Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
SGS Berkeley Green UTC
Summary
Kathy Maddocks (lead), Gill Hickling, Ralph Brompton
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
16 Feb 2022
- Inspectors verified
Gill Hickling, Kathy Maddocks, Ralph Brompton
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
GL13 9FB
- Name on report verified
SGS Berkeley Green UTC
- URN verified
144761
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders need to ensure that pupils have a greater awareness of the full range of issues that are relevant to their progress into adulthood and to life in modern Britain. p.4
- Leaders need to be more explicit in their communication to parents and pupils about the critical concepts that pupils learn in each subject. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment4
“The headteacher has been inspirational in achieving this.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,057
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of SGS Berkeley Green UTC Gloucestershire Science and Technology Park, Berkeley, Gloucestershire GL13 9FB
p.1
Inspection dates: 15 and 16 February 2022
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Sixth-form provision Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 15 and 16 February 2022
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The school promotes science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) for 14- to 19-year-old learners in a very effective manner. Learners arrive on buses from over 40 different locations in Bristol, South Gloucestershire and Gloucestershire. Leaders have worked tirelessly to make sure that new entrants understand the uniqueness of the school and its curriculum. As a result, learners want to be at school and focus on their studies.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Staff treat learners as young adults. As a result, learners behave with maturity. Learners respond well to the ‘professional’ expectations of staff. There is a calm learning environment throughout the school. Learners are respectful to each other and staff. Bullying is rare and staff deal with it swiftly when it happens.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Staff have fostered strong relationships with employers and universities. During the inspection, local employers interviewed every Year 10 and Year 12 learner. This provides pupils with a realistic understanding of work in STEM-related occupations.
p.2
better?
Leaders from the multi-academy trust and the university technology college (UTC) have a clear ambition for the school. The headteacher has been inspirational in achieving this. Her vision for the school as a professional learning community has come to fruition.
p.2
better?
Leaders have an inclusive ethos. Although STEM subjects dominate the sixth-form curriculum, there is a broader choice in key stage 4. Leaders recognise that pupils may want to extend their opportunities for learning, post-16. The key stage 4 curriculum allows pupils to take the English Baccalaureate, even though this is not a requirement of a UTC.
p.2
better?
Teachers know their subjects well. Many have worked in relevant industries prior to taking up a teaching career. They share real-life work experiences that add to learners’ employability. Leaders plan curriculums so that learners continually build on past learning. Recalling previous learning is a key feature of lessons which helps learners to develop strong understanding. Consequently, learners use their knowledge to solve problems and move on to more complex learning successfully.
p.2
better?
Some of the younger pupils are less secure as to why they are learning topics at a particular time. Staff do not always explain effectively to them the structure of the curriculum. Some parents expressed that they, too, would like to know more about what pupils are learning, and when. 15 and 16 February 2022
p.2
3
Employers set workplace projects for learners. This enables learners to hone skills and knowledge that are pertinent to the subjects studied at a professional level. This helps every learner to secure an appropriate placement for their next steps.
p.3
3
Some pupils arrive in Year 10 with very low reading ages. They learn phonics if they cannot recognise words confidently. Others receive regular sessions to improve their fluency, so that they can learn alongside their peers successfully. However, leaders have not established a strong reading culture across the school. Leaders are keen to change this. Disadvantaged pupils and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities are doing as well as their peers. Staff understand the needs of these pupils, and adapt the way pupils learn when necessary.
p.3
3
Most pupils benefit from a comprehensive personal, social, health, citizenship and economic (PSHCE) education. Learners consider the moral and ethical aspects of the projects they complete. They produce work that is of a high standard. Pupils gain from detailed and regular guidance regarding careers and progression. They know about destinations such as higher education opportunities and how to achieve their career ambitions. As a result, pupils are enthusiastic about learning. Through the curriculum, pupils develop their character and confidence well, over time. They said that the school equips them effectively for the future. Many, particularly those studying sport, enjoy developing their physical health. In some areas, such as relationships and sex education, and fundamental British values, pupils have not remembered enough.
p.3
3
Staff use assessment very well to identify any gaps in pupils’ knowledge. Leaders have set up effective systems so that pupils catch up when they fall behind. The same processes are not in place for other aspects of the curriculum, such as PSHCE. Pupils have fallen behind in their learning of the wider aspects of school life as a direct result of lockdowns due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Leaders have not evaluated this effectively enough.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Safeguarding leaders know pupils well. They identify any vulnerable pupils in a timely way. This enables them to ensure that the right support is in place quickly. Leaders work well with the three local authorities’ multi-agency teams to secure specialist advice, make sure pupils are safe and receive the right help.
p.3
Safeguarding
Staff receive up-to-date training on safeguarding, and use the electronic system for sharing concerns effectively. 15 and 16 February 2022
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Leaders do not evaluate the curriculum for the personal development of pupils closely enough. This means that leaders do not know whether the curriculum is having the intended effect on pupils’ understanding. Leaders need to ensure that pupils have a greater awareness of the full range of issues that are relevant to their progress into adulthood and to life in modern Britain. Leaders have not shared the content of the curriculum well enough. Therefore, some parents and pupils are not as aware as they would like to be of what is being taught over time. Leaders need to be more explicit in their communication to parents and pupils about the critical concepts that pupils learn in each subject.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 15 and 16 February 2022
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10212172 Type of school Technical
p.5
School details
School category University technical college
p.5
sixth form
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.5
Information about this school
The school was opened in September 2017. The headteacher was appointed in September 2019. The school does not use alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors met with the headteacher, the deputy headteacher and other senior leaders, and had a telephone call with the school improvement partner. The lead 15 and 16 February 2022
p.5
6
inspector met with the deputy chief executive officer, the chair of trustees and the chair of the local school board. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: computer science, engineering, mathematics and science. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors checked the recruitment processes for new staff and spoke with safeguarding leaders. Inspectors spoke with teachers, staff and pupils to gauge their understanding of safeguarding. Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted’s survey Parent View, and staff questionnaires.
p.6
Inspection team
Kathy Maddocks, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Ralph Brompton Ofsted Inspector 15 and 16 February 2022
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion