Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Wembdon St George's Church School

Inspected 13 Jan 2022 · published 15 Feb 2022 · URN 144984

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Jan 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Paula Marsh, Stewart Gale, Teresa Hill

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    TA6 7PS

  • Name on report verified

    Wembdon St George’s Church School

  • URN verified

    144984

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+35Mostly positivemore positive than 14% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivestrongstrengthwell-plannedambitiouskindhappyeffectively
Criticisminconsistenciesgapsweaknessesdisruptionconcernsstrugglenot happynot precise

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1007w+35
  • Safeguarding75w+21

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,060
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 55
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Safeguarding 5%About the inspection 35%

Full report text

Inspection of Wembdon St George’s Church School Brantwood Road, Wembdon, Bridgwater, Somerset TA6 7PS

p.1

Inspection dates: 12 and 13 January 2022

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 12 and 13 January 2022

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

This is a good school. Pupils like to attend. They feel a strong connection to the school’s vision and principles. For example, they understand the six core values, including koinonia and service, and how being kind helps to make the day better for everybody.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Wembdon St George’s Church School is a happy and safe place where pupils like to work and play together. Older pupils appreciate having opportunities to help with the running of the school. Pupils said that bullying is rare. However, if this happens, they trust teachers to listen and take swift action to intervene.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils conduct themselves well around school and in lessons. There is a calm and purposeful atmosphere. Pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), learn through a well-planned and effective curriculum. However, there are a few inconsistencies, particularly in teachers’ use of assessment in some subjects. In addition, the matching of reading books to the phonics that pupils know could be even better. This would help to get the very best for all pupils, including children in the early years foundation stage.

p.2

better?

Leaders are ambitious for pupils. Since the school joined the trust in 2017, there have been some significant staffing changes, including different headteachers. Initially, this caused some disruption. However, following the appointment of the current headteacher in early 2020, the school has gone from strength to strength. Senior leaders have established a strong culture of learning.

p.2

better?

Senior leaders, governors and trustees work together effectively. They understand the school’s strengths and weaknesses, which helps them to secure improvements. For example, together they have implemented a successful programme of professional development for subject leaders. As a result, there is now a wider pool of leadership talent and strong capacity to improve further.

p.2

better?

Leaders have overhauled the curriculum. They have taken the right steps to revisit what they want pupils to learn, from Reception to Year 6. Consequently, there is now an effective curriculum in place with coherent blocks of learning to help pupils know and remember more. Subjects are broken into logical pathways with meaningful steps for pupils to accumulate knowledge. This helps to prepare them well for the next stage in their education. However, there are still inconsistencies in how teachers use assessment information, particularly in some foundation subjects. This means that teachers are unable to identify or address gaps in pupils’ knowledge as quickly as they might in these subjects. Consequently, there are some gaps for pupils, including for pupils with SEND, in understanding the whole curriculum. 12 and 13 January 2022

p.2

3

Leaders began their work to improve the quality of education by re-energising the focus on reading. Reading is ‘front and centre’ of the curriculum. Pupils like to read. They understand its importance and read often. Teachers are effective in promoting reading for pleasure and academic progress. There is an effective early reading programme in place, starting for children in Reception and continuing into key stage 1. Pupils learn to read well through an effective phonic approach. However, at times, teachers do not provide pupils with the right books, matched precisely to pupils’ needs. Therefore, pupils do not practise the key letters and sounds they need to learn most. This holds some back, including a few pupils with SEND or who may struggle with reading. Leaders have appropriately targeted this as an area for improvement.

p.3

3

Leaders ensure that there is a strong personal, social, health and economic programme in place. This helps pupils to learn right from wrong. Pupils mostly treat each other with respect and dignity. They are kind and keen to make the school a better place for all. The school’s Christian values are central to building pupils’ character and promoting British values. For example, pupils show respect and tolerance toward those of different faiths, beliefs and backgrounds. This leads to mutual harmony in the school, and a place where everybody feels welcome and included. Staff do not tolerate antisocial behaviour. For example, there has been a recent drive to eliminate derogatory language. This has raised awareness among pupils so that they can, collectively, help to make the school an even better place for all.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders prioritise safeguarding. They are tenacious in their work to protect pupils. The school has strong safeguarding systems for recruiting and training staff and governors. Staff are quick to escalate any concerns. Leaders work well with a range of external partners to ensure pupils’ safety and their well-being. Leaders have also taken steps to help pupils recover from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, including promoting pupils’ mental health.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leaders have developed an effective curriculum. However, teachers’ assessments are not as precise as they could be in some foundation subjects. As a result, some gaps in pupils’ knowledge are not being addressed swiftly. Leaders must ensure that teachers use assessment equally well across the curriculum to help pupils achieve even more.  Leaders ensure that there is an effective phonics programme in place. However, some pupils who find reading difficult, including some with SEND, do not have phonics books that are matched exactly to their needs. This means these pupils 12 and 13 January 2022

p.3

4

are not able to practise the sounds they are learning well enough. Leaders must introduce phonic reading books with even more precision to help all pupils to keep up, or catch up, with greater consistency.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 12 and 13 January 2022

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10212161 Type of school Primary

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is a larger-than-average primary school in Wembdon, near to Bridgwater.  The predecessor school was inspected in January 2017. The school was placed in special measures.  This school joined the Bath and Wells Academies Trust in September 2017.  The school works closely with the Diocese of Bath and Wells. The school’s last National Society Statutory Inspection of Anglican and Methodist Schools was in June 2015. The effectiveness of the school, as a church school, was judged to be good.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. 12 and 13 January 2022

p.5

6

 The inspectors carried out deep dives into these subjects: early reading, mathematics, art, history and music. For each deep dive, the inspectors met with subject leaders, looked at curriculum plans, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  The lead inspector looked at the single central record and checked the school’s systems for monitoring and reporting safeguarding concerns. The lead inspector met with the designated safeguarding lead.  An inspector met with the special educational needs coordinator to help evaluate provision and practice in the school. Inspectors reviewed individual plans for pupils with SEND, to evaluate how well these are being implemented.  Inspectors spoke with a range of staff and pupils to find out what it is like to be a pupil, or to work, in this school.  The lead inspector met with a representative group of governors, trustees and

p.6

6

other trust officers, including the chief executive officer.  Inspectors reviewed key documents, including the school’s self-evaluation form, school action plans and monitoring records.  The lead inspector checked all survey responses, including those from pupils, staff and parents. This included taking into account 102 responses to Ofsted’s free-text service and Parent View. An inspector also met with some parents on the second day of the inspection.

p.6

Inspection team

Stewart Gale, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Teresa Hill Ofsted Inspector 12 and 13 January 2022

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion