Early years · Early years compliance action
Childminder in East Sussex
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
15 Mar 2022
- URN verified
EY550313
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 295
- about usual (typical 317)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 35
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 7 March 2022, we carried out an inspection and found the provider was not meeting some of these requirements. The overall effectiveness of the provision was judged to be inadequate. The inspection report sets out the actions the provider was required to take to meet the requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 15 March 2022, we carried out a regulatory visit. The focus of the visit was to check whether the provider had met the safeguarding and welfare actions, raised at their last inspection. We found the provider had met some of the safeguarding and welfare actions but not others. The provider ensured that she had required information about children, including permission to administer medication. She also understood the importance of recording hours of attendance and had shared her policies and procedures with her assistant. The provider had begun to address the weakness in safer recruitment practices; however, this was not complete. They had taken steps to source training to increase the assistant's knowledge of the wider aspects of safeguarding. However, this training had not been completed. We therefore served a further welfare requirements notice.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 23 March 2022, we carried out a telephone regulatory event. The focus of the call was to check whether the provider had met the safeguarding and welfare actions. We found the provider had provided child protection training for her assistant that included the wider aspects of safeguarding. She had also developed a clear system for safer recruitment of assistants. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion