Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)
Raysfield Pre-school Playgroup
Summary
Karen Allen (lead), Lisa Large
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Raysfield Playgroup Committee
- Group reference verified
RP907545
- Inspection date verified
8 Mar 2022
- Inspectors AI-checked
Karen Allen, Lisa Large
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
BS37 6JZ
- Name on report verified
Raysfield Pre-school Playgroup
- URN verified
136065
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- For example, pre-school children enjoy playing independently in the mud kitchen and toddlers are confident to engage with unfamiliar adults and make them breakfast and lunch, using the toy food. p.3
- provide children with effective support and guidance to help them understand positive behaviour expectations 23/03/2022 p.5
- implement effective staff supervision procedures to monitor all staff practice and provide effective support, coaching and training 23/03/2022 p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Weaknesses in implementing risk assessment procedures and ineffective staff deployment and supervision of children, compromise children's safety and welfare. p.4
- These failures put children at significant risk of harm. p.4
- These failures put children at risk of choking. p.3
- These weaknesses in safeguarding children significantly compromise children's safety and welfare. p.2
- These weaknesses compromise children's enjoyment, learning and development. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff know the reporting procedures to follow should they have any concerns about a child or an adult working on the premises. p.4
- Staff do not receive the support, coaching and training they need to enable them to meet children's needs. p.2
- The special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) liaises with other professionals to identify appropriate interventions to help children with additional needs to catch up. p.3
- However, staff do not receive the training and support they need to help them meet children's individual learning and development needs. p.3
- 8 March 2022 ensure that the designated safeguarding lead (DSL) understands their responsibility and is capable of fulfilling their role to notify the local authority designated officer (LADO) and Ofsted should any allegations be made against adults working at the setting 23/03/2022 p.4
- Children do not receive the support they need to help them understand positive behaviour expectations. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families7
“Some parents say the quality at the setting has recently declined.” p.3Leadership & governance4
“The management committee has failed to monitor the quality of the provision sufficiently.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 1,580
- longer than usual (typical 972)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Raysfield Pre-school Playgroup Dodington Parish Hall, Finch Road, Chipping Sodbury, BRISTOL BS37 6JZ
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
The provision is inadequate
The management committee has failed to monitor the quality of the provision sufficiently. The manager and staff do not fulfil their roles and responsibilities to promote children's welfare. Recruitment processes are not robust to ensure staff are suitable to fulfil their roles. The manager and staff fail to implement the setting's risk assessment procedures to keep children safe. They do not ensure that staff are well deployed or that children are supervised effectively at all times. This means children's individual needs are not met.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Children are eager to explore resources, but most learning is incidental. The curriculum is not well designed to help children make good progress. The manager and staff have an insufficient understanding of what they want children to learn. The manager does not act upon concerns raised by staff. Staff do not receive the support, coaching and training they need to enable them to meet children's needs. Staff do not plan purposeful and challenging activities that help children to achieve across all areas of learning. Children, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), spend long periods of time with limited interaction with staff and play alone or wander aimlessly. Children do not receive the support they need to help them understand positive behaviour expectations. In addition, additional funding is not being used appropriately to support children. These weaknesses compromise children's enjoyment, learning and development.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Staff are friendly and demonstrate they are caring. Some children show they are happy and settled. For instance, toddlers enjoy exploring foam and cereal in trays and staff engage with them and support them well during this activity.
p.2
need to do better?
n Children's safety and welfare are compromised. The manager does not follow safer recruitment procedures to ensure staff are suitable for their role. The manager, who is also the designated safeguarding lead (DSL), does not follow the correct safeguarding procedures to inform the local authority designated officer (LADO) or Ofsted when allegations are made against staff. This puts children at significant risk of harm. n Risk assessments are not effective in reducing risks to children. The manager and staff do not always ensure that the entrance doors to the premises are secured when children are present. This means that individuals can access children without challenge from staff or children can leave unsupervised. The manager fails to implement the setting's mobile phone policy effectively. Additionally, staff take home the setting's electronic tablets, which contain photos of children. Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) footage of children is also
p.2
need to do better?
taken home by managers and on occasion CCTV footage is viewed from home.
p.2
need to do better?
8 March 2022 This means that individuals outside of the nursery could have access to images and footage of children. Parents are not made aware of this practice when they sign to give consent for images to be taken and CCTV footage to be recorded. Staff do not supervise children sufficiently to ensure their well-being. These weaknesses in safeguarding children significantly compromise children's safety and welfare. n The management committee does not act quickly enough when they receive a written complaint about the provision. They do not investigate a complaint promptly and do not notify the complainant of the outcome within the required timescales. n The management committee does not ensure that the base rooms are set up to support children's enjoyment, learning and development from the time that children arrive. Resources and activities are not available for children when they arrive. This results in them running around the main hall, receiving little
p.2
need to do better?
interaction from the manager and staff. n Staff fail to deploy themselves effectively and do not supervise children adequately at all times to help keep them safe. Staff do not support children effectively to behave well. For example, when outdoors, staff do not notice that children push and fall off plastic crates onto each other until children start to cry. When toddlers hit each other trying to get to the books indoors, staff do not help children to understand what is expected of them. n Staff in the baby room struggle to meet all children's needs. For instance, they do not notice that children with additional needs lie upside down in the soft-play corner and drink from a bottle. Staff sit with their backs to babies in high chairs who are eating their lunch while they tend to other children. These failures put children at risk of choking. n Children do not receive enough support to develop their communication and
p.3
need to do better?
language skills. Toddlers engage in small group activities, where they sing songs and select items out of a bucket. However, some children wander around the rooms with dummies in their mouths for long periods of time. This hinders their language development. n The special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) liaises with other professionals to identify appropriate interventions to help children with additional needs to catch up. She completes individual education plans for children, which she reviews regularly and shares these with parents and staff. However, staff do not receive the training and support they need to help them meet children's individual learning and development needs. This means some children do not make adequate progress from their starting points. n Children have opportunities to sing songs, share books and listen to stories. Most pre-school children enjoyed a story about 'Superworm'. Staff read with
p.3
need to do better?
good intonation and ask some children questions about the story. However, staff tend to focus on the more confident and vocal children, which does not support the learning of others. Pre-school staff expect children to sit for excessively long periods and, as a result, children lose focus and become disengaged. n Staff do not promote children's good health well enough. For example, they do not change children's nappies on outings to the local soft-play centre. They do not ensure that all toddlers are given a drink with their meal at lunchtime.
p.3
need to do better?
8 March 2022 Children develop some physical skills. They enjoy being physically active indoors and outdoors. They develop their muscles, for instance, as they ride on tricycles, climb and balance in the outdoor area. Children show good coordination skills as they sit with staff and take turns to complete jigsaw puzzles. n Children have opportunities to be creative and to develop their imaginations. For example, pre-school children enjoy playing independently in the mud kitchen and toddlers are confident to engage with unfamiliar adults and make them breakfast and lunch, using the toy food. n Parents drop off and collect their children from the door. Parents say they receive information about their children's time at the setting through an online application. However, some parents are not informed about changes to key persons. Some parents say the quality at the setting has recently declined. Therefore, they would not recommend it to others.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.4
Safeguarding
The management committee does not monitor practice well enough to ensure that all staff fulfil their role to keep children safe and support their welfare. The manager, who is also the designated safeguarding lead, and the deputy manager, who is the also the deputy designated safeguarding lead, have failed to notify the LADO of an allegation made against a member of staff.
p.4
Safeguarding
Although the manager has completed safer recruitment training, she has failed to implement robust vetting procedures to ensure all staff's suitability to work with children. These failures put children at significant risk of harm.
p.4
Safeguarding
Weaknesses in implementing risk assessment procedures and ineffective staff deployment and supervision of children, compromise children's safety and welfare.
p.4
Safeguarding
Staff know the reporting procedures to follow should they have any concerns about a child or an adult working on the premises.
p.4
Due date
8 March 2022 ensure that the designated safeguarding lead (DSL) understands their responsibility and is capable of fulfilling their role to notify the local authority designated officer (LADO) and Ofsted should any allegations be made against adults working at the setting 23/03/2022
p.4
Due date
ensure that all staff implement effective e-safety procedures to safeguard children, with particular regards to the use of mobile phones, electronic tablets and CCTV footage 23/03/2022
p.5
Due date
ensure that the premises are secure at all times children are present, to prevent unauthorised persons entering the premises and to ensure that children are not able to leave the premises unsupervised 23/03/2022
p.5
Due date
provide staff with guidance, training and coaching to enable them to effectively support all children with additional needs 23/03/2022
p.5
Due date
ensure staff implement effective risk assessment procedures to minimise any potential risks to children 23/03/2022
p.5
Due date
ensure recruitment and vetting procedures are robust to ensure staff suitability for their role 23/03/2022
p.5
Due date
ensure that staff are deployed effectively and supervise children at all times, to keep children safe and to meet their individual needs 23/03/2022
p.5
Due date
provide children with effective support and guidance to help them understand positive behaviour expectations 23/03/2022
p.5
Due date
implement effective staff supervision procedures to monitor all staff practice and provide effective support, coaching and training 23/03/2022
p.5
Due date
8 March 2022 ensure that staff promote children's health effectively, with particular regard to changing children's nappies on outings and providing all children with drinks at lunchtime 23/03/2022
p.5
Due date
ensure that all written complaints made by parents and/or carers are investigated and acted upon, and that the complainant is notified of the outcome of the investigation within 28 days of having received the complaint. 23/03/2022
p.6
Due date
plan and implement a curriculum that meets the learning needs of all children 22/04/2022
p.6
Due date
ensure purposeful and challenging activities are available, tailored to support children's next steps in learning 22/04/2022
p.6
Due date
provide staff with effective training, support and coaching to improve the quality of their interactions with children. 20/05/2022
p.6
Setting details
Unique reference number 136065 Local authority South Gloucestershire Inspection number 10221313 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises
p.7
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Full day care
p.7
inspection
Total number of places 28 Number of children on roll 68 Name of registered person Raysfield Playgroup Committee
p.7
reference number
Telephone number 01454 324688 or 07716820540 Date of previous inspection 14 June 2018
p.7
Information about this early years setting
Raysfield Pre-school Playgroup registered in 1996. It operates from Dodington Parish Hall, South Gloucestershire. The pre-school is open from 8am to 4pm from Monday to Friday, during school term times. The pre-school employs 14 members of staff. The manager and six other staff hold relevant early years qualifications at level 3, one staff member is an early years teacher, one holds an early years qualification at level 6, and five staff are unqualified. The pre-school receives funding to provide early years education for children aged two, three and four years.
p.7
Inspection activities
n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n We carried out this inspection as a result of a risk assessment, following information we received about the provider. n The manager, the deputy manager and the inspectors completed a learning walk together and discussed the early years curriculum. n The inspectors spoke with parents and staff at appropriate times and took account of their views. n The manager and the deputy manager each carried out a joint observation with an inspector. n The inspectors met with a management committee member and spoke about the leadership and management of the setting. n The inspectors met with the manager, deputy manager and coordinator and looked at relevant documentation, including staff suitability checks.
p.8
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.8
Inspection activities
8 March 2022 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.9
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.9
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion