Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Leyland St Andrew's Church of England Infant School

Inspected 2 Mar 2022 · published 29 Apr 2022 · URN 119369

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

James Blackwell

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    2 Mar 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    James Blackwell

  • Postcode verified

    PR25 1JL

  • Name on report verified

    Leyland St Andrew’s Church of England Infant School

  • URN verified

    119369

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+29Mostly positivemore positive than 23% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestronghigh expectationshappyeffectivelyoutstandingclearambitioushigh-quality
Criticismconcernsat riskseriousnot confidentdisruptionnot alwaysharmnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1412w+38
  • Safeguarding87w−10

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,494
longer than usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Plain English
Flesch 62, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 71%Safeguarding 4%About the inspection 24%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Leyland St Andrew’s Church of England Infant School Woodlea Road, Leyland, Preston, Lancashire PR25 1JL

p.1

Outcome

There has been no change to this school’s overall judgement of good as a result of this initial (section 8) inspection. However, the evidence gathered suggests that the inspection grade might not be as high if a full inspection were carried out now. The next inspection will therefore be a full (section 5) inspection.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils at St Andrew’s Church of England Infant School are delightful. They are kind to each other, work hard and play happily with friends during social times. This is because staff have high expectations for pupils. They place a strong emphasis on respect, the first of the school’s values.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are happy, polite and behave well. Pupils, including those in the early years, know about the harmful effects of name-calling and bullying. When bullying occurs, pupils trust staff to help solve the problem. Being able to share their concerns freely ensures that pupils feel happy and safe.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are keen to talk about their learning. They like the activities that teach them about their local community. Pupils pack in many extra-curricular activities. They talk confidently about their expertise in dance fitness and cheerleading. They also like the range of after- school clubs that develop their academic, creative and sporting prowess.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Despite these positive features, pupils do not achieve as well as they should. This is because in some subjects, including reading, the curriculum that leaders have developed is at an early stage of implementation.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Leaders have successfully steered the school through a period of significant challenge. They have placed pupils at the centre of all their decisions. Their focus on improving the curriculum is crystal clear. 1 and 2 March 2022

p.1

2

Leaders are developing an ambitious curriculum which covers a broad range of subjects. In most subjects, leaders have improved the curriculum and they are clear about what pupils will learn and the order in which they will learn it. In some subjects, like mathematics and science, clear guidance helps teachers to design new learning that builds on what pupils know already. Pupils are beginning to know and remember more in these subjects. However, this is not the case in some other subjects. Leaders have not set out the knowledge that pupils need to learn and when this should be taught. Teachers are less certain about the knowledge that pupils need to know. This means that, at times, pupils do not learn everything that they should in these subjects.

p.2

2

Many teachers routinely use assessment strategies well. This helps to ensure that pupils’ knowledge is secure before moving on to new learning. However, leaders have not ensured that all teachers are equally confident in their approaches to assessment. This means that some pupils do not achieve as well as they should.

p.2

2

Leaders are helping pupils to develop a love of reading. However, leaders have not decided on a clear early reading programme for teachers to follow. Some staff are not confident in teaching early reading. This is because they have not had suitable training. As a result, the delivery of the phonics programme varies too much in its effectiveness. At times, teachers do not match the books that pupils read to the sounds that they know. Some pupils who find reading difficult do not get the help they need to catch up quickly.

p.2

2

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) learn to write and use numbers well. Leaders make sure that they identify and assess the needs of these pupils as early as possible. They ensure that pupils with SEND have access to the same curriculum as everyone else.

p.2

2

Staff support pupils’ behaviour well. Pupils understand the rewards and consequences at their school. Pupils particularly like celebrating by ringing the school bell to let everyone know how well they have done. Pupils say that it makes their parents proud when they do the right thing. There is little disruption to pupils’ learning in classrooms.

p.2

2

Leaders have made sure that pupils’ wider personal development has remained a strong focus throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Leaders provide high-quality activities that pupils and their parents and carers value. Pupils benefit from a range of trips, after-school clubs, visiting speakers and special events to enrich their learning. They speak enthusiastically about these opportunities, such as the visit by the mayor to plant trees in the school grounds.

p.2

2

Governors are keen to improve the school for pupils and staff. However, they are also very new to their roles and require more training and experience to challenge leaders to improve the school. Governors do not have a clear, agreed understanding of what needs to be achieved, or how to check this. As a result, they rely too heavily on leaders to set strategic plans and to evaluate how well the school is performing.

p.2

2

Staff speak positively about the changes introduced by new leaders. They are very aware of the commitment to reducing staff workload. They feel valued and supported by leaders. 1 and 2 March 2022

p.2

3

Reading and governance may usefully serve as a focus for the next inspection.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

There is a strong culture of safeguarding in the school. Leaders know their local community well. They understand the challenges that their pupils face. As a result, leaders make sure staff receive appropriate training to identify pupils who are at risk of harm. Staff are vigilant and responsive to any concerns they have about pupils. Leaders act swiftly on these concerns. They work effectively with a range of external agencies to ensure that these pupils are kept as safe as possible.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leaders are still in the process of developing and implementing the curriculum. Different subjects are at different stages of development. This means that, in some subjects, pupils are not able to build on prior learning. Leaders should ensure that they define more clearly what is being taught, and when, in these subjects. This will help to ensure that pupils’ learning builds carefully on what they already know and remember.  The delivery of the phonics curriculum is not as coherent as it should be. Some teachers are not confident enough to teach the phonics programme. As a result, some pupils do not achieve as well as they could. Leaders should ensure that the delivery of the phonics curriculum is more consistent. They must also make sure that all staff have the expertise that they need to deliver the curriculum. This will help pupils to become more accurate and fluent readers.  Teachers’ checks on pupils’ learning are not used well enough to inform pupils’ future

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

learning. This means that pupils’ learning is not always secure before they move on to something new. Leaders should ensure that they continue to develop teachers’ expertise to use assessment strategies effectively. This will help to ensure that pupils’ knowledge builds securely on what they already know.  Many governors are new to their roles. They have not questioned leaders well enough about the quality of education in the school. As a result, they do not provide leaders with the challenge and support that they need. Members of the governing body should ensure that they gain the knowledge needed to be able to hold leaders more closely to account. 1 and 2 March 2022

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called a section 8 inspection of a good or outstanding school, because it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on a section 8 inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a section 5 inspection. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the section 8 inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the section 8 inspection as a section 5 inspection immediately.

p.4

Background

This is the second section 8 inspection since we judged the school to be good in March 2012.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 1 and 2 March 2022

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 13 October 2016, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 A new headteacher took up post in September 2021.  There have been a significant number of changes to the governing body since the previous inspection.  There have been a significant number of changes to subject leadership since the previous inspection.  The last section 48 inspection was carried out in March 2012.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  During this inspection, the inspector met with the headteacher, members of the governing body, including the chair of governors, and two representatives of the local authority.  The inspector spoke with pupils about their work and school life. 1 and 2 March 2022

p.5

6

 The inspector did deep dives in the following subjects: early reading, mathematics and history. In these subjects, he discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited lessons, spoke with pupils, met with teaching staff and looked at pupils’ work. The inspector observed some pupils read to a familiar adult.  The inspector reviewed a wide range of documentation, including the school’s plans for improvement and minutes of the governing body meetings.  The inspector considered responses to Ofsted Parent View and to the online staff questionnaire. There were no responses to the pupil questionnaire.  The inspector reviewed a range of documentation about safeguarding. The inspector spoke with the headteacher and other staff to understand how they keep pupils safe.

p.6

Inspection team

James Blackwell, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector 1 and 2 March 2022

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion