Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
20 Jan 2022
- Inspectorssingle source
Adam Vincent
- Postcode verified
RM9 5LT
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 944
- about usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Scott Halliwell Headteacher Southwood Primary School Keppel Road Dagenham Essex RM9 5LT
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 20 January 2022, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received a judgement of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. I discussed the ongoing impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.
p.1
School
Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action in
order for the school to become a good school.
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action in
The school should take further action to:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action in
ensure that leaders identify the key knowledge that they want pupils to learn in subjects such as geography and history put in place strategies to check what pupils know and remember further develop approaches to support pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) so that all pupils can access the full curriculum.
p.1
Context
Since the previous inspection, the staff team has remained stable. New subject leaders have been appointed, and an existing member of staff has taken up the role of special educational needs coordinator.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders’ work to secure improvements is having a positive impact. Expectations for all pupils, including those with SEND, have been raised. You and your team have also taken effective steps to develop staff’s expertise in teaching the curriculum. Training for staff, including in phonics, means that staff are better able to support pupils’ learning.
p.2
Main findings
You have also developed and strengthened the leadership team. All leaders understand their roles and responsibilities in securing improvements. Some of your team are new to these leadership roles. You are supporting these staff well, and making sure that they have the expertise to develop and train other staff.
p.2
Main findings
Since the previous inspection, you and your leadership team have reviewed the curriculum for each subject. Typically, subject leaders are now clearer about the essential knowledge that pupils will need to succeed and learn well. This work is not as developed in geography and history as it is in other subjects. Nevertheless, leaders are at the early stages of setting out what they expect pupils to know and remember in history and geography.
p.2
Main findings
Plans for English and mathematics are clear, with careful thought given to helping pupils to increase their knowledge progressively. Leaders know where gaps in pupils’ understanding and knowledge are. In some subjects, however, assessment approaches do not enable pupils to fully demonstrate what they have learned and how this has developed over time.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders have further developed a structured and well-planned curriculum for reading. This has raised the profile of reading in the school. Pupils enjoyed talking to me about their favourite books and authors. They said that they enjoy reading. Leaders are also taking effective steps to develop other aspects of the English curriculum, including writing. The changes you have made mean that pupils are building up and applying their understanding of grammar, as well as different styles of writing.
p.2
Main findings
The physical education curriculum has been reviewed and adapted following the COVID- 19 restrictions. Pupils like the renewed opportunities they have to take part in competitions. The new leadership team is also generating a renewed enthusiasm for teaching the well-planned curriculum for phonics and mathematics. Training for staff has increased their confidence, for instance in selecting resources which help pupils to learn and remember essential knowledge. Pupils’ learning in phonics and mathematics is assessed carefully. Pupils who fall behind are supported through regular, additional help. Similarly, pupils with SEND receive a range of support. There are times, however, that this support means pupils miss out on learning alongside their peers in the classroom. Leaders are currently reviewing how they organise and provide additional support. They understand the importance of all pupils having access to the same curriculum.
p.2
Additional support
Leaders have benefited from a range of support and guidance from the local authority. For example, local authority advisers have helped leaders to obtain an accurate picture of the school’s strengths and weaknesses, and identify the right priorities for improvement. You and your team continue to work closely with the local authority to refine improvement plans and evaluate the impact of your actions. Leaders have also drawn on expertise and experience from within a local network of schools to inform their decisions on how to develop the curriculum. Governors make effective use of the information from the local authority to help check on the progress of leaders.
p.3
Evidence
During the inspection, I met with you, other senior leaders, pupils, staff, representatives of those responsible for governance and a representative of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.
p.3
Evidence
I also looked at evidence on how the curriculum has been developed and how it is being taught. I visited lessons, including in mathematics and reading, and looked at a range of pupils’ work. I considered 33 responses to the online questionnaire, Ofsted Parent View, and spoke with parents and carers before school.
p.3
Evidence
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Barking and Dagenham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion