Summary
Daniel Short (lead), Isabel Davis, Katherine Douglas
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
19 Jan 2022
- Inspectors verified
Daniel Short, Isabel Davis, Katherine Douglas
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
MK42 6BA
- Name on report verified
Wixams Tree Primary School
- URN verified
143926
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders check that training ensures staff have the knowledge to identify pupils at risk of harm. p.3
- Staff know how to report concerns and leaders check these concerns are followed through with external services in a timely manner. p.3
- The shortcomings in curriculum design for early reading are not evident in other areas of the curriculum. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment10
“Teachers feel comfortable to approach leaders with questions or concerns.” p.3Progress & outcomes3
“Pupils behave well and work hard to achieve the ‘rainbow rewards’.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,295
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Wixams Tree Primary School Green Lane, Wixams, Bedford, Bedfordshire MK42 6BA
p.1
Inspection dates: 18 and 19 January 2022
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 18 and 19 January 2022
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils and staff embody Wixams Tree Primary School’s motto ‘be kind, be kind, be kind’. Pupils behave well and work hard to achieve the ‘rainbow rewards’. They take pride in receiving the special certificates.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils like the extra-curricular opportunities on offer, including school trips, workshops and clubs. Pupils were particularly excited about an upcoming art workshop and the plans to paint a mural outside to showcase their creativity.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Because the school is expanding, new pupils join frequently. These pupils receive a warm welcome, saying they feel happy in their new school. Pupils say they rarely have concerns about bullying, but they know how to report them if they do. This helps pupils to feel listened to and safe in school.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils know staff aim to help them achieve their best. Pupils learn lots of interesting topics, complemented by storybooks their teachers read to them. However, there are flaws in the early reading curriculum that hinder some pupils’ ability to read independently. Pupils need staff to address these flaws quickly, otherwise they could hold back some pupils’ learning in the wider curriculum.
p.2
better?
Pupils enjoy being read to and like reading. However, pupils at an early stage of reading are not learning to read well. Some of these pupils may know the sounds letters make, but they cannot read these confidently in words in the books they receive. Leaders rely on teachers to organise additional support for pupils not keeping up with the pace of the phonics programme. Some teachers and teaching assistants do not have the knowledge to do this well. Therefore, the extra support some pupils receive is not helping them. Leaders have not monitored the quality or impact of this support, so have not started to put this right.
p.2
better?
The shortcomings in curriculum design for early reading are not evident in other areas of the curriculum. Leaders have carefully considered what content they want teachers to teach pupils. Leaders have devised appropriate assessment systems. Teachers use the school’s ‘flashback 4’ approach to revisit and reinforce pupils’ previous learning. This helps pupils to see progress in their learning. It also helps teachers identify if changes need to be made to what content is taught, and when.
p.2
better?
Because staff are keen and kind, children in the early years settle quickly. Many children listen attentively to adults. Children take care of the books and equipment in their classroom. Some activities are closely matched to children’s needs, particularly in Reception. These inspire and challenge children to do well. However, the activities children complete in the Nursery are often focused on the activities children will undertake, rather than on what they should learn. Provision for pupils is not as effective in the Nursery as it is in Reception. 18 and 19 January 2022
p.2
3
The quality of support for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) varies. Where leaders work closely with staff, parents and external agencies to identify pupils’ needs and arrange timely support, pupils do well. However, many pupils with SEND require help with reading and staff do not have the knowledge to identify the barriers which impede these pupils’ ability to read. Again, leaders’ monitoring and support of this aspect of SEND provision has not addressed this.
p.3
3
Leaders have thought carefully about how they want to prepare pupils for life in modern Britain. For example, through the music curriculum, pupils learn about other cultures while learning to play different instruments, such as the steel pan or the ukulele. In personal, social and health education, pupils watch a video before they discuss and debate the right thing to do. These videos introduce pupils to topics, such as ‘stranger danger’, in a sensitive way. Pupils learn to listen to one another and reach a mature understanding.
p.3
3
Leaders’ approach to monitoring attendance ensures pupils’ attendance is high in the context of the pandemic. There is a clear system that challenges and supports parents. It helps to quickly address issues with a pupil’s attendance or punctuality.
p.3
3
Staff and parents report positively on their relationships with leaders. Teachers feel comfortable to approach leaders with questions or concerns. Early career teachers (ECTs) receive helpful guidance from their mentors which helps them improve their teaching. Many parents who responded to the online survey, Ofsted Parent View, say leaders and their staff are friendly and helpful.
p.3
3
Those responsible for governance do not challenge or check school leaders’ work as well as they should. For example, members of the local advisory body raised concerns about the early reading curriculum, but did not push school leaders to address these quickly. Directors in the trust do not speak knowingly about their systems for checking that the curriculum on offer to pupils is the best it can be.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders check that training ensures staff have the knowledge to identify pupils at risk of harm. Staff know how to report concerns and leaders check these concerns are followed through with external services in a timely manner. This helps vulnerable pupils and their families receive the support they need.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders’ simple motto ‘be kind, be kind, be kind’ and its partner phrase, ‘tell, tell, tell’, create an environment where pupils feel able to voice their concerns.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders work with the trust’s human resources department to manage the statutory checks on staff and visitors. There were some minor administrative matters which leaders remedied during inspection, due to miscommunication between the trust and the school. 18 and 19 January 2022
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Some staff lack the knowledge and training to identify the barriers that impede some pupils’ ability to read. Staff provide some pupils with books containing words they cannot read. As a result, some pupils do not learn to read well enough. Leaders must put in place an ambitious early reading curriculum and provide staff with the training and resources they need to teach all pupils to read fluently. Not all staff in the early years have the knowledge and experience to organise ambitious activities for children. Some children complete activities that are not well matched to their needs. Leaders must ensure all staff receive training to help them organise and teach a curriculum that is well matched to children’s needs. Leaders do not monitor the quality of education astutely. They do not quickly identify those teachers or teaching assistants who need training and guidance to best support all pupils. Leaders must ensure there is focused, timely monitoring
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
that informs curriculum development and staff training to ensure a high-quality education for all pupils. Those responsible for governance lack knowledge about the quality of education in the school. They do not use development plans well to ensure prompt improvements. Governors must ensure school leaders’ development plans are formed in a way that allows governors to hold school leaders to account for school improvement.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 18 and 19 January 2022
p.4
School details
Date of previous inspection 12 November 2020, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
Wixams Tree Primary School opened in September 2017. The school is expanding to a larger-than-average primary school, providing education for three- to 11- year-olds. The school is part of the Bedford College Academies Trust.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, science, history and music. For each deep dive, inspectors met with leaders, looked at curriculum plans, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their 18 and 19 January 2022
p.5
6
learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The lead inspector and a team inspector also listened to a sample of pupils read to a familiar adult. Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, the deputy headteacher, who is also the designated safeguarding lead and the SEND coordinator, two assistant headteachers and the mentors to the ECTs. The lead inspector held meetings with those responsible for governance, including four directors and two members of the local advisory body. The lead inspector reviewed a range of school documentation and policies, including records of meetings and reports from external advisers. To inspect safeguarding, the lead inspector spoke to the designated safeguarding lead and a deputy designated safeguarding lead. The lead inspector met with four directors and also met with the headteacher and office manager to scrutinise the single central record of recruitment and vetting checks. Inspectors also spoke
p.6
6
with teachers, support staff and pupils. Inspectors spent time observing and speaking to pupils, including the school council. Inspectors also considered the 200 responses to Ofsted’s pupil survey. Inspectors gathered parents’ views by reviewing the 101 responses and 73 free- text comments submitted to the online survey, Ofsted Parent View. Inspectors gathered staff members’ views by speaking to several of them. Inspectors took account of the 22 responses to Ofsted’s staff survey.
p.6
Inspection team
Daniel Short, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Katherine Douglas Her Majesty’s Inspector 18 and 19 January 2022
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion