Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Oakwood Primary Academy

Inspected 23 Feb 2022 · published 3 May 2022 · URN 138391

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Shazia Akram

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    23 Feb 2022

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Shazia Akram

  • Postcode verified

    BN22 0SS

  • Name on report verified

    Oakwood Primary Academy

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+43Positivemore positive than 78% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectivestronghigh-qualitypositivelyclearsuccessfulcaring
Criticismweaknessweaknessesnot strongpersistent absence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1181w+43
  • Leadership8w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,186
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
2
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 96%Leadership 1%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Ryan Laker Head of School Oakwood Primary Academy Magnolia Drive Eastbourne East Sussex BN22 0SS

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Oakwood Primary Academy

Following my visit to your school on 22 and 23 February 2022, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken since the school's previous monitoring inspection.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Oakwood Primary Academy

The inspection was the second monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection that took place in March 2020. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The monitoring inspection report is attached.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Oakwood Primary Academy

This was the second routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. I discussed the ongoing impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Oakwood Primary Academy

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

governance are taking effective action towards the removal of special

The school's improvement plan is fit for purpose.

p.1

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that the school may

appoint early career teachers. I am copying this letter to the chair of the interim executive board, the interim chief executive officer of the Aurora Academies Trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children's services for East Sussex. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.1

Context

Since the previous monitoring inspection in June 2021, there have been changes to the leadership of the school. Two senior leaders have been promoted to assistant headteacher posts. One of the assistant headteachers is responsible for curriculum and teaching and learning. The other assistant headteacher is responsible for inclusion.

p.3

Context

Two new teachers and three teaching assistants have also joined the school. Leaders have appointed an attendance officer and two administrative staff.

p.3

Context

The interim executive board (IEB) is still in place. The interim chief executive officer (CEO) of the Aurora Academies Trust took up her post in January 2022.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Leaders and trustees have demonstrated an unwavering commitment to address the areas of weakness identified in the previous section 5 inspection. As well as dealing with the challenges posed by the pandemic, they have resolutely kept the strong momentum of improvement going. Leaders have worked well to embed a collegiate culture at all levels. The whole team is working purposefully, positively and with vigour. This is testament to leaders’ clear commitment to build a school that is successful in all areas of its work. Leaders have rigorously monitored improvements and subsequently adapted the plan of action to help steer their work effectively. This ensures that all staff feel included and play their part in driving important improvements forward.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Leaders have worked diligently to address weaknesses in the quality of education. They are determined to do the right thing by pupils and children in early years. For instance, leaders have completely redesigned the curriculum in most of the foundation subjects and in early years. They have made sure that the curriculum in subjects such as history, geography and art helps pupils and younger children build their knowledge over time. Leaders are beginning to deliver important training for subject leaders and teachers to develop curriculum expertise. Supported by the trust, leaders are also providing further training to ensure that subject leaders are clear about their roles and responsibilities.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Provision for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) is still an area for more development. During this inspection, some examples of effective practice were noted, particularly around how pupils’ pastoral and educational needs are identified and met. However, pupils with SEND do not learn as well in the foundation subjects as they do in English and mathematics. This is because leaders have not made sure that teachers understand how to adapt the curriculum effectively. Therefore, pupils with SEND do not learn as well as their peers in these subjects. Leaders need to address this area of improvement urgently. Leaders are continuing to build on previous improvements made in English and mathematics. Leaders have ensured that there is effective teaching in these subjects. In mathematics, teachers routinely check what pupils and children in early years know before introducing new learning. They identify and address misconceptions. In most year

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

groups, teachers provide pupils with appropriate challenge to deepen their understanding. Teachers’ subject knowledge in key stage 1 is not as strong as it is in the early years and key stage 2. Leaders are rightly addressing this.

p.4

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Leaders continue to prioritise the teaching of reading. Effective and regular staff training ensures that some aspects of phonics are now taught well. While leaders have ensured that books match the school’s phonics programme, staff do not make sure that the books pupils read are carefully matched to the sounds they learn in lessons. As a result, some of the weakest readers, including pupils with SEND, cannot read as well as they should. Leaders have identified this important issue and are taking the right actions in response.

p.4

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Leaders have resolutely continued their work to improve pupils’ attendance and reduce persistent absence. As a result, pupils’ attendance continues to improve. Leaders have not allowed the challenges of the pandemic to interrupt their work. They have worked well to support pupils and their families. Parents who responded to the Ofsted survey were wholeheartedly appreciative of leaders’ work in this respect. A high proportion would recommend Oakwood to other parents. One parent said, ‘The best thing about the school is the head of school and his caring team, they give us everything we would want for our children’.

p.4

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

The executive headteacher of the trust and the IEB continue to lead decisively. The improvements noted during this monitoring inspection clearly show the developing impact of their work. The IEB has continued its rigorous scrutiny of leaders’ work. This ensures that areas such as attendance, curriculum design and teaching are improving continually. Members of the IEB have also ensured that improvement plans are introduced in a thoughtful but timely way so that staff are able to manage their workload successfully.

p.4

Additional support

Leaders and staff have made the most of the support and high-quality training provided by the trust. For instance, subject leaders have worked effectively with specialists to develop the curriculum in foundation subjects and in early years. Leaders are also working with the local mathematics hub.

p.4

Additional support

Leaders benefit from the efficient and timely support provided by the executive headteacher from the trust. The IEB and trustees have continued to commission external evaluations to review the school’s work and provide further challenge and support for leaders.

p.4

Evidence

During the inspection, I met with you, members of the senior leadership team and a range of staff. I met with the chair of trustees and the chair of the IEB online to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. I spoke to pupils formally and informally, including listening to pupils read. I visited a number of lessons, accompanied by senior leaders. I also spoke to the interim CEO and the executive headteacher from the trust. I reviewed plans to improve the school, alongside your self-evaluation, curriculum design, the single central record, safeguarding documents, attendance information and records of staff training. I considered responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View. I spoke informally to parents at the start of the second day of the monitoring inspection. I also considered 26 responses to Ofsted’s staff questionnaire.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion