Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's home run by Witherslack Group Limited

Inspected 16 Feb 2022 · URN 2594902

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

RI to be good

Clare Nixson (lead), Wendy Anderson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Witherslack Group Ltd

  • Inspection date verified

    16 Feb 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Clare Nixson, Wendy Anderson

  • Helped and protected verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Name on report verified

    2594902

  • URN verified

    2594902

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRI to be good
  • Helped and protectedRI to be good
  • Leadership and managementRI to be good

13% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement to be good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−40Criticalmore positive than 32% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement to be good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement to be good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisesafeclearstrongseriousfailuresenjoywarmimproved
Criticismnot alwaysharmat riskrequires improvementconcernsinsufficientinconsistentlacking

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1008w−39
  • What needs to improve680w−38

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
1,687
about usual (typical 1899)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 50
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 48%What needs to improve 32%About the inspection 20%

Full report text

Inspection report for children’s home: 2594902 1 Registered provider: Witherslack Group Ltd Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this children’s home

The home provides care for up to five children who may have social and emotional difficulties. The home is operated by a private provider.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

The manager has been registered with Ofsted since 21 September 2020.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

Due to COVID-19, at the request of the Secretary of State, we suspended all routine inspections of social care providers carried out under the social care common inspection framework (SCCIF) on 17 March 2020. We returned to routine SCCIF inspections on 12 April 2021.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

We last visited this setting on 25 February 2021 to carry out a monitoring visit. The report is published on the Ofsted website.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

requires improvement to be good

How well children and young people are helped and protected requires improvement to be good

p.1

requires improvement to be good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good

p.1

requires improvement to be good

The children’s home is not yet delivering good help and care for children and young people. However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted.

p.1

requires improvement to be good

Overall judgement at last inspection: not applicable

p.1

requires improvement to be good

Enforcement action since last inspection: not applicable Inspection report for children’s home: 2594902 2

p.1

Recent inspection history

Not previously inspected Inspection report for children’s home: 2594902 3

p.2

improvement to be good

Children have mixed experiences living in the home. Staff encourage children to lead an active, healthy lifestyle. Children enjoy a wide range of interests, including music, horse riding and swimming. Children decorate their own rooms to reflect their interests. Staff support children to see people who are important to them. Children retain strong links to family and other carers. Feedback from family is mixed. One family member feels that the home is supporting their child well. Another has concerns about the home not meeting their child’s needs and is worried about significant staff turnover.

p.3

improvement to be good

Children attend the school attached to the home. Staff encourage good attendance and help children to achieve educationally. Staff show pride in the achievements that children make. For example, staff described how one child has been supported to develop their reading abilities. Staff meet children’s health needs. Staff supported children when they had COVID-19 and prevented further spread. The home continues to take appropriate precautions against further infection.

p.3

improvement to be good

Staff support children to develop their relationships with each other. Children take an interest in each other’s lives. During the inspection, two children went with another child to support them in their joining ceremony at a local club. However, interactions between children are not always positive. The manager identifies that there is bullying within the home and is undertaking work to address this.

p.3

improvement to be good

Children see their peers being restrained. Debriefs completed with children highlight the impact that this has on them. For example, this includes comments about disrupted sleep and delays to planned trips out. At times, children become involved in restraints, trying to intervene with their peers.

p.3

improvement to be good

The manager regularly seeks children’s views about living in the home. The manager responds promptly to complaints from children, providing responses in a way they can understand. However, the content of the complaints further shows the worries some children have about living with each other in the home.

p.3

improvement to be good

Staff create a warm and welcoming home environment that is decorated to a good standard. However, children are not able to access all areas of their home. The staff office is not accessible to children. Inability to enter the office can lead to unnecessary conflict between staff and children. Some food is locked away in a cupboard in the kitchen, meaning children cannot learn how to moderate their food intake in the same way as their peers would. The manager gives a reason for this but does not recognise the impact on children or how it will improve. Inspection report for children’s home: 2594902 4

p.3

improvement to be good

Children’s experiences of living in the home are negatively affected through the approach to behaviour management. Although there has been a significant reduction in the number of incidents of restraint in the home, restraint continues to be used for all children. Staff records of restraints are of inconsistent quality, sometimes lacking details of which staff are involved and how. Behaviour support plans contain insufficient detail to identify which restraint techniques are appropriate for children. In addition, reduction strategies lack clarity of action for staff to take. Debriefs completed with children have improved and now contain their words. However, it is not always clear enough in the record who has conducted the debrief. Suggestions from children in debriefs are not always incorporated in their support plans.

p.4

improvement to be good

Some children can not be safely left together without staff supervision. More work is required to ensure that children are well matched; that they do not harm each other and that they can live safely together.

p.4

improvement to be good

The manager clearly records safeguarding concerns. The manager consults safeguarding authorities when allegations are made against staff. Risk assessments identify what actions members of staff can and cannot take while investigations are undertaken. However, this is only in relation to the child making the allegation. As a result, other children in the home are not protected should an allegation be upheld.

p.4

good

The home is led by a qualified and experienced manager. Training for staff is relevant to their role. Staff receive regular supervision from the manager. However, supervision records do not always show that reflective discussions take place. In addition, they do not routinely contain information about discussions about all the children living in the home. Leaders and managers cover staff vacancies using staff from within the organisation, identifying continuity of staffing as beneficial for children.

p.4

good

Leaders and managers do not monitor use of restraint well enough to inform a plan for the reduction of its use across the home. The manager does not critically evaluate the necessity or proportionality of individual interventions or the quality of the recording. The manager does not comprehensively scrutinise restraint records to understand areas for staff development and learning. Most importantly, there is insufficient consideration of how incidents could have been managed differently to avoid the necessity of using a restraint.

p.4

good

Language in behaviour management plans, care plans and risk assessments lacks clarity, and terms used are sometimes vague. Authors of electronic versions of Inspection report for children’s home: 2594902 5 documents are not clearly marked. The manager started to make changes during the inspection in response to inspector feedback.

p.4

good

External professionals report positive progress is being made by their children and that communication is good. Social workers feel their children are safe and that staff understand and meet their needs. Inspection report for children’s home: 2594902 6

p.5

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.

p.6

Requirement Due date

The protection of children standard is that children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe.

p.6

Requirement Due date

In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure—

p.6

Requirement Due date

assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child’s relevant plans, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child;

p.6

Requirement Due date

have the skills to identify and act upon signs that a child is at risk of harm;

p.6

Requirement Due date

manage relationships between children to prevent them from harming each other;

p.6

Requirement Due date

that the home’s day-to-day care is arranged and delivered so as to keep each child safe and to protect each child effectively from harm. (Regulation 12 (1) (2)(a)(i)(iii)(iv)(b))

p.6

Requirement Due date

In particular, the registered manager should ensure that behaviour support plans are clear in terms of language and techniques used. The registered manager should undertake an ongoing assessment of the dynamics of children living together, to know that they are safe. They should ensure that risk assessments are clear about what staff can and cannot do when they are under investigation for an allegation, in line with the organisation’s policies. 4 March 2022

p.6

Requirement Due date

The leadership and management standard is that the registered person enables, inspires and leads a culture in relation to the children’s home that—

p.6

Requirement Due date

helps children aspire to fulfil their potential; and 25 March 2022 Inspection report for children’s home: 2594902 7 promotes their welfare.

p.6

Requirement Due date

In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to—

p.7

Requirement Due date

understand the impact that the quality of care provided in the home is having on the progress and experiences of each child and use this understanding to inform the development of the quality of care provided in the home;

p.7

Requirement Due date

use monitoring and review systems to make continuous improvements in the quality of care provided in the home. (Regulation 13 (1)(a)(b) (2)(f)(h))

p.7

Requirement Due date

In particular, the manager should critically review behaviour management practices, and include the information obtained to inform plans to reduce use of restraint.

p.7

Requirement Due date

The registered person must ensure that all employees—

p.7

Requirement Due date

receive practice-related supervision by a person with appropriate experience. (Regulation 33 (4)(b))

p.7

Requirement Due date

In particular, the manager should ensure that supervision records contain reference to practice related discussions, including discussions about all children in the home to provide the opportunity for staff to reflect on their practice. 25 March 2022

p.7

Requirement Due date

within 24 hours of the use of a measure of control, discipline or restraint in relation to a child in the home, a record is made which includes—

p.7

Requirement Due date

details of the child’s behaviour leading to the use of the measure;

p.7

Requirement Due date

a description of the measure and its duration;

p.7

Requirement Due date

the name of the person who used the measure ("the user"), and of any other person present when the measure was used;

p.7

Requirement Due date

the effectiveness and any consequences of the use of the measure; and 4 March 2022 Inspection report for children’s home: 2594902 8 within 5 days of the use of the measure, the registered person or the authorised person adds to the record confirmation that they have spoken to the child about the measure. (Regulation 35 (3)(a)(iv)(vi)(vii)(c)(iv))

p.7

Requirement Due date

In particular, the manager should ensure that staff records of incidents of restraint are clear about the role of staff involved in the restraint and include clear evaluation of the suitability of the use of the measure in line with the regulations. In addition, the manager should ensure there is clarity about who has undertaken a debrief with the child.

p.8

Recommendation

 The registered person should ensure that all children can access the shared parts of their home. Where restrictions are deemed necessary, this should be recorded clearly on all the plans of all children affected, including date of review and plans to reduce the restriction. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 15, paragraph 3.10)

p.8

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2594902 9

p.8

Children’s home details

Registered provider: Witherslack Group Ltd

p.9

Children’s home details

Registered provider address: Witherslack Group, Lupton Tower, Lupton, Carnforth LA6 2PR

p.9

Children’s home details

Responsible individual: Marcia McLoughlin

p.9

Inspectors

Clare Nixson, Social Care Inspector Wendy Anderson, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2594902 10 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.9

Inspectors

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspectors

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.10

Inspectors

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion