Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 20 Jan 2022 · published 18 Feb 2022

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mark Howes

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    20 Jan 2022

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mark Howes

  • Postcode verified

    B45 9EL

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+25Mostly positivemore positive than 63% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositiveeffectiveaccuratewell sequencedstrongconsistenteffectivelyconsistently
Criticismnot consistentlyrequires improvementdisruptionnot alwaysdeclineerrorsdo not know

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1007w+24
  • Leadership174w+23

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,172
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 2
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%Leadership 15%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Damian Belshaw Principal Waseley Hills High School School Road Rubery Birmingham West Midlands B45 9EL

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 20 January 2022, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received a requires improvement judgement at its previous section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. I discussed the ongoing impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action in

order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action in

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action in

 ensure the consistent implementation of the school’s new curriculum across all subjects  ensure that teachers are provided with accurate information and strategies to help support pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) effectively  improve behaviour by ensuring that all staff apply the school’s behaviour policy consistently.

p.1

Context

Since the previous inspection, the school has undergone several significant changes. The school joined the Central Region Schools Trust in November 2021. Prior to this, the trust had worked closely with the school to provide support and undertake various external reviews.

p.2

Context

You were appointed as principal in January 2022. An executive principal from another local school in the trust is overseeing you in your new role. A new assistant principal has been seconded to the school by the trust, and took up post in January 2022.

p.2

Context

Although the COVID-19 pandemic has caused some disruption, the trust has found ways to ensure that work to improve the school continues.

p.2

Main findings

Following the previous inspection, the school went into a period of decline. This had a particularly detrimental impact on the quality of education and pupils’ behaviour and attitudes to learning. You recognise this. Trust leaders have a clear and candid view of what the school needs to do to improve. In a short space of time, you have worked together with leaders from across the trust to take action. This is already starting to show some success.

p.2

Main findings

New leaders quickly identified the need to improve the curriculum. Leaders have moved the school back to a three-year key stage 3 curriculum. This is providing more time to help deepen and secure pupils’ knowledge and understanding across different subjects. Trust leaders have carried out reviews in all core subjects. These reviews have identified specific aspects of the curriculum that need to improve. Subject leaders are benefiting from the support of the trust in co-designing the new curriculum. Staff are positive about the impact the trust is having.

p.2

Main findings

Subject leaders are working closely in subject networks across the trust to look at strengthening the curriculum. New curriculum guidance is well sequenced. It is clear how intended learning builds over time so that pupils become secure in what they know. Further work has also taken place to strengthen the school’s approach to assessment. Leaders have identified opportunities to check work with other schools in the trust, to ensure that pupils receive more consistent and accurate feedback. However, leaders recognise that there is further work to do. Changes to curriculum guidance are still very new and, currently, are not being implemented consistently across different subjects. You have rightly prioritised the need to ensure greater consistency in the way that teachers check pupils’ understanding. You have introduced ‘do now’ activities at the start of lessons, when teachers recap prior learning so that pupils remember it. You have also

p.2

Main findings

introduced checks at the end of lessons. These are intended to help teachers identify what pupils know, and where errors and misconceptions might persist. Staff are positive about the impact of these changes.

p.3

Main findings

As recommended at the previous inspection, leaders have reviewed the effectiveness of their pupil premium spending. Leaders have used evidence from research and have collaborated across the trust to help identify barriers to learning. You have also put a strategy plan in place to support disadvantaged pupils. Leaders are now regularly checking how this money is spent. They have ensured that teachers have a better understanding of the most effective ways to support disadvantaged pupils in the classroom.

p.3

Main findings

You recognise that there is still more work to do in order to improve other aspects of the school’s work. The provision for pupils with SEND needs to be better. Teachers are not always given the most accurate information about these pupils’ needs. Furthermore, teachers do not know enough about how to support pupils with SEND, so that they make the best possible progress. The trust’s recent review of the provision for pupils with SEND recognises this. You have plans in place to improve these aspects.

p.3

Main findings

You also recognise that pupils’ behaviour and attitudes to learning need to be more positive. Pupils do not behave consistently well in lessons, and some teachers do not challenge the use of derogatory language. This can mean that some pupils’ experiences of school are negative. You are taking steps to address this.

p.3

Main findings

Trustees and governors have a strong understanding of the school’s current position. The trust is committed to ensuring that the school improves and is fully supportive of the work that has already taken place. A new local academy governing board is providing more effective support and challenge for leaders. Governors are given regular updates on the work that is taking place, and are keen to help drive further improvements.

p.3

Additional support

The trust has provided extensive support for the school, through its trust improvement team and a number of external consultants. A school improvement partner has carried out a recent review of pupils’ behaviour. In addition, a school improvement consultant has undertaken reviews of all core subjects. These consultants have also provided training for subject leaders. The trust has also used the support of a specialist leader in education, who is working in the school once a week to provide support in English. Prior to joining the trust, the school arranged a safeguarding review.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I met with you, the principal. I also met with other senior leaders, the multi-academy trust chief executive officer, pupils, staff, and representatives of those responsible for governance, to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.4

Evidence

I also held meetings with subject leaders to discuss curriculum plans. I looked at information on the school’s website and scrutinised documents relating to school improvement work.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, and the chief executive officer of the Central Region Schools Trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Worcestershire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion