Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Manor Park Church of England First School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
10 Feb 2022
- Inspectors verified
Debbie Tregellas, Julie Carrington, Kathy Maddocks
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
DT1 2BH
- Name on report verified
Manor Park Church of England First School
- URN verified
113791
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Weak leadership decisions have resulted in poor behaviour escalating. p.3
- However, in Reception senior leaders do not set high expectations for staff, and the curriculum is weaker. p.3
- However, this is not addressing the root causes of the weak leadership over time that have led to a sharp decline in the school’s effectiveness. p.2
- This puts pupils and staff in unsafe situations. p.2
- There are widespread weaknesses in leadership. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Governors must take urgent action to ensure that leaders protect pupils and staff from harm by managing any dangerous behaviour of pupils appropriately. p.4
- Governors must ensure that staff get the safeguarding training they need as a matter of urgency so that all safeguarding practices are compliant and understood. p.4
- They must hold staff to account to ensure that curriculum time is being maximised across the school day. p.4
- Pupils do not gain the detailed knowledge and skills they should across the curriculum. p.2
- Some pupils, including those in Ark class, do not make the progress across the curriculum that they should. 9 and 10 February 2022 p.2
- Fundamental checks that should be in place are not. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance31
“Weak leadership decisions have resulted in poor behaviour escalating.” p.3Teaching & assessment6
“However, some teaching does not consistently build on what pupils already know.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,421
- about usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Manor Park Church of England First School Mellstock Avenue, Dorchester, Dorset DT1 2BH
p.1
Inspection dates: 9 and 10 February 2022
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 9 and 10 February 2022
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
There are widespread weaknesses in leadership. Staff are working to improve the curriculum pupils receive. As a result, many pupils, including some pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), are learning more now than in the past. However, the quality of education is not good. Pupils do not gain the detailed knowledge and skills they should across the curriculum.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils with the most complex needs do not have beneficial educational experiences. Over time they have not received the support they need. A minority of pupils’ poor behaviour continues to escalate. When this happens, it puts these pupils, other pupils and staff at risk.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Expectations of pupils’ behaviour are far too low. Pupils do not have clear boundaries in place. Too many pupils do not show respect. Pupils do try hard to communicate their needs when things are proving difficult for them. For example, pupils talk openly about regular incidents of poor behaviour. Some pupils have come to accept that rough play happens. However, pupils say that when bullying happens they know staff will help.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Increasing pupils’ physical fitness is a top priority for the school. Pupils like getting outside and keeping fit and healthy.
p.2
better?
Leaders show limited capacity to improve the school. They have not identified the extent of the school’s weaknesses. Fundamental problems are not challenged or dealt with adequately. Governors are undertaking work to improve staff well-being. However, this is not addressing the root causes of the weak leadership over time that have led to a sharp decline in the school’s effectiveness.
p.2
better?
When problems arise, leaders react and deal with them. However, leaders do not think important decisions through. This puts pupils and staff in unsafe situations. Leaders ask staff to lead aspects of the school’s work without sufficient training. Inexperienced staff try to make the best of it but are not having the impact required.
p.2
better?
Leaders do not support staff to manage behaviour successfully. A minority of pupils behave dangerously. Some staff are unclear of expectations or do not uphold them. Transitions between lessons are slow. This wastes learning time in some classes.
p.2
better?
Leaders are using extensive local authority support to improve the provision for pupils with SEND. However, it is early days. Some pupils, including those in Ark class, do not make the progress across the curriculum that they should. 9 and 10 February 2022
p.2
3
While most pupils experience a wide range of subjects, a minority of the most vulnerable pupils do not have equal access to the curriculum. Over time leaders and governors have not promoted equality of opportunity. Pupils who attend Ark class do not receive a rich set of experiences to help them learn and thrive. Leaders and governors are receiving external support to bring about improvement, but this work is in its infancy. These pupils do not have access to the curriculum they need.
p.3
3
The consistent approach to teaching reading ensures that pupils at the early stages of reading have lots of opportunities to practise their sounds and read aloud to adults. Pupils’ books match the sounds that they already know. This is helping many pupils to read with increased accuracy. Most pupils from Years 1 to 4 develop their vocabulary and application of phonics to spell well. In mathematics, the curriculum is improving. Increasingly, pupils are becoming fluent in number, including multiplication tables. However, some teaching does not consistently build on what pupils already know. This hinders some pupils’ progress across the curriculum.
p.3
3
The curriculum in Nursery has improved. These children get off to a strong start. However, in Reception senior leaders do not set high expectations for staff, and the curriculum is weaker. Elsewhere in the school the wider curriculum is developing steadily. For example, in physical education (PE), the curriculum outlines what pupils will know and do. Pupils, however, have considerable gaps in their knowledge and skills. This subject was not a priority in the past. In some other subjects pupils are beginning to learn more.
p.3
3
Staff provide caring support, but this does not help some pupils develop their character and resilience. Pupils do not have sufficient knowledge of and respect for people’s different faiths, feelings and values. This does not prepare pupils well for life in modern Britain.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders carry out pre-employment checks on adults working within the school. Staff know how to recognise signs of abuse or neglect. Staff apply their training and raise concerns in a timely way. Staff make detailed records of any concerns. Leaders take action and work with external agencies appropriately.
p.3
Safeguarding
However, governors have not ensured that some safeguarding procedures are in place or kept up to date. Leaders do not think through their decisions to support pupils’ safety and well-being effectively. Weak leadership decisions have resulted in poor behaviour escalating. Poor behaviour is common. Pupils and staff are put at risk. Pupils do not have a clear enough understanding about keeping safe. 9 and 10 February 2022
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Leaders do not understand or have full oversight of safeguarding arrangements. The culture of safeguarding is not secure. Fundamental checks that should be in place are not. This puts pupils and staff at risk. Governors must ensure that staff get the safeguarding training they need as a matter of urgency so that all safeguarding practices are compliant and understood. Over time, leaders have failed to ensure that a minority of pupils’ pastoral and academic needs are met. Consequently, pupils demonstrate dangerous behaviours in school. Leaders have allowed pupils’ poor behaviour to escalate over time. Staff are not appropriately trained. Governors must take urgent action to ensure that leaders protect pupils and staff from harm by managing any dangerous behaviour of pupils appropriately. Leaders must ensure that staff training is effective, and staff have strong subject knowledge so that pupils can gain equal access to an
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
appropriate curriculum and the root causes of any dangerous behaviours are addressed. Leaders do not ensure that staff consistently model and expect high expectations. Staff accept pupils’ lax behaviour at transition times. Governors must ensure that leaders communicate high expectations to all staff. They must hold staff to account to ensure that curriculum time is being maximised across the school day. Leaders are only part of the way through their work to develop the wider curriculum. Some pupils have gaps in their knowledge and understanding. Pupils, including those with SEND, do not learn enough in every subject. Governors need to hold leaders to account for ensuring that staff deliver all the essential curriculum content pupils need in order to gain the knowledge they should in every subject. Teaching is not adapted to meet pupils’ needs sufficiently well. Some curriculum sequences are not demanding enough over time. Pupils’ misconceptions are not
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
addressed sufficiently well. Leaders need to assure themselves that staff use all the information they have about what pupils know already so that teaching meets pupils needs well, and pupils are well prepared for their next stage. There are weaknesses in the implementation of the curriculum in Reception. Some adult interactions with children do not support children’s learning well enough. Leaders need to ensure that the curriculum supports all children in the early years to learn well across all the curriculum so that they are well prepared for their onward education. The curriculum for pupils’ personal development is not implemented well. Pupils lack the pastoral support they need. Pupils do not appreciate different religions and cultures and beliefs. Leaders must ensure that pupils receive rich experiences through which they can learn and thrive. Leaders and those responsible for governance may not appoint early career
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
teachers before the next monitoring inspection. 9 and 10 February 2022
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.5
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 9 and 10 February 2022
p.5
School details
Inspection number 10201000 Type of school First
p.6
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.6
School details
Date of previous inspection 21 November 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.6
Information about this school
The school uses one unregistered and one registered alternative provider. There have been many changes to staffing, including leadership, since the previous inspection. There are 15 classes. One class called The Ark is for children from Years 1 to 4 who find it difficult to learn alongside their peers. The school has a pre-school that accepts two- and three-year-olds. The school is receiving external support through team around the school (TAS) meetings. School leaders, governors and members of the local authority are involved in these meetings.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
Information about this inspection
In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons 9 and 10 February 2022
p.6
7
responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school.
p.7
7
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors held discussions with the headteacher, senior leaders and other school staff and examined a range of documents including the school’s action plans. An inspector met with the chair of the governing body and two representatives of Dorset local authority. The inspection team carried out deep dives in these subjects: reading, science, mathematics, history and PE. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning, and considered samples of pupils’ work. An inspector listened to pupils in Years 1 and 2 read to an adult. Inspectors also looked more widely at the curriculum. They examined pupils’ work
p.7
7
and talked to pupils about their work and school life. An inspector met with the special educational needs coordinator and deputy headteacher to consider the quality of provision for pupils with SEND. Inspectors considered how well the school protects pupils and keeps them safe. Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school site. Inspectors considered responses to the Ofsted staff and pupil surveys alongside responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Ofsted Parent View, including free-text responses from parents and carers. Inspectors also met with parents during the inspection and reviewed additional correspondence from parents.
p.7
Inspection team
Julie Carrington, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Kathy Maddocks Her Majesty’s Inspector 9 and 10 February 2022
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion