Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Preston Primary School

Inspected 3 Feb 2022 · published 16 Mar 2022 · URN 117403

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Daniel Short (lead), Charlie Fordham

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    3 Feb 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Charlie Fordham, Daniel Short

  • Postcode verified

    SG4 7UJ

  • Name on report verified

    Preston Primary School

  • URN verified

    117403

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−24Mixedmore positive than 6% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingcaringenjoykindhappyclearrespectfuleffective
Criticismconcernsshortcomingsweaknessesat riskseriousinconsistencieslackuneven

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1281w−10
  • Safeguarding129w−55

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,408
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 58, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%Safeguarding 7%About the inspection 27%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Preston Primary School Back Lane, Preston, Hitchin, Hertfordshire SG4 7UJ

p.1

Outcome

There has been no change to this school’s overall judgement of good as a result of this initial (section 8) inspection. However, the evidence gathered suggests that the inspection grade might not be as high if a full inspection were carried out now. The next inspection will therefore be a full (section 5) inspection.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The pupils at Preston Primary School are keen and caring. They enjoy their lessons and remember a lot of what their teachers share. Although pupils like to read to staff and to adults at home, the reading curriculum does not currently ensure all pupils learn to read well.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils know they can effect change in their school. The recently appointed ‘Preston Parliament’ has already organised lessons about climate change and arranged intra-school sports events. Pupils know it was not easy for staff to organise after-school clubs during the pandemic. Still, they like the ones running currently and look forward to more starting again in the future.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils behave kindly. They are taught about bullying in assemblies and lessons. Pupils say bullying happens rarely at their school. They say they would tell a member of staff if they experienced bullying. Pupils say staff are kind and good at solving any problems. The care staff show helps pupils feel happy and safe at school.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Leaders recognise the shortcomings in their reading programme. They are taking steps to put things right. They are putting in place a phonics programme better suited to pupils’ needs. Currently, not all staff have received the relevant training. As a result, the quality of how reading is taught is too uneven. Staff share the new reading books with pupils, but some pupils receive books they cannot read. This is particularly problematic for the few pupils in key stage 2 who are still at the early stages of learning to read. Weaknesses in prior teaching mean these pupils do not remember the two- and three-letter sounds in words. 3 February 2022

p.1

2

Governors know what aspects of provision need to be better. They have helped leaders access external advice to support improvements. However, governors are not rigorous enough in how they check these improvements are happening efficiently.

p.2

2

Leaders can evidence greater success elsewhere in their curriculum development. Teachers are clear about what knowledge pupils need to learn. Teachers work hard to design suitable sequences of learning, making use of the curriculum resources shared by leaders. The activities pupils complete help them to remember information over time.

p.2

2

Leaders are currently working with external support to develop their early years provision. Recently, there has been a particular focus on how staff organise the indoor and outdoor learning environment to best support children’s learning. There is evidence that this is working better as children join in readily with the activities staff arrange. Staff have been tasked with hearing every child read to strengthen the early reading programme. However, the same inconsistencies in phonics teaching exist where the phonics programme is in the early stages of implementation.

p.2

2

Teachers assess pupils through the revised feedback and marking policy. They now provide clearer instructions or other exemplars to help pupils learn well. They also ensure pupils know what they have done well and what they must do to further improve.

p.2

2

Previously, the systems for identifying and supporting pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) lacked rigour. Leaders have put this right. Now support for pupils with SEND is specific, measurable and time focused. In this way, leaders can check the support pupils with SEND receive will help them to achieve their best.

p.2

2

Leaders actively look for ways to broaden pupils’ experiences. For example, teachers organise local trips to complement pupils’ learning well. Pupils spoke excitedly about a trip to the local church where they learned about the history of their village. Trips like these help pupils feel part of their local community. They also help pupils learn knowledge and skills they might apply to other learning.

p.2

2

From Reception to Year 6, pupils’ behaviour is courteous and kind. Staff instil the behaviours they wish to see in pupils. Collective worship is used to share stories that teach pupils about important traits, such as trying new things and not giving up. Pupils like the recognition they receive in the weekly assembly for demonstrating these behaviours.

p.2

2

There are respectful relationships among leaders, staff and parents. Parents appreciate the kindness staff show them and their children. One parent summed up the thoughts of many in saying, ‘The school may be small, but it definitely has a big heart.’ Parents remarked particularly on the support they and their children received from staff during periods of remote learning. Staff say they feel valued by leaders. They say leaders will organise training to help staff achieve their career goals. Governors check regularly that school leaders and their staff are being supported well to manage their workload.

p.2

2

In discussion with the headteacher, the inspectors agreed that early reading and the role of governance may usefully serve as a focus for the next inspection. 3 February 2022

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders arrange informative training for staff. Staff say the weekly meeting focusing on aspects of safeguarding helps them remain vigilant. They know what to look for to identify a pupil at risk of harm. Staff swiftly report their concerns. Leaders follow up on these concerns appropriately. Leaders manage support for vulnerable pupils and their families well. Pupils say they feel comfortable raising concerns in school. They say they can talk to a trusted adult about their worries or write and share them with the ‘worry monster’ for their teacher to read.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders ensure the necessary checks are completed on those individuals working or volunteering in the school. There were some issues regarding checks on agency staff, but leaders addressed these during the inspection.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The recently adopted early reading programme is in the initial stages of implementation. Not all staff have received the training to implement it well. Some pupils receive books they cannot read. Leaders must ensure all staff receive training to ensure they teach and assess pupils’ reading accurately and to a high standard, providing pupils with books that will help them become proficient readers.  Governors know what improvements they want leaders to make to the school, while their systems for checking these are happening, they lack rigour. Leaders’ plans for improvement do not have the necessary precision. Governors cannot use these plans to hold school leaders to account effectively for school improvement. Leaders, including governors, must make sure that they share precise priorities for school improvement. Governors must also make sure that plans for development include clear, measurable targets against which governors can check the effectiveness of leaders’ work to bring

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called a section 8 inspection of a good or outstanding school, because it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on a section 8 inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a section 5 inspection. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the section 8 inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the section 8 inspection as a section 5 inspection immediately. 3 February 2022

p.3

4

This is the second section 8 inspection since we judged the school to be good in June 2012.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 3 February 2022

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Website www.prestonjmi.herts.sch.uk Date of previous inspection 14 March 2017, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 Preston Primary School is a Church of England school. It is part of the Diocese of St Albans.  The religious character of the school was inspected under section 48 of the Education Act (2005) in October 2017 and was judged to be good.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, the special educational needs coordinator, a representative from the local authority, a representative from the diocese and several governors.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics and history.  For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, looked at curriculum plans, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their 3 February 2022

p.5

6

learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The lead inspector also heard several pupils read to a familiar adult.  The lead inspector reviewed a range of school documentation and policies, including minutes of governing body meetings, reports from external advisers, the school’s self- evaluation form and the school improvement plan.  To inspect safeguarding, the lead inspector met with the designated safeguarding lead and reviewed records. The lead inspector met with the school secretary to scrutinise the single central record of recruitment and vetting checks. Inspectors also spoke with governors, staff and pupils.  Inspectors spent time observing and speaking to pupils, including those who attend the before-school club.  Inspectors gathered parents’ views by reviewing the 38 responses and 29 free-text responses submitted to the online survey, Ofsted Parent View.  Inspectors gathered staff members’ views by speaking to several of them.

p.6

Inspection team

Daniel Short, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Charlie Fordham Her Majesty’s Inspector 3 February 2022

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion