Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's home run by Aspris Children’s Services Limited
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Priory Education Services Limited
- Inspection date verified
5 Jan 2022
- Inspectors verified
Andi Lilley-Tams
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Name on report verified
1269421
- URN verified
1269421
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- For example, some risks are historic in nature, and it is unclear if the risk remains a concern. p.3
- Additionally, children have not yet formed strong friendships in the home. p.3
- For example, following a particularly serious safeguarding incident, the manager increased staffing levels and supported the staff team. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The registered person should ensure that a child’s bedroom is not generally entered without their permission, though it may be necessary to establish routines to allow for rooms to be cleaned regularly. p.5
- Usually, rooms should only be searched if the child has been informed or asked for their permission. p.5
- Immediate searching may be necessary where there are reasonable grounds for believing that there is a risk to the child’s or another person’s safety or well-being. p.5
- This specifically relates to there being a written evaluation following a room search. p.5
- Children should be consulted when a room search is happening, whenever it is safe to do so. p.5
- The registered person should ensure that children are supported to understand how to build friendships with other children. p.5
- They should be able to spend time with their friends in the local community, in their home area, and by having friends visit them at the home, in line with the child’s plans, age and understanding. p.5
- The registered person should lead and manage the home in a way that delivers the ethos, outcomes and approach set out in the home’s statement of purpose. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance4
“The staff speak positively about the management team.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,253
- about usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report children's home: 1269421 1 Registered provider: Priory Education Services Limited Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This home provides care for up-to-three children. The home is owned and operated by a private provider.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The registered manager is suitably qualified.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
Due to COVID-19, at the request of the Secretary of state, we suspended all routine inspections of social care providers carried out under the social care common inspection framework (SCCIF) on 17 March 2020. We returned to routine SCCIF inspections on 12 April 2021.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
We last visited this setting on 11 December 2020 to carry out an assurance visit. The report is published on the Ofsted website.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Date of last inspection: 18 December 2019
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: good
p.1
good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report children's home: 1269421 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
18/12/2019 Full Good 14/02/2019 Interim Declined in effectiveness 06/09/2018 Full Good Inspection report children's home: 1269421 3
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children say that where they live is ‘alright’ and they like the staff who care for them. The children do not have local friends, and at times, staff struggle to motivate the children to undertake activities outside of the home. This has been made worse due to the COVID-19 restrictions. Additionally, children have not yet formed strong friendships in the home. They are reluctant to spend time with each other. Children enjoy having close bonds with animals, and two children care for pets in their bedrooms. When children are persuaded to go out, they enjoy going for walks and shopping trips with staff. Children do have fun with staff when they spend time with them. This helps to develop stronger relationships.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
All the children had struggled with educational attendance before being cared for at this home. Since joining the home, children have made educational progress, and staff are working hard to motivate children to attend daily education. This is progressing, and overall attendance has been much improved. For example, one child, who had low school attendance, has now attended regularly since October 21.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children are encouraged to attend health appointments. Staff have been proactive in advocating for children who may have additional learning needs. For example, some children have been supported through an assessment for autism. Not all children are confident with their self-image, and some children have issues with anxiety. Children can speak with a psychological therapist who regularly visits. Although not all children engage with the therapist, some do and find this beneficial. The therapist also provides support to staff to help them better understand the needs of the children. This supports staff to improve care practice.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The manager provides very good oversight and makes certain that children and staff are safe. For example, following a particularly serious safeguarding incident, the manager increased staffing levels and supported the staff team. The efforts of the manager also ensured the placement stability for the child concerned. This child’s Independent Reviewing Officer described the manager as ‘an excellent advocate for the child’.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Children’s risk assessment documents are detailed. However, it is not always clear whether children are making progress in relation to the identified risk factors. For example, some risks are historic in nature, and it is unclear if the risk remains a concern. Staff provide good help and support to children to overcome areas of concern and risk. For example, one child who previously posed a risk to animals has now been supported to care for their own pet. This is going well, and the child is now gentle and responsible when caring for animals. Inspection report children's home: 1269421 4 Staff speak with children regularly about the children’s feelings and behaviour. The views of the child do not yet come through strongly in these discussions. Children are not yet provided with enough opportunities during conversations to express their emotions or views. Children’s documents do not demonstrate how staff have helped
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
children to reflect following situations and incidents or provided alternative courses of action to manage strong feelings and emotions.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff are trained to provide the support and help that children need if they have harmed themselves. However, more analysis and evaluation are needed when deciding to conduct a room search to remove items that could pose a risk to a child. Additionally, the relevant documents do not set out the children’s views before or following a room search taking place.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager has worked hard to improve staff retention and recruitment. Although staff turnover was higher at the beginning of the year-2021, staff retention has since improved. This has resulted in children being cared for by a stable and sufficiently skilled staff team. Staff are well trained, and they receive regular professional supervision, which keeps them on track to provide good care to children.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The staff speak positively about the management team. They unanimously enjoy their roles in caring for the children. Managers ensure that staff are thoroughly vetted to ensure they are safe to work with children. However, on one occasion, a risk assessment was not completed by the manager when there had been a historical concern about an applicant. There was no evidence of this potential risk having been evaluated before the member of staff was appointed.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Overall, the children’s records and other relevant documents are well maintained. However, there could be more consistency in ensuring that records are kept up to date. For example, when one child was being supported to improve their independence skills, there had been no recording of this since July 21. Some of the language used in documents, and in conversation by some staff, can at times appear institutionalised. For example, words such as ‘the setting’, ‘unsupervised’, ‘on-site’ and ‘contact’ are used.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The house is well maintained. Children say they have everything they need and that they enjoy their home. Stakeholder feedback is positive; they describe good communication and good care provided to children. From their starting points, all children are making good progress. Inspection report children's home: 1269421 5
p.4
Recommendations
The registered person should ensure that a child’s bedroom is not generally entered without their permission, though it may be necessary to establish routines to allow for rooms to be cleaned regularly. Usually, rooms should only be searched if the child has been informed or asked for their permission. Immediate searching may be necessary where there are reasonable grounds for believing that there is a risk to the child’s or another person’s safety or well-being. This specifically relates to there being a written evaluation following a room search. Children should be consulted when a room search is happening, whenever it is safe to do so. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 16, 3.20)
p.5
Recommendations
The registered person should ensure that children are supported to understand how to build friendships with other children. They should be able to spend time with their friends in the local community, in their home area, and by having friends visit them at the home, in line with the child’s plans, age and understanding. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 38, 8.7)
p.5
Recommendations
The registered person should lead and manage the home in a way that delivers the ethos, outcomes and approach set out in the home’s statement of purpose. They should also play a key role in shaping the ethos of the home through developing a culture of high aspiration for children which is demonstrated through the care, resources and opportunities offered to the children. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 52, 10.4)
p.5
Recommendations
The registered person should, as set out in regulations 31-33, is responsible for maintaining good employment practice. They must ensure that recruitment, supervision and performance management of staff safeguards children and minimises potential risks to them. This specifically relates to the manager completing risk assessments for new staff, when necessary, to assess potential risk posed to children. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 61 13.1)
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. Inspection report children's home: 1269421 6
p.5
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Priory Education Services Limited
p.6
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: Priory Group, Fifth Floor, 80 Hammersmith Road, London, Middlesex, W14 8UD
p.6
Children’s home details
Responsible individual: Katherine Bridon
p.6
Inspector
Andi Lilley-Tams, Social Care Inspector Inspection report children's home: 1269421 7 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion