Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Kindred Cheshunt
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
27 Apr 2022
- URN verified
EY487177
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 1
- Words of findings
- 293
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 7 March 2022 we received concerns that the provider was not meeting some of these requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 1 April 2022 and 26 April 2022 we carried out regulatory telephone calls. We also reviewed documentation that the provider shared with us. We found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements and had taken action to put this right. The provider had improved their procedures to meet the needs of children with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). For example, the Special Educational Needs Coordinator had made stronger links with local support services, to increase the help they could give to children and their families. The provider had also increased the number of staff trained to specifically support children with SEND. This meant that they could cover any staff absences to ensure that any child in need of one-to-one support consistently received this. The provider had also reflected on how they had worked with parents of children with SEND and made improvements to their communication methods. The provider will be able to give
p.1
Summary of outcome
parents further information about this. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.1
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion