Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's home run by Nottingham City Council in Nottingham
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Nottingham City Council
- Inspection date verified
8 Feb 2022
- Inspectors verified
Andi Lilley-Tams
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Name on report verified
SC424280
- URN verified
SC424280
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementRI to be good
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This specifically relates to the need for the manager to ensure that staff supervisions and appraisals take place regularly and are recorded with sufficient detail. p.6
- Safer recruitment practices require strengthening. p.6
- The manager should oversee and evaluate the progress that children make in the home. p.6
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance3
“Management review and evaluation of children’s progress are not yet fully effective.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 1,180
- about usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children's home: SC424280 1 SC424280 Registered provider: Nottingham City Council Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
A local authority owns and operates this home. It is registered to provide care for up to two children who may have emotional, social and behavioural difficulties.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The home is led by an experienced and registered manager.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
Due to COVID-19, at the request of the Secretary of state, we suspended all routine inspections of social care providers carried out under the social care common inspection framework (SCCIF) on 17 March 2020. We returned to routine SCCIF inspections on 12 April 2021.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good
p.1
good
The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Date of last inspection: 16 October 2019
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: good
p.1
good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for children's home: SC424280 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
16/10/2019 Full Good 12/06/2018 Full Good 19/09/2017 Full Good 01/02/2017 Interim Sustained effectiveness Inspection report for children's home: SC424280 3
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children enjoy living at this home. They speak positively about the staff. The staff identify children’s strengths and support them to undertake hobbies and interests. For example, staff supported children to attend a RideWise course to improve their bicycle safety skills. Staff are good at using humour to make children feel at ease and to defuse difficult situations.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children are supported to maintain their bedrooms to a good standard. Staff support children to express themselves through how their bedrooms are decorated. For example, one child has a graffiti theme. Where children struggle to keep their bedrooms tidy, staff will incentivise and tidy the room with them. This helps children to develop a sense of pride for their rooms and their belongings, and it develops their independent living skills.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children are doing well with their education. There is good communication between the staff and education professionals. The manager has been proactive in advocating for one child to have extra learning support. This has included a specific learning assessment. As a result, the child passed their exams and was offered a place at college. The manager, staff and senior managers celebrate children’s achievements. This helps children to become confident and feel proud of themselves.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children are making progress. The children have regular discussions with staff about what matters most to them. Management review and evaluation of children’s progress are not yet fully effective. For example, areas in which individual children may need more support are not fully explored.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Children’s relevant documents are sufficiently detailed, and staff understand children’s backgrounds and histories. However, when children’s risk assessments are updated, the staff are not consistently reading the amended document. This prevents staff having an up-to-date understanding of children’s risks and vulnerabilities.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The manager took decisive action following concerns that a child was in an unhealthy relationship. The manager was proactive. He quickly raised concerns about the relationship with the relevant, involved professional agencies. Professionals were then able to devise a safety plan to protect the child. The child was supported to complete individual work focused on what constitutes a healthy relationship. This approach was well organised and coordinated, and it kept the child safe. Inspection report for children's home: SC424280 4 Children know the house rules and are supported to use electronic devices in a safe manner. If children do not stick to these rules, staff will implement behavioural sanctions. This ensures that children remain safe and adhere to the boundaries put in place by staff. Staff record the use of sanctions clearly, including the reasons for the sanction and the response by the child.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The manager and staff did not record a significant incident when one child hurt another. Additionally, children are not always spoken to following concerning incidents. This prevents children giving their views about incidents they are involved in. Managers and senior staff do ensure that staff receive a debrief following incidents. However, these debriefs are not always signed by those involved. A child’s room was searched by staff, and the manager did not evaluate the reason for the search or how it was undertaken.
p.4
good
Children like the manager and they are confident to talk to him if they have any concerns or worries. However, there have been two occasions where different children have raised a concern about the care practice of staff. The manager has not formally addressed this matter with the staff involved. Consequently, children may feel that they have not been listened to.
p.4
good
Staff are enthusiastic about their roles. They are committed to the children. Staff training is of a good standard. However, records of staff supervision are not yet kept or maintained to an acceptable standard. For example, there are significant gaps in supervision records. There is also a pattern of supervision sessions not taking place within timescales. The developmental appraisals of staff are not dated or signed, and they present as incomplete.
p.4
good
The manager provides additional training materials to staff to support their development. However, this is not followed up in supervision with staff to see if they have accessed the material or how this has helped to develop their practice. Similarly, where the manager has asked staff to use learning resources with the children, the manager has not then followed this up and checked if this has happened.
p.4
good
Staff have raised some concerns with the manager relating to staff practice on two occasions. The manager has not implemented plans to manage and resolve these concerns. When the manager recruits new staff to the home, the safer recruitment checks need strengthening to ensure children are safeguarded.
p.4
good
The manager ensures that children experience meaningful, organised transitions when they join and leave the home. For example, staff wrote to one child describing everything that ‘they loved about him’. This child stays in touch and visits the home for his Christmas lunch. Inspection report for children's home: SC424280 5 The manager has taken action to meet the statutory requirement and recommendations from the last inspection. The manager promptly implemented an action plan and met these in full. Inspection report for children's home: SC424280 6
p.4
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.6
Requirement Due date
The leadership and management standard is that the registered person enables, inspires and leads a culture in relation to the children’s home that—
p.6
Requirement Due date
helps children aspire to fulfil their potential; and
p.6
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to—
p.6
Requirement Due date
ensure that staff work as a team where appropriate;
p.6
Requirement Due date
ensure that staff have the experience, qualifications and skills to meet the needs of each child;
p.6
Requirement Due date
understand the impact that the quality of care provided in the home is having on the progress and experiences of each child and use this understanding to inform the development of the quality of care provided in the home; and
p.6
Requirement Due date
use monitoring and review systems to make continuous improvements in the quality of care provided in the home.
p.6
Requirement Due date
(Regulation 13 (1)(a)(b) (2)(b)(c)(f)(h))
p.6
Requirement Due date
This specifically relates to the need for the manager to ensure that staff supervisions and appraisals take place regularly and are recorded with sufficient detail. Safer recruitment practices require strengthening. The manager should oversee and evaluate the progress that children make in the home. Incidents and complaints should be recorded effectively and evaluated by the manager, and appropriate action taken. 01 April 2022 Inspection report for children's home: SC424280 7
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children's home: SC424280 8
p.7
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Nottingham City Council
p.8
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: Nottingham City Council, Loxley House, Station Street, Nottingham, NG2 3NG
p.8
Inspector
Andi Lilley-Tams, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children's home: SC424280 9 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.9
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.9
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion