Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
St Leonard's Catholic School, Durham
Summary
James Duncan (lead), Eleanor Belfield, Graham Findlay, Kirsty Godfrey, Malcolm Kirtley, Richard Jones
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
27 Jan 2022
- Inspectors verified
Eleanor Belfield, Graham Findlay, James Duncan, Kirsty Godfrey, Malcolm Kirtley, Richard Jones
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management AI-checked
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
DH1 4NG
- Name on report verified
St Leonard’s Catholic School
- URN verified
143583
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Nevertheless, these shortcomings are a legitimate concern for some parents. p.3
- As a result, some of the information that the school holds on these pupils is out of date, and appropriate adaptations to school life are not always being made. p.3
- The programme to support pupils who struggle to read lacks precision. p.4
- Some aspects of school improvement lack effective oversight and monitoring. p.4
- Incidents of poor behaviour are infrequent. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Work must commence to ensure that all leaders, and those responsible for governance, understand their respective roles and perform these in a way that enhances the effectiveness of the school, ensuring that statutory duties are fulfilled. p.4
- Leaders and those responsible for governance must embed improvements in their quality assurance work, not least linked to the provision for pupils with SEND. p.4
- Leaders must review the way in which pupils are identified for this help, monitor the effectiveness of the support, and ensure that those delivering this support are appropriately trained. p.4
- Leaders must engage more effectively with parents and the wider community in a way that cohesively supports pupils’ education. 26 and 27 January 2022 p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance24
“Some aspects of school improvement lack effective oversight and monitoring.” p.4Records & policies5
“School policies have not always been reviewed regularly.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,402
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 54, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 24%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of St Leonard’s Catholic School North End, Durham DH1 4NG
p.1
Inspection dates: 26 and 27 January 2022
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Sixth-form provision Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 26 and 27 January 2022
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The experiences that pupils have at St Leonard’s are contrasting. Most attend regularly, enjoy learning and have good relationships with their teachers. However, some pupils, notably those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), encounter less consistency. Their needs are not fully identified and understood, and as a result, the support in place for them lacks precision.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school environment is calm and controlled. Incidents of poor behaviour are infrequent. Within lessons, pupils are engaged and focused. Teachers do not accept passivity from pupils. Teachers are knowledgeable and committed. Despite having lacked direction from leaders of SEND, learning support assistants also enhance pupils’ learning.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils feel safe. They do not think that bullying is a problem. When it happens, they know whom to talk to and trust that it will be sorted out quickly. This is in line with school records. Pupils wear their uniform with pride. They respect each other, and the school surroundings. Older pupils are involved in the school’s delivery of important topics, such as those linked to equality and diversity.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils have access to a wide range of subjects and extra-curricular activities. However, it is not clear to what extent all pupils are benefiting from these opportunities.
p.2
better?
There are many strengths to this school. Many pupils have a seamless experience here. However, in some respects, leaders’ effectiveness in driving whole-school improvement has been inconsistent and has lacked sufficient rigour and coherence. This has not been helped by the high levels of staff turnover that leaders have had to manage.
p.2
better?
Leaders have identified some of the weaknesses in the school and worked to address these. However, some aspects of strategic oversight are vague. Improving some areas, such as the school’s provision for pupils with SEND, has not been appropriately prioritised by leaders. Although improving, the approach for supporting disadvantaged pupils has not always been cohesive. School policies have not always been reviewed regularly. Until recently, those with responsibility for governance have not challenged leaders on matters such as these. They have not fully evaluated these aspects of the school. Their knowledge of current priorities for school improvement varies.
p.2
better?
The new chair of governors and colleagues from the multi-academy trust (MAT) are now taking a more active role in supporting leaders with school improvement. One stakeholder described the school as ‘a sleeping giant’, a comment that resonated with the inspection team, who recognise the school’s capacity to improve. Staff are 26 and 27 January 2022
p.2
3
fully committed to the school and its leaders. Staff say that leaders are very mindful of their well-being and workload. They enjoy working at the school.
p.3
3
The curriculum structure is well thought through, including in the sixth form. Pupils access a wide range of challenging subjects in all year groups. Pupils benefit from well-sequenced lessons, delivered by passionate and committed teachers. Low-level poor behaviour is not tolerated by staff, and consequently lessons have a real sense of purpose. Leaders have high academic ambitions for pupils, including those students in the sixth form.
p.3
3
Pupils have a good understanding of what they have been taught. Most pupils have the knowledge and skills needed to succeed in their next stage of education, employment or training. This is less so for pupils with SEND. In addition, the small number of pupils who are not confident readers are not supported as effectively as they could be.
p.3
3
Plans to deliver personal, social, health and economic education (PSHE) have recently been updated. Pupils receive important lessons about growing up in modern Britain. They are taught about the risks they may face in life. Pupils are now taught about the importance of healthy relationships, and diversity and equality. Sixth-form students have opportunities to be involved in the delivery of this to younger pupils. Leaders have not, however, consulted with parents and carers prior to the teaching of a new relationships and sex education (RSE) curriculum.
p.3
3
More widely, leaders have not engaged with parents as actively or effectively as they might when taking steps to improve the school. This has led to significant frustration in some quarters. Leaders do not regularly canvass opinions, and methods of communication between home and school are sometimes fragmented. It does not help that some information on the school website is out of date.
p.3
3
Leaders have not always involved parents in the statutory reviews of pupils with more complex needs. Owing to both internal and external factors, there have also been a series of delays with many of these reviews. As a result, some of the information that the school holds on these pupils is out of date, and appropriate adaptations to school life are not always being made. A new special educational needs coordinator, very recently appointed, has plans to address these shortcomings. Nevertheless, these shortcomings are a legitimate concern for some parents.
p.3
3
The school meets the requirements of the Baker Clause, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. However, some older pupils want even more information on the options open to them after life at school.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 26 and 27 January 2022
p.3
4
School leaders have recently been supported by the new chair of governors and colleagues from the MAT to improve operating procedures in order to ensure that these are more effective. These improvements include ensuring that procedures are followed, without ambiguity, when reporting concerns and seeking advice.
p.4
4
Records show that leaders undertake all statutory checks on new members of staff. All staff are clear about the importance of safeguarding. They receive regular training. They know the signs to be aware of when children may need support. Pupils spoken to also told us that they felt safe. They know whom to go to if they have concerns. They told us that they are confident they would be listened to, and that their concerns would be addressed.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
There is a lack of clarity about priorities for school improvement. Leaders do not always focus on the areas of school that need most attention. Although leaders’ attention has recently focused on responding to the pandemic, it is currently unclear who is responsible for leading some important initiatives. Work must commence to ensure that all leaders, and those responsible for governance, understand their respective roles and perform these in a way that enhances the effectiveness of the school, ensuring that statutory duties are fulfilled. Some aspects of school improvement lack effective oversight and monitoring. This is particularly the case with the provision for pupils with SEND. As a result, some pupils are not getting the support to which they are entitled. Leaders and those responsible for governance must embed improvements in their quality assurance work, not least linked to the provision for pupils with SEND.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The programme to support pupils who struggle to read lacks precision. Some pupils are not receiving the support they need in order to become confident readers. Leaders must review the way in which pupils are identified for this help, monitor the effectiveness of the support, and ensure that those delivering this support are appropriately trained. Parents are not always fully involved in their child’s experiences at school. The school has not consulted with parents about its new RSE curriculum. Parents of pupils with SEND have varying levels of involvement in their child’s regular reviews. Some parents find it difficult to get the answers to the questions they raise when they contact the school. Leaders must engage more effectively with parents and the wider community in a way that cohesively supports pupils’ education. 26 and 27 January 2022
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.5
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 26 and 27 January 2022
p.5
School details
Number of pupils on the school roll 1,386
p.6
sixth form
Chair of board of trustees Martin Gannon
p.6
sixth form
Chair of governing body James Cunningham
p.6
Date of previous inspection
9 and 10 October 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.6
Information about this school
St Leonard’s Catholic School joined the Bishop Wilkinson Catholic Education Trust on 1 April 2020. The new chair of governors took up post during the autumn term of 2021. As the school is designated as having a religious character, it is inspected under section 48 of the Education Act 2005, most recently in November 2017. The timescales for reinspection have been extended in the light of the pandemic. The school does not currently use any alternative provision.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 on 18 January 2022. Additional evidence was gathered on 26 January 2022. At this stage, the inspection was deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act. 26 and 27 January 2022
p.6
7
This was the first routine inspection the school had received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders, and have taken that into account in their evaluation.
p.7
7
Inspectors met with the headteacher and other senior leaders. They also met the chair of governors, other governors and the chief executive officer of the MAT. Telephone conversations were held with a representative of Durham local authority and a representative of the Diocese of Hexham and Newcastle. To evaluate the quality of education, inspectors conducted deep dives in English, computer science, art and geography. This involved meeting with subject leaders, looking at curriculum plans, reviewing pupils’ work, talking to pupils about their work, and talking to teachers. The school’s PSHE curriculum, including plans for teaching RSE, was also reviewed. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors met leaders with responsibility for safeguarding. They reviewed the actions taken to keep pupils safe, and reviewed several case files. They also reviewed the way in which the school handles allegations against adults. The checks that the school makes when
p.7
7
appointing new staff were reviewed. Inspectors talked to a wide range of pupils and staff about safeguarding. Inspectors also examined staff training records. Inspectors scrutinised a wide range of documentation, including policies for behaviour, safeguarding and SEND. They reviewed the school’s records of behaviour and bullying incidents, and spoke to pupils about their experiences. This inspection was carried out following complaints made to Ofsted that raised serious concerns. Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector decided that an inspection of the school should take place to follow up the whole-school issues that were raised. Inspectors initially sought to establish whether leaders were taking effective action to secure a robust safeguarding culture.
p.7
Inspection team
James Duncan, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Eleanor Belfield Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Malcolm Kirtley Her Majesty’s Inspector 26 and 27 January 2022
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion