Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected 20 Jan 2022 · published 16 Feb 2022

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Steve Wren

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    20 Jan 2022

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Steve Wren

  • Postcode verified

    NE63 9FZ

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+17Mostly positivemore positive than 50% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehighly effectiveeffectiveconsistentlyimprovingsuccessfullyclearstrengthsclearly
Criticismseriousweaknessespoorabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings136w0
  • What needs to improve1335w+17

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,471
about usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 9%What needs to improve 89%About the inspection 2%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Ruston Atkinson Principal NCEA Duke’s Secondary School Academy Road Ashington Northumberland NE63 9FZ

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 20 January 2022, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses in March 2020. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

This was the first routine inspection the school had received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. I discussed the ongoing impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

towards the removal of the serious weaknesses designation.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

The trust’s statement of action is fit for purpose. I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, the chief executive officer of Northumberland Church of England Academy Trust, the director of education for the Diocese of Newcastle, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Northumberland. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.1

Context

At the time of the last section 5 inspection, you were serving as acting principal. You have since been appointed to the role permanently. Since the previous inspection, you have appointed three new senior leaders, including a new deputy headteacher. There have been relatively few changes in the staffing of other positions within the school.

p.3

Context

Since the time of the previous inspection, you have developed new provision, ‘The Beacon’, for those pupils who need additional support. Staff in this provision started working with pupils in September 2021.

p.3

Context

The pandemic has caused some priorities to be adjusted. For example, curriculum development initially focused on remote provision as the majority of pupils were accessing their education at home. Notwithstanding these necessary adjustments, you have been able to undertake development work in the key areas identified at the time of the previous inspection.

p.3

Context

In this monitoring visit, I focused on exploring the steps you have taken to improve: the quality of the curriculum and its implementation, ensuring it meets the learning needs of pupils; pupils’ attendance, especially of pupils who are disadvantaged or have additional needs; and pupils’ behaviour in and out of lessons.

p.3

designation

Leaders have taken significant strides towards the removal of the serious weaknesses designation. They have focused on addressing the root causes of problems rather than looking for quick fixes that will not have lasting impact. This focus, coupled with effective communication and careful consideration of staff workload, have ensured that staff in school understand the changes being made and are fully committed to delivering them. You have successfully changed perceptions of what pupils at NCEA Duke’s can achieve.

p.3

designation

You have restructured the leadership team. Getting the right people in the right places, and giving each clear accountability for improving the areas of the school for which they are responsible has been fundamental. You expect them to research what is effective within other schools and to use this thinking to help develop approaches that will work in your school. You provide challenge and support for those responsible for improving areas of the school through regular scheduled meetings.

p.3

designation

Leaders have developed a culture in which school improvement is everyone’s responsibility. You speak about ‘leaders at all levels’ taking responsibility for improving the school. The ‘see, share, solve’ approach encourages all members of staff to come forward if they identify an aspect of the school that they feel could be enhanced. Following the previous inspection, trustees formed an academy improvement board (AIB) to provide specific additional expertise. The AIB consists of the principal, some trustees, a representative of the local authority, the chief operating officer (CEO) of the trust, the director of education of the diocese and some associate members. The AIB offers appropriate challenge and support to the school. It has set up highly effective systems to ensure that it fully understands the current strengths and the next steps to be taken in the development of the school. The AIB makes a highly effective contribution to the

p.3

designation

progress of the school in coming out of serious weaknesses.

p.4

designation

Since the previous inspection, you have prioritised development of the curriculum. External support and training have been provided for your faculty leaders to develop their knowledge and understanding of what makes an effective curriculum. Faculty leaders, working with their teams, have developed curriculums that clearly identify key learning aims for each year. It is now clear what pupils need to know, and when. As a result of your close work with colleagues in primary schools, these curriculums build coherently and consistently on what pupils have learned previously. You have used external support to assure yourself of the quality of the new curriculum.

p.4

designation

Your ‘DNA’ model for good practice in teaching and learning has been reviewed and relaunched. It clearly identifies strategies that you want teachers to use within the classroom. You have ensured that teachers are provided with opportunities to work with others to develop their use of the agreed strategies.

p.4

designation

Pupils speak very positively about the changes in the quality of education they are receiving. They uniformly say that it is stronger than when the school was last inspected. However, they identify that there are still some areas for improvement, for example in teachers breaking complex explanations down into more manageable pieces.

p.4

designation

Assessment is at an earlier stage of development. Leaders have identified that more effective assessment will establish the effectiveness of their curriculum in supporting pupils to know, remember and do more over the longer term. This will help you to make adjustments to improve the curriculum.

p.4

designation

Leaders identify that there is still more work to do around the quality of education that pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) receive. There has been a positive change in culture. Staff increasingly accept that the progress of pupils with SEND is the responsibility of all staff, not just the SEND team. The Beacon provision is new this year. Leaders are currently refining the curriculum for pupils who access this provision for all or part of the school day.

p.4

designation

At the time of the previous inspection, a new behaviour policy had just been introduced. You have ensured that this policy is applied consistently by providing regular staff training and ‘scripts’ that teachers can use to defuse potentially difficult situations. These scripts ensure that the policy is enacted with kindness and care. It supports pupils to make the right decisions and to take responsibility for their behaviour. Staff and pupils are unanimous in praising the transformation since the previous inspection. It is allowing teachers to teach, and pupils to learn.

p.4

designation

Staff from the school have worked closely with families throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. This has included delivering food parcels to those in need, arranging physical education lessons that the whole family could be involved in, and helping parents and carers to support their children with remote learning. These initiatives, and more, have strengthened home–school relationships and allowed you to tackle effectively some of the causes of pupil absence. Leaders have transformed the way that attendance is managed in school. Each element of your attendance programme works in unison to address causes of poor attendance. Pupil absence, for non-COVID-19-related reasons, has significantly reduced. The introduction of the Beacon provision has helped, along with direct work with families, to particularly improve attendance for those pupils with additional needs.

p.5

designation

You have identified that punctuality to school and to lessons is now an area for focus. You have recently introduced some systems to help improve punctuality. It is, as yet, too early to observe whether these steps are having the desired impact.

p.5

Additional support

External support from ONE Vision partner schools and a school improvement partner has aided curriculum development. These professionals have worked with faculty leaders to develop their knowledge and understanding of effective curriculum design. Their evaluations have provided you with assurance as to the quality of the new curriculums.

p.5

Additional support

Two external reviews of SEND provision have helped you to refine your development plan so that pupils with SEND are better supported.

p.5

Evidence

During the inspection, I met with you and members of the senior leadership team with responsibilities for the curriculum, teaching and learning, safeguarding and attendance. I reviewed a range of documentation you provided. Accompanied by a senior leader, I visited a number of lessons from different faculty areas and spoke with a number of faculty leaders and teachers. I met formally with a group of pupils, spoke to others informally and observed pupils at social times and moving between lessons. I met with members of the AIB and with the CEO of the Northumberland Church of England Academy Trust.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion