therapy has led to an increased interest from pupils in following an animal care curriculum pathway. Leaders have listened and made this happen.

p.2

better?

Leaders, governors and trustees have a clear, shared vision of securing positive outcomes for all pupils. Staff share this moral purpose. They know their pupils extremely well and use this knowledge to think carefully about each pupil’s individual curriculum. Where the curriculum is working well, there is a clear link between what leaders want pupils to learn, how this knowledge will be taught and how pupils’ learning is assessed. As a result, pupils learn well, deepening their knowledge over time. This can be seen in the mathematics and science curriculums.

p.2

better?

In some areas of the curriculum, while a lot of thought has gone into how knowledge will be taught, similar attention has not been given to precisely what will be taught. This can also mean that teaching activities are not well chosen. Therefore, pupils do not deepen their knowledge over time. This is the case, for example, in some aspects of the school’s programme of learning outside the classroom.

p.2

better?

Leaders rightly place a strong emphasis on ensuring all pupils learn to read well. For those pupils who need it, a phonics programme is in place. This is supplemented by speech and language therapy where appropriate. Pupils read every day. Teachers tackle some pupils’ reluctance to engage with the written word skilfully. The priority given to reading is shared by all staff. This includes the support staff, many of whom listen to children read as part of the reading programme. However, leaders know that there are some inconsistencies in the implementation of the phonics programme and are taking steps to address these. 8 to 10 March 2022

p.2

3

Leaders have developed an effective careers programme. They use work experience well, within the limits set by the COVID-19 pandemic. Virtually all pupils go on to sustained education, employment or training. The school meets the requirements of the Baker Clause, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.3

3

Leaders, governors and trustees have successfully managed a significant transition in the school’s provision. In the past, the pupils’ most common area of need was social, emotional and mental health difficulties. The vast majority of pupils now have communication and interaction needs, including a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). At the same time, leaders have brought about a change of culture in the way pupils’ behaviour is managed. This has led to a significant reduction in the need to hold pupils.

p.3

3

Local governors have a clear understanding of their role. They see themselves as ‘the eyes and ears of the trust on the ground’. Trustees have well-established procedures to secure accountability across all levels of leadership. Leaders, trustees and governors know the school’s provision well, but there is a tendency to be over- optimistic about the quality of the education it provides.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders have developed a secure culture of safeguarding. Staff have a well- developed understanding of safeguarding in a school where virtually all pupils have ASD. They are keenly aware of the particular risks faced by pupils with ASD, such as vulnerability to grooming or radicalisation, especially when online. The required pre- employment checks for prospective staff are recorded efficiently. In a couple of areas, such as reference verification and the recording of manual holds, record- keeping could be sharper, but this does not undermine the effective safeguarding culture that is clearly present in the school.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In some areas, rigour and clarity of curriculum thinking are not as evident as they are in others. This can mean that teaching is not based securely enough on what pupils need to know and remember in the long term and how this builds on an accurate assessment of their needs. It can also lead to teaching activities that are not appropriate for the intended curriculum outcome. In these parts of the curriculum, leaders must ensure that they are clear about what they want pupils to learn over time and that teaching activities support the achievement of these curriculum goals. 8 to 10 March 2022

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 8 to 10 March 2022

p.4

School details

School category Academy special sponsor-led

p.5

sixth form

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.5

Information about this school

 The school joined the Reach South Academy Trust in November 2017. The predecessor school was graded requires improvement.  The school operates from two sites. The second site, Springfields South, is in Salisbury and was opened in 2019.  The school has one pupil in its post-16 provision.  The school uses one registered alternative provider and three unregistered ones.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 8 to 10 March 2022

p.5

6

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.

p.6

6

 This inspection was carried out at the same time as an inspection of the residential provision.  Inspectors met with the headteacher, the deputy headteacher, the assistant headteachers, phase leaders, curriculum leaders, the special educational needs coordinator, governors and trustees.  Inspectors carried out deep dives into these subjects: communication and language (including reading), mathematics, physical education and personal, social and health education. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also spoke to leaders about the curriculum in other subjects, such as science and computer science.  Inspectors looked at the school’s safeguarding records and discussed safeguarding with leaders and other staff.  In making their judgements, inspectors took into account the responses to the

p.6

6

online survey for parents, Ofsted Parent View. They also looked at the results of the pupil and staff surveys.

p.6

Inspection team

Stephen Lee, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Hilary Goddard Ofsted Inspector 8 to 10 March 2022

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion