Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Further education inspection (EIF)

Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council

Inspected 10 Dec 2021 · published 7 Feb 2022 · URN 53722

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Dec 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Andrea Machell, Dilys Taylor, Helen Nellist, Kim Bleasdale, Maria Rayworth, Suzanne Horner

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Previous overall AI-checked

    Outstanding

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council

  • URN verified

    53722

Page 5 of 7
Page 5 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+12Mostly positivemore positive than 7% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivesuccessfullyeffectivelygood progresspositiveenjoyproudwell supported
Criticismconcernsnot consistentlygapslacksdo not knownot clearnot effectively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionSafeguardingWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings709w+9
  • Safeguarding100w−8
  • What needs to improve84w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
864
shorter than usual (typical 1201)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 39
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 3
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%Safeguarding 8%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Further education and skills inspection report

p.1

Inspection of Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Adult learning programmes Good Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Outstanding

p.1

Information about this provider

Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council (OMBC) manages Oldham Lifelong Learning Service (the service) within its Children’s Services Directorate. The service provides programmes throughout the borough. The service offers a range of accredited and non-accredited learning opportunities, funded by the Greater Manchester Combined Authority. The provider currently has 1,244 learners enrolled on courses. The largest numbers are in English, mathematics, English for speakers of other languages (ESOL), information technology (IT) and digital skills. The remainder of learners study vocational courses in childcare and education. Approximately two thirds of the courses lead to qualifications.

p.1

Information about this provider

Programmes are taught in six lifelong learning centres and a small number of other community venues. 7–10 December 2021

p.1

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Learners display positive attitudes to their learning. They enjoy their courses, feel valued by staff and are proud to be learners at OMBC. Learners who have additional learning needs feel well supported by tutors and learning support workers.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Learners build their confidence and self-belief with the help and encouragement of tutors. For instance, learners on English courses are able to independently help their children with homework.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Learners improve their skills as a result of their courses. Level 2 IT learners develop the work skills they need to successfully create emails, letters and presentations. ESOL learners develop skills that help them become more independent in their everyday lives, such as when shopping at the supermarket, speaking to health professionals or to their children’s teachers.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Most learners receive effective guidance at the start of their course. As a result, they are enrolled on to the right level of course for their abilities and future aspirations. However, not all learners are clear on how to achieve their next steps or longer-term career aspirations.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

The vast majority of learners feel safe. They know whom to go to if they have any concerns. However, most learners only have a basic understanding of safeguarding, radicalisation or extremism. This is because tutors do not routinely and consistently check learners’ understanding.

p.2

better?

Leaders’ clear strategy for their adult learning provision is built around the needs of the local community. They have designed the curriculum so that learners can improve their lives by developing their confidence, self-esteem and skills to prepare them for training, employment or self-employment. It is leaders’ unwavering intention to help learners become self-sufficient, responsible and active citizens.

p.2

better?

Tutors teach the curriculum in a logical order. In English, mathematics, ESOL and IT, learners incrementally build their knowledge and skills. For example, mathematics learners learn about place value, estimating and rounding before moving on to more complex processes, such as handling data and probability. Level 1 IT learners learn how to proofread and edit text before moving on to more complex tasks, such as using spreadsheets.

p.2

better?

There are variations in the quality of education for learners following the IT curriculum. It is better at level 1 than at entry level. The curriculum at entry level lacks ambition. This is because all learners follow the same curriculum, despite what they already know and can do. 7–10 December 2021 Tutors have the appropriate experience and qualifications to teach their subjects. Leaders provide tutors with a range of effective training to develop their teaching skills further. This includes skills to teach remotely, for example using videoconferencing technology, breakout rooms and digital registers.

p.2

better?

Most tutors help learners to know more and remember more throughout their courses. They use assessment effectively to identify gaps in knowledge and inform teaching. In mathematics, tutors systematically check learners’ understanding of a topic before moving on to the next topic. However, entry level IT tutors do not effectively question learners to check learning or identify any gaps they may have. As a result, the majority of entry level IT learners are unable to recall what they have learned.

p.3

better?

Leaders’ and tutors’ support extends beyond the taught curriculum. They routinely promote inclusion and put the learner and the community at the heart of everything they do. Tutors provide wraparound support to learners that breaks down barriers of isolation and crosses cultural divides. Learners who need additional support receive appropriate help in class or one-to-one coaching sessions outside class.

p.3

better?

The majority of tutors do not review and update learners’ individual learning plans well enough. In English and mathematics, tutors do not consistently review learners’ long-term goals. In level 1 and entry level IT, tutors do not set clear or meaningful short-term targets for learners to achieve. This means that learners do not know the progress they make towards their targets and goals.

p.3

better?

Most learners are making at least their expected progress, with a few making good progress. Most learners achieve their learning goals. A small minority of learners progress on to higher level courses and a few progress into employment.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders and managers ensure that safeguarding and the safety of learners are high priorities. The designated safeguarding lead and staff have the appropriate training and experience to carry out their roles effectively. Staff use links to external agencies to signpost learners to additional help relating to mental health aspects, such as stress, anxiety or depression.

p.3

Safeguarding

Managers ensure that staff are recruited safely. Staff have regular training in safeguarding, including how to identify any potential mental health concerns. They know how to keep learners safe and report any concerns they may have. 7–10 December 2021

p.3

What does the provider need to do to improve?

 Leaders should ensure that staff receive appropriate training and subsequent support to enable them to successfully set clear, short-term targets and set and review long-term goals for learners.  Leaders and managers should ensure that their careers guidance helps learners to understand the full range of next steps and career options available to them.  Leaders should support tutors to routinely check learners’ understanding of safeguarding, radicalisation and extremism, so that learners know how to keep themselves, and others, safe. 7–10 December 2021

p.4

Provider details

Address Civic Centre West Street OLDHAM OL1 1UT

p.5

Early Years

Dates of previous inspection 17–20 November 2015

p.5

Early Years

Main subcontractors None 7–10 December 2021

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspection team was assisted by the assistant head of service, as nominee. Inspectors took account of the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans, and the previous inspection report. The inspection was carried out using the further education and skills inspection handbook and took into account all relevant provision at the provider. Inspectors collected a wide range of evidence to inform judgements, including visiting learning sessions, scrutinising learners’ work, seeking the views of learners, staff and other stakeholders, and examining the provider’s documentation and records.

p.6

Inspection team

Kim Bleasdale, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Suzanne Horner Her Majesty’s Inspector Andrea Machell Her Majesty’s Inspector Dilys Taylor Ofsted Inspector Helen Nellist Ofsted Inspector Maria Rayworth Ofsted Inspector 7–10 December 2021 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion