Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 20 Jan 2022 · published 15 Feb 2022

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Rachel Tordoff

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    20 Jan 2022

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Rachel Tordoff

  • Postcode verified

    S41 9LG

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+12Mostly positivemore positive than 56% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositiveenjoywell-sequencedambitiousskilledpromptlyimprovingsafe
Criticismat riskrequires improvementconcernserrorsgapsstruggleharmnot consistently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1167w+12
  • Leadership204w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,368
longer than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 48
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%Leadership 15%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Tracey Burnside Headteacher Whittington Green School High Street Old Whittington Chesterfield Derbyshire S41 9LG

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 20 January 2022, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received four successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

School

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. I discussed the ongoing impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

School

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action in

order for the school to become a good school.

p.1

Context

The number of pupils on the school’s roll has grown significantly. This is mainly due to an increased number of pupils joining the school at the start of Year 7 in September 2021, compared with previous years. As a result, you have appointed more specialist teaching and support staff.

p.1

Context

You have separated the responsibility for the provision for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) and safeguarding into two distinct roles. In September 2021, a new coordinator and a new deputy coordinator for the provision for pupils with SEND were appointed. At the same time, a member of the senior leadership team took over responsibility for safeguarding.

p.2

Context

Two teachers have joined the school to teach mathematics and English. These teachers have experience working in primary schools. They work closely with younger pupils who need extra help due to the impact of the pandemic. You have appointed a specialist teacher of geography. A librarian is now in post as part of the school’s strategy to promote reading.

p.2

Context

The pandemic has meant that some plans for improvement have only been implemented recently. A review of governance has been rescheduled and is due to take place soon.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders are taking decisive steps to improve the quality of education. Their plans for improvement focus on the right priorities. They are using external support to help them review the school’s curriculum. They have prioritised teachers’ training and development. Teachers value opportunities to reflect on their practice. Regular training helps them to consider how to plan and deliver a well-sequenced curriculum. They enjoy trying out new ideas. Some teachers are taking part in extra training so that they can support others. Everyone knows what needs to improve and how they can work together to achieve this.

p.2

Main findings

Subject leaders have reviewed their key stage 3 curriculums to make sure that their plans are ambitious. Subject leaders have identified the important knowledge they want pupils to learn. They organise this knowledge logically so that pupils can build on what they already know. For example, each time pupils learn about sequences in mathematics, the sequences become more complex. Teachers break the knowledge down into manageable chunks. This helps pupils remember what they are learning. In art, pupils learn how to draw each part of a face before attempting a self-portrait. Leaders have had to change the order they intend to teach content in some subjects due to the impact of COVID-19.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers give pupils plenty of chances to recall what they know. They emphasise important subject-specific vocabulary that pupils should be familiar with. Pupils say that these recaps help them remember important information. Teachers check what pupils know and correct errors or misconceptions promptly. Pupils revisit their learning when they make mistakes to ensure that they understand. They value their teachers’ advice about how to improve. Most pupils take pride in their work. However, not all work in pupils’ books is well presented and spelling is not corrected consistently. New leaders are improving the provision for pupils with SEND. They are checking that information shared with staff about these pupils is appropriate. Teachers and teaching assistants are becoming more skilled in meeting these pupils’ needs. However, some of these pupils do not complete work fully and have gaps in their knowledge. A few pupils

p.2

Main findings

with SEND in Years 7 and 8 benefit from small-group support to improve their literacy and numeracy. Leaders plan to review the key stage 4 curriculum to make sure that pupils with SEND study appropriate qualifications. Parents and carers appreciate the chance to discuss the needs of their children with SEND during after-school drop-in sessions.

p.3

Main findings

There is an increased focus on the importance of reading and literacy across the curriculum. Pupils in Years 7, 8 and 9 benefit from timetabled reading lessons in the library. They enjoy choosing texts from different styles and genres to inspire their own writing. Some pupils in Year 7 struggle to read fluently and with confidence. A trained teacher helps these pupils improve their knowledge of phonics so that they can decode text. Staff act as positive role models for reading. Teachers share texts relevant to what pupils are studying during ‘drop everything and read’ sessions. While older pupils appreciate the importance of reading, many do not read regularly. Strategies to improve reading are relatively new. Their implementation has been slowed by COVID-19.

p.3

Main findings

Governors are well informed about leaders’ actions to improve the quality of education. They check what leaders tell them by making their own visits to school. Governors are positive about the opportunities presented by a growing school. Newly recruited staff have introduced fresh ideas for improvement. Governors ensure that any staff with concerns about their well-being are given appropriate help.

p.3

Main findings

Leaders have reorganised the safeguarding team to make sure that pupils get the right support. They know the risks that pupils face in the local community, and how these have changed during the pandemic. Pupils learn how to stay safe, including online. Leaders take appropriate and timely action when a pupil is at risk of harm. They provide these pupils with close support in school and seek help from external agencies when needed.

p.3

Main findings

During my visit, leaders acted quickly to improve some minor safeguarding procedures. Governors are due to update their safeguarding training so that they are aware of the latest changes to the national guidance.

p.3

Additional support

Leaders work closely with the local authority to evaluate the impact of their work and identify their next steps. The local authority has arranged for teachers and leaders to attend curriculum and leadership training. Staff are positive about the impact that this training is having on their practice. The local authority has forged links with local schools and a national leader of education to support leaders’ work to improve reading and the provision for pupils with SEND. This work is ongoing. Governors are keen to develop their roles. The local authority has arranged a review of governance. This review is scheduled to take place imminently.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection, I met with you and other senior leaders, including the designated safeguarding lead and the leader of the provision for pupils with SEND. I held a meeting with three governors, including the vice-chair, and met with two local authority representatives remotely to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.4

Evidence

I discussed the curriculum with teachers of mathematics, art and geography, as well as meeting with teachers of other subjects. I met with the subject leader of English and the librarian to discuss reading. I reviewed a sample of pupils’ workbooks. I spoke with two groups of pupils and heard some pupils read to an adult.

p.4

Evidence

I scrutinised a range of documents, including senior leaders’ evaluations of the school’s work and their plans to improve the school. I reviewed a range of policies and safeguarding records. I considered minutes relating to the school’s governance and a recent review of the school carried out by the local authority.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Derbyshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion