Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)
Newton Flotman Pre-School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Newton Flotman Pre-School Committee
- Group reference verified
RP523649
- Inspection date verified
27 Jan 2022
- Inspectors verified
Terrie Simpson
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Outstanding
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
NR15 1PT
- Name on report verified
Newton Flotman Pre- School
- URN verified
254189
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationGood
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- There are significant weaknesses in safeguarding practice that compromise children's welfare. p.2
- Not all staff understand how to escalate safeguarding concerns if the designated safeguarding lead fails to act to protect a child. p.2
- The trustees and staff do not have a clear understanding of the actions they need to take should a child be at risk of harm. p.3
- This significantly compromises children's safety and risks leaving them at risk of potential harm. p.2
- Staff do not know that they should raise safeguarding concerns with the relevant bodies if they think that the trustees or safeguarding leads are not taking appropriate action to safeguard children. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,059
- about usual (typical 972)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Newton Flotman Pre- School Newton Flotman Village Centre, Newton Flotman, Norwich, Norfolk NR15 1PT
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Outstanding
p.1
The provision is inadequate
The children's safety and well-being are not prioritised. The trustees and their staff do not have a secure enough understanding of their responsibility to promote children's safety and well-being. However, teaching and learning is good, and staff are working well with children and parents.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Children arrive at the setting excited to see the staff and their friends and quickly settle to their self-chosen play. Staff implement gentle handovers for children whose parents cannot come into the playroom because of COVID-19 infection measures. Children who are new to the setting are supported by their parents to hang up their coats before being taken by staff to join in play. Children demonstrate that they feel safe as they interact with staff and happily invite them into their play.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Staff have high expectations of children's behaviour. They pay close attention to children's individual needs, including children with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Children behave very well. When they struggle to play alongside others, staff offer gentle support. They teach children to voice their frustrations and work together to reach an agreement.
p.2
need to do better?
n There are significant weaknesses in safeguarding practice that compromise children's welfare. For example, staff do not fully understand and implement the safeguarding policy. Not all staff understand how to escalate safeguarding concerns if the designated safeguarding lead fails to act to protect a child. This significantly compromises children's safety and risks leaving them at risk of potential harm. n The trustees do not have a clear oversight of the of the day-to-day running of the setting. They have failed to provide adequate support for the interim manager and staff. Consequently, they have not made sure that they have a full understanding of the weakness in safeguarding practice. This does not promote the well-being of either the staff or the children. n Arrangements for the supervision of staff are not in place. They do not receive targeted training and guidance to help them to fully understand and implement
p.2
need to do better?
the setting's safeguarding policies and procedures. As a result, trustees are unaware of the gaps in staff 's knowledge and understanding. In addition, trustees do not check the continued suitability of staff, or volunteers who cover for staff's absence, to work with children. n Arrangements for recording and storing information are not fully in place. Most notably, trustees and the interim manager have not developed a robust system for recording safeguarding concerns. They are not aware of local safeguarding
p.2
need to do better?
27 January 2022 partnership advice and guidance. They do not ensure that they comply with the Data Protection Act. Some records relating to complaints are not available for inspection. n Records of how additional funding for children is allocated are not kept. Consequently, the interim manager is unable to explain how it has been used to support children. Nevertheless, the interim manager and staff work closely with other professionals, parents and agencies to provide suitable support for children with SEND. They make accurate assessments of all children's level of development. They use these well to plan on what children know and and can do. n The interim manager and staff have worked hard during a period of turmoil to offer children good quality learning experiences. Children are confident and independent learners as they engage in the stimulating range of activities provided. Children learn to make friends and cooperate with their peers,
p.2
need to do better?
supported by attentive staff. n Children make up stories as they play that they are keen to share with staff and visitors. They draw pictures of their families and giggle as they make up fantastic tales. Staff are interested playmates and extend children's thoughts and ideas through skilful questioning and shared attention. Children learn to evaluate and review their work. n Children benefit from healthy snacks and robust hygiene procedures, such as taking regular drinks and frequent handwashing. They learn good habits that will support their health in later life. n Staff naturally weave mathematical concepts through their conversations with children. For instance, they support them to notice who they have drawn as the biggest and whether one person is in front of or behind another. Children learn the skills and language needed to begin supporting their understanding of mathematics. n Children, generally, develop good levels of speaking and listening. However,
p.3
need to do better?
staff do not understand how best to support those children who speak English as an additional language. Staff gather useful information, such as key words in children's home language. Although, they lack the knowledge and confidence, to explain to parents how their children's home language continues to play an important part in developing effective communication skills. This means that this group of children may not make the best possible progress in their speaking and listening.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
The trustees and staff do not have a clear understanding of the actions they need to take should a child be at risk of harm. Staff do not know that they should raise safeguarding concerns with the relevant bodies if they think that the trustees or safeguarding leads are not taking appropriate action to safeguard children. Induction that covers safeguarding is not in place for volunteers who work with children. Checks to ensure the continued suitability of staff and volunteers that
p.3
Safeguarding
27 January 2022 work with children are not in place. This does not protect children's welfare.
p.3
Due date
fully implement the setting's child protection policy and procedures to safeguard children 28/03/2022
p.4
Due date
provide staff and volunteers with safeguarding training to ensure that they have an up-to-date knowledge of safeguarding matters and understand how to identity and respond to child protection concerns 28/03/2022
p.4
Due date
implement robust systems to record all current and emerging child protection concerns in line with local safeguarding partnership guidance 28/03/2022
p.4
Due date
implement robust systems to check the continued suitability of staff and volunteers working with children 28/03/2022
p.4
Due date
implement effective supervision for the interim manager, staff and volunteers who work with children that fosters continuous improvement 28/03/2022
p.4
Due date
ensure that all records of complaints and outcomes are available for Ofsted to inspect 28/03/2022
p.4
Due date
ensure that suitable arrangements are in place to comply with the Data Protection Act. 28/03/2022
p.4
should:
n improve staff's knowledge and understanding of how to support children who are learning English as an additional language
p.4
should:
27 January 2022 n implement a robust system to record and evaluate how funding for children is spent and measure its impact on children's outcomes.
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number 254189 Local authority Norfolk Inspection number 10113223 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises
p.6
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Full day care
p.6
inspection
Total number of places 26 Number of children on roll 27 Name of registered person Newton Flotman Pre-School Committee
p.6
reference number
Telephone number 01508470680 Date of previous inspection 21 January 2016
p.6
Information about this early years setting
Newton Flotman Pre-School has been registered since 1977. It operates from the Village Centre in Newton Flotman, Norfolk. It opens Monday to Friday during term time only. Sessions are between 9am and 3.30pm Monday to Thursday and 9am to 1pm on Friday. Children can also stay all day. The pre-school receives funding for two-, three- and four-year old children. Four staff work with the children, all of whom hold relevant early years qualifications. The manager is qualified to level 3.
p.6
Inspection activities
n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n Children spoke to/communicated with the inspector during the inspection. n The inspector talked to staff at appropriate times during the inspection and took account of their views. n The inspector spoke with the chairperson of the governing body about the leadership and management of the setting. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided, indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning. n The manager and the inspector carried out a joint observation during snack time. n The inspector looked at relevant documentation and reviewed evidence of the suitability of staff working in the nursery. n The interim manager joined the inspector on a learning walk and talked to the
p.7
Inspection activities
inspector about their curriculum and what they want their children to learn.
p.7
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.7
Inspection activities
27 January 2022 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.8
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion