Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Etchingham Church of England Primary School

Inspected 25 Jan 2022 · published 15 Mar 2022 · URN 114502

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jo Lakey (lead), Alice Roberts

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    25 Jan 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Alice Roberts, Jo Lakey

  • Postcode verified

    TN19 7BY

  • Name on report verified

    Etchingham Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    114502

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+14Mostly positivemore positive than 13% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivepositivelyeffectivelyenjoyoutstandingstronghappyconfident
Criticismconcernsat risknot effectiveseriousfalling behindinconsistentweakerlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1417w+12
  • Safeguarding104w+27

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,514
longer than usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 55
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 72%Safeguarding 5%About the inspection 22%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Etchingham Church of England Primary School Parsonage Croft, High Street, Etchingham, East Sussex TN19 7BY

p.1

Outcome

There has been no change to this school’s overall judgement of good as a result of this initial (section 8) inspection. However, the evidence gathered suggests that the inspection grade might not be as high if a full inspection were carried out now. The next inspection will therefore be a full (section 5) inspection.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are happy and confident learners in this bright and welcoming school. They speak very positively about their school and are proud to be a part of it. Staff develop warm and caring relationships with pupils. These relationships are supported by the school’s strong Christian ethos.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Staff want pupils to do well. Teachers select topics to motivate and enthuse pupils. Their experiences are enriched with trips and extra-curricular activities. Older pupils spoke positively about the residential school journey, which helped everyone to get along well.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils like talking about the books they read and study in class. They can see that they are getting better at reading and mathematics and know that staff expect them to work hard. They like the ways that staff help them to concentrate in lessons and feel that most pupils behave well in and out of lessons thanks to this support.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Most of the time, pupils play calmly together during social times and pupils know that unkindness towards each other is not tolerated. There are very few incidents of bullying. If bullying does happen, then it is dealt with quickly and effectively.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Although pupils like school, their experiences in some subjects are varied. This is because leaders have not made sure that learning is always structured around the knowledge that pupils have learned and what they need to learn next. This hinders pupils’ progress across the curriculum.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Leaders have not ensured that the curriculum provided to pupils helps them to learn more and remember more over time in all subjects. Leaders identified the need to improve the 25 January 2022

p.1

2

curriculum prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and prioritised writing, mathematics and science. They are beginning to share leadership responsibilities more widely to gain a deeper and more precise understanding of the quality of education in other subjects. The areas leaders have addressed, such as science and mathematics, are stronger. Here, leaders have a clearer understanding about how to build up pupils’ knowledge. They have carefully supported staff to understand how to check what pupils have remembered and to focus on what pupils need to learn next. In these subjects, pupils’ work indicates that they are learning what leaders intended. As a result, pupils are set up well for their next steps.

p.2

2

Leaders have a clear understanding of the importance of early reading. The teaching of reading is effective. From Reception Year, children immediately start to learn phonics. Regular practice helps them to commit the sounds to memory. They practise handwriting alongside their phonics. Children are excited to learn new sounds and are keen to show how well they can read. The books pupils read are well matched to their reading ability. Where pupils are at risk of falling behind, support is in place to help them catch up quickly. A sense of excitement about books runs through the school and Year 6 pupils enjoy sharing ideas about books. The class novels are well selected and are often linked to learning in other subjects, such as geography.

p.2

2

However, learning in other subjects is not planned as effectively. This is because leaders have only recently begun to identify what knowledge pupils need. They have been distracted by creating exciting ‘hooks’ and fun activities that pupils enjoy but get little from in the long term. As a result, pupils’ progress in learning and remembering more is hindered.

p.2

2

Some subject leaders are new in post. During the pandemic, they received training for their role but they have only recently begun to check how well the new curriculum plans are taught. Similarly, during the pandemic, governors made only limited checks on the quality of education in the school. Consequently, the pace of improvement in some subjects in the curriculum has not been as quick as it could have been. Governors recognise that they have not challenged leaders enough.

p.2

2

Adaptations for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are inconsistent. Pupils are fully included in lessons and teachers revise activities for them. Where the curriculum is designed well, the changes made are thoughtful and effective. Where it is not, these pupils struggle.

p.2

2

Beyond the academic curriculum, there is more strength. Leaders are determined to provide a wide experience for all pupils, especially those who are disadvantaged. Pupils are supported to develop their interest in the world around them and to consider other people’s views. They participate with enthusiasm and make sure others do too.

p.2

2

Staff appreciate the support provided through recent training, including opportunities to develop their leadership skills. The school is part of the Riverside Federation. This benefits staff by providing them with opportunities to share expertise with staff from another school. Most staff report that leaders have considered their workload. However, some staff feel they would benefit from additional time to fulfil their roles and responsibilities. 25 January 2022

p.2

3

In discussion with the headteacher, the inspectors agreed that leadership development of staff, planning for the structured progression of knowledge from the time children join the school in early years, and adaptations to the wider curriculum for pupils with SEND may usefully serve as a focus for the next inspection.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

All staff are alert for any signs of worry and report any concerns clearly and quickly. Leaders responsible for safeguarding take swift and appropriate action, securing help that pupils and their families might require.

p.3

Safeguarding

Staff receive regular updates and training on areas of safeguarding that they need to be aware of, including how to spot inappropriate behaviour.

p.3

Safeguarding

Pupils have a secure knowledge of how to keep themselves safe, including when online. The school’s e-safety education has helped pupils to build their knowledge of whom to tell and what to do if they are concerned about something while online.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Curriculum thinking does not fully identify what knowledge pupils are intended to learn and remember over time in every subject. Consequently, teachers plan interesting activities for pupils to do rather than what they need to learn. Each subject needs to be coherently planned and sequenced so that teachers know what knowledge they are aiming to build over time.  Some new curriculum leaders have not checked how well the new curriculum is taught. Leaders need to check that all subject areas are taught effectively so that pupils learn well over time across the curriculum.  Sometimes staff working with pupils with SEND do not know how to break down the skills and knowledge into smaller parts, which does not help pupils to learn. Plans to support pupils with SEND are closely aligned with each curriculum area. Where the curriculum is weaker, adaptations for these pupils are not effective. These pupils need

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

to be considered as curriculum plans are strengthened.  While governors are aware that the curriculum for the foundation subjects is being developed, they have not yet checked the impact of this work. Governors need to monitor more closely the curriculum development in all the foundation subjects to ensure that they know what difference leaders’ actions are having on the quality of education. 25 January 2022

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called a section 8 inspection of a good or outstanding school, because it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on a section 8 inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a section 5 inspection. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the section 8 inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the section 8 inspection as a section 5 inspection immediately.

p.4

Background

This is the second section 8 inspection since we judged the school to be good in March 2012.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 25 January 2022

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Executive headteacher Matthew Montebello

p.5

School details

Website etchingham.greenschoolsonline.co.uk/

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 25 January 2017, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The executive headteacher joined the school in September 2020.  The school is part of the Riverside Federation with Bodiam Church of England Primary School. The two schools share one governing body.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met the executive headteacher, the head of school and the special educational needs coordinator. A meeting was held with the chair of the governing body and other governors. In addition, a telephone conversation took place with a local authority representative and a representative of the Diocese of Chichester.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics and geography. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. 25 January 2022

p.5

6

 Account was taken of 34 responses to Ofsted’s Parent View questionnaire, four responses to the staff survey and 20 responses to the pupil survey.  Inspectors also looked at curriculum plans and spoke to leaders about some other subjects.

p.6

Inspection team

Jo Lakey, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Alice Roberts Her Majesty’s Inspector 25 January 2022

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion