Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Maldon Primary School

Inspected 3 Feb 2022 · published 3 May 2022 · URN 143122

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Liz Smith (lead), John Lucas

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    3 Feb 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    John Lucas, Liz Smith

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    CM9 5DQ

  • Name on report verified

    Maldon Primary School

  • URN verified

    143122

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−35Criticalmore positive than 40% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseconcernsambitioushappyfeel safeconfidenteffectivelyclearsafe
Criticismlacknot robustnot effectiveweaknessesnot happytoo oftenlacksnot sufficiently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1328w−28
  • Safeguarding135w−46

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,434
about usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 53
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 6
Hedged sentences
19%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%Safeguarding 7%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

Inspection of Maldon Primary School Wantz Chase, Maldon, Essex CM9 5DQ

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Early years provision Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 2 and 3 February 2022

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils have mixed feelings about school. While many speak enthusiastically about sign language club and the opportunity to be a play ambassador, they also tire of the ‘clownish’ behaviour of some pupils in lessons. Pupils report that as the day progresses, some pupils’ behaviour deteriorates.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils respond well to their lessons in English and mathematics, concentrating and following teachers’ instructions closely. This is not the case across the wider curriculum. Pupils say they want to learn but are disrupted by the antics of their classmates. Too often, pupils find the lessons boring and so choose to misbehave. In contrast, children in early years learn in a calm and productive environment. Parents commented to inspectors on how happy and settled their children are in Reception.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils say that they feel safe and that there is little bullying. However, numerous pupils spoke of name-calling, arguing and incidents of pupils being mean to one another. While pupils trust adults to stop such behaviour, they say it starts up again. Just over half the pupils who responded to the Ofsted pupil survey agreed that they would recommend the school.

p.2

better?

Trust leaders identified that the quality of education is not where it should be, and that leaders are not addressing concerns with safeguarding quickly enough. A rapid recovery programme is in place and is having impact. Leaders have focused on getting the curriculum right for the delivery of the basics. Staff have received training and are confident in their teaching of English, mathematics and science.

p.2

better?

Children in Reception who are learning to read follow a systematic phonics programme which supports them well. Staff are well trained to teach the chosen phonics programme. They do so effectively. Pupils read books that match their reading abilities. Pupils who need extra support are quickly identified and given further practice, which helps them to catch up. Similarly, in mathematics and science, leaders carefully consider how pupils’ knowledge and skills develop over time. Teachers give pupils regular opportunities to revisit learning so that they easily recall key concepts.

p.2

better?

The curriculum in other subjects is not as precisely designed. In some subjects, work to establish exactly what pupils should learn is in its early stages. Trust leaders have bought in commercial schemes in some subjects, which helps the development of staff’s subject knowledge and delivery. However, this is a work in progress and there is a lot more to do. This includes in the early years, where the planning for children’s personal and emotional development lacks cohesion.

p.2

better?

Provision for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) is improving but remains too uneven. Staff receive ongoing training and are better placed to meet pupils’ needs in the core subjects. Pupils’ individual plans are more 2 and 3 February 2022

p.2

3

precise and give clear guidance to adults about the support required in English and mathematics. This is not the case for other subjects. Additional support sessions for pupils with SEND can, sometimes, limit the breadth and quality of their experience across the wider curriculum.

p.3

3

Staff struggle to support pupils who have complex behavioural needs. Most staff who responded to the Ofsted staff survey were of the view that they are not supported adequately to deal with behaviour. There is a high rate of behaviour incidents and suspensions. The reasons for exclusion include violent and aggressive behaviour, including physical assault.

p.3

3

While the personal development curriculum is comprehensive and meets requirements, leaders’ systems for checking that pupils develop an age-appropriate understanding of the key messages are underdeveloped. In some instances, pupils are not demonstrating the values they are learning. Some pupils lack respect for their teachers and for each other. This is not the case in all classes. In early years, children play well together. They take turns, share their equipment and listen closely to their peers and to adults. Children benefit from a well-resourced outdoor area which promotes their physical development well.

p.3

3

Leaders know that the status quo is not currently working. Current systems are not helping leaders to check well enough what is working and what is not. Some staff are not happy, citing heavy workload and stress. To increase capacity and support leaders, trust leaders have allocated additional resource, with the deployment of extra staff from the trust.

p.3

3

Over time, governors have challenged the information leaders provide. They have questioned senior leaders’ conclusions and noted that leaders’ self-evaluation is too generous. Governors ensure they gain other views of the school, either by checking through visiting the school themselves, through trust personnel visits or through external consultants.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders are not responding to concerns raised by staff or other agencies in a timely way. When they receive notifications, leaders do not routinely check on the welfare and well-being of the most vulnerable pupils. Sometimes, leaders will make decisions that are not in the best interests of the pupil, such as suspensions. Staff are not following government guidance when they undertake intimate care.

p.3

Safeguarding

Record-keeping is not robust. There is a lack of detail in some records. There are gaps where leaders have not recorded communications.

p.3

Safeguarding

Pupils learn how to stay safe online. However, some older pupils do not follow the advice. Their use of inappropriate apps for their age, and virtually trading with strangers while gaming, is leaving them open to risk. 2 and 3 February 2022

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The school’s procedures for sharing and recording information about safeguarding are not robust. Information about pupils’ welfare and communications with other professionals are either missing or not recorded in detail. Leaders and governors must urgently review and improve arrangements for noting, reporting and sharing information about pupils’ welfare and safety.  Staff, including leaders, are not following closely government guidance for safeguarding. Staff are not undertaking intimate care procedures correctly. Leaders are not routinely ‘touching base’ to check on the welfare and well-being of the most vulnerable pupils. Trust leaders need to urgently run further safeguarding training so that all staff are clear about their roles and responsibilities for the safeguarding of children.  The curriculum is not fully designed to show what should be taught in each year group and when, in each subject. Nor is it clear how the curriculum in subjects

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

other than English and mathematics can be adapted so that pupils with SEND can excel. As a result, pupils are not learning a rich and ambitious wider curriculum. Senior leaders know the improvements that are needed. They should ensure these are secured as soon as possible, including ensuring greater cohesion in the early years curriculum for personal and emotional development.  Too many pupils do not behave well in some lessons. Some staff say that the behaviour policy is confusing. Most staff are of the view that they are not supported to deal with some pupils’ complex behaviour. Senior leaders need to review the behaviour policy, provide training where necessary and ensure that staff are supported to manage challenging behaviour.  Leaders are unclear as to the extent to which pupils absorb important messages put across through the school’s personal, social and health education (PSHE) programme. Some pupils lack understanding and this limits their ability to make

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

informed decisions about how to conduct themselves and be safe. Senior leaders need to review and understand why this is, making alterations to the PSHE curriculum where necessary.  There are weaknesses in senior leadership. Leaders are not sufficiently clear on what is working well and what is not. This means that problems, such as behaviour, become worse as issues are not ‘nipped in the bud’ as they arise. Trust leaders need to support senior leaders in reviewing and tightening systems so that they are better informed. 2 and 3 February 2022

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.5

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.5

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 2 and 3 February 2022

p.5

School details

Website https://sites.google.com/maldon- tkat.org/maldon-primary-school Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.6

Information about this school

 Maldon Primary School joined The Kemnal Academies Trust in September 2017. The headteacher of the school joined in November 2019.  The school does not use alternative provision.  There is a breakfast club for pupils who attend school.

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.6

Information about this inspection

In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.

p.6

Information about this inspection

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. 2 and 3 February 2022

p.6

7

 Inspectors spoke with the director of primary schools from the multi-academy trust, the chair of the local governing board, the headteacher, senior leaders, staff and pupils about the school’s provision.  Inspectors spoke with parents at the start of the school day.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and at less structured times.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in early reading, mathematics, science and physical education to evaluate the quality of education. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, considered curriculum plans, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke with pupils about their learning and scrutinised samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors looked at the curriculum plans for other subjects and spoke with pupils about their learning.  Inspectors considered the provision for: PSHE; relationships, sex and health education; and religious education.

p.7

7

 Inspectors met with the leader in charge of SEND and scrutinised documentation for SEND. Inspectors observed support for pupils with SEND.  Inspectors reviewed the school’s information on behaviour, bullying and attendance. Inspectors reviewed safeguarding records and spoke with the trust director of primary schools, the chair of the local governing board, leaders, staff and pupils about safeguarding arrangements.  Inspectors considered the 46 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Ofsted Parent View, and the 30 free-text comments. Inspectors considered the 29 responses to Ofsted’s staff survey and 44 responses to Ofsted’s pupil survey.

p.7

Inspection team

Liz Smith, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

John Lucas Her Majesty’s Inspector 2 and 3 February 2022

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion