Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Frogmore Community College

Inspected 9 Feb 2022 · published 4 Apr 2022 · URN 116442

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mark Bagust (lead), Alan Johnson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    9 Feb 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Alan Johnson, Mark Bagust

  • Postcode verified

    GU46 6AG

  • Name on report verified

    Frogmore Community College

  • URN verified

    116442

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+8Mostly positivemore positive than 10% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveoutstandingambitiouswell designedvery highwell-plannedwell ledstrong
Criticismlackconcernsweaknessseriousseriouslyconcernnot sufficientlynot strong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1091w+5
  • Safeguarding70w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,159
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 57, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
5
typical 4
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%Safeguarding 4%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Frogmore Community College Potley Hill Road, Yateley, Hampshire GU46 6AG

p.1

Outcome

Frogmore Community College continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school is a happy and friendly place to learn. Pupils say they feel that they belong to the ‘Frogmore family’. They feel well supported and cared for by staff. Pupils say that everybody is welcomed and nobody is left out. They told inspectors that they like getting to know other pupils from different year groups in their tutor groups and that this helps to create the family atmosphere.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils take an active role in the running of the school. They regularly take part in fundraising activities which support the school and local charities. For example, pupils recently raised money for a school defibrillator. Pupil ambassadors promote equality and diversity across the school by ensuring the views of pupils are listened to.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Most pupils conduct themselves well. They show respect and courtesy towards their peers and the adults who work with them. The atmosphere around the school is relaxed and friendly. Pupils understand the behaviour systems. In most lessons they are able to concentrate on their work and do their best. However, pupils say that lessons are sometimes disrupted by a small minority of pupils, particularly when their regular teachers are absent.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The curriculum is ambitious and well designed. In most subjects, the curriculum sets out what pupils should learn and the order in which things are taught. Leaders have improved the key stage 3 curriculum to ensure pupils are better prepared for future study. In English, for instance, leaders have increased the range of texts that pupils study to ensure sufficient challenge. In most subjects, leaders have identified essential vocabulary and themes that pupils need to learn and remember. However, in a few subjects, such as science, this is not as strong, which means that some pupils do not achieve as well as they could. 8 and 9 February 2022

p.1

2

All pupils study the full national curriculum for three years in key stage 3. At key stage 4, the school provides a broad range of subjects, despite its relatively small size. Pupils have free choice of optional academic and vocational subjects. The numbers of pupils studying English Baccalaureate subjects in key stage 4 are similar to the national average. Additionally, very high numbers of pupils continue to study arts and technology subjects.

p.2

2

Staff are enthusiastic and have good subject knowledge. They work together to plan activities that build on what pupils have learned before. Staff are improving the way they check what pupils know and remember. In modern foreign languages, for example, teachers use assessment well to identify and address gaps in individual pupils’ learning.

p.2

2

Many pupils lack confidence in reading and in speaking in class. Leaders are determined to tackle this relative weakness, but work is at an early stage. Staff read to pupils regularly. However, many pupils do not read regularly or widely themselves. Some staff lack the skills to develop reading and spoken language in class. Specialist teaching for the weakest readers, however, ensures that these pupils develop increasingly secure reading skills.

p.2

2

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) benefit from effective support. The school caters particularly well for pupils with physical disabilities. These pupils are fully involved in school life and learn well.

p.2

2

The house system and tutoring makes a significant contribution to pupils’ personal development. The school’s well-planned personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) and citizenship programme includes a range of topics that pupils feel are relevant to them. Pupils appreciate and value PSHE and citizenship sessions. They say that staff take these lessons seriously and teach them in an interesting way.

p.2

2

The school is well led and managed. Staff value the support they receive and leaders’ concern for their workload and well-being. Leaders provide effective support to the early career teachers (ECTs). Governors know the school well and provide constructive support and challenge. Their knowledge of the school is enhanced by discussions with senior pupils.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.2

Safeguarding

There is a strong culture of safeguarding within the school. Staff know how to respond if they have any concerns. Systems to record and follow up concerns are robust. Designated safeguarding leads are experienced and very knowledgeable about the pupils and families that they work with. They work proactively with other staff in the school and with external agencies. 8 and 9 February 2022

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 A few subjects, including science, are at an earlier stage of curriculum development, particularly in key stage 3. In these subjects the curriculum is not sufficiently demanding and does not prepare pupils fully for study in key stage 4. Leaders should ensure that the curriculum in all subjects sets out clearly and precisely what pupils need to know and be able to do. This will help pupils do as well as they could.  Many pupils do not read widely enough, either within academic subjects or for pleasure. This sometimes limits the breadth of their vocabulary and the depth of their writing. Some staff lack the expertise needed to teach reading successfully. Leaders should ensure that staff have the subject knowledge needed to help pupils to improve their reading. Leaders should also make sure that pupils are encouraged to read more widely.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called a section 8 inspection of a good or outstanding school, because it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on a section 8 inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a section 5 inspection. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the section 8 inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the section 8 inspection as a section 5 inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second section 8 inspection since we judged the school to be good in June 2013.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school. 8 and 9 February 2022

p.3

4

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 8 and 9 February 2022

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10200491 Type of school Secondary comprehensive

p.5

form

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

form

Chair of governing body Stephen Colclough

p.5

form

Website http://www.frogmorecollege.co.uk

p.5

form

Date of previous inspection 18 January 2017, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 A very small number of pupils in Year 11 attend alternative provision at Rowhill School, which is run by Hampshire County Council.  The school has seven ECTs, who follow the Ambition Institute core induction programme.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher and senior leaders. Inspectors also met with a range of teaching and support staff.  Inspectors evaluated the quality of education by looking in detail at the teaching of English, science and modern foreign languages. Inspectors discussed curriculum design with leaders, carried out lesson visits, scrutinised pupils’ work and spoke to pupils and teachers from the lessons visited about the curriculum. In addition, the lead inspector met with leaders of mathematics, history, art and design technology to review curriculum planning and examples of pupils’ work. 8 and 9 February 2022

p.5

6

 Inspectors met with the special educational needs co-ordinator (SENCo) and listened to small groups of pupils reading with the SENCo and a member of learning support staff.  Inspectors evaluated the effectiveness of safeguarding. The school’s single central record was reviewed. Inspectors met with the designated safeguarding lead and discussed some case studies of safeguarding referrals.  The lead inspector met with representatives from the governing body and had a telephone conversation with a local authority officer.  The lead inspector had a telephone conversation with the leader of the alternative provision and a tutor.  Inspectors considered the views of members of staff who responded to Ofsted’s online staff survey, responses to the Ofsted Parent View survey, and free-text responses. Inspectors met with groups of pupils formally and informally to discuss their views of the school. Inspectors also took account of responses to Ofsted’s online pupil survey.

p.6

Inspection team

Mark Bagust, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Alan Johnson Ofsted Inspector 8 and 9 February 2022

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion