Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Bishopshalt School

Inspected 4 Nov 2021 · published 2 Feb 2022 · URN 137633

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Luisa Bonelli (lead), Heidi Swidenbank, Janice Howkins

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    4 Nov 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Heidi Swidenbank, Janice Howkins, Luisa Bonelli

  • Postcode verified

    UB8 3RF

  • Name on report verified

    Bishopshalt School

  • URN verified

    137633

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+35Mostly positivemore positive than 29% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongwell supportedambitioushigh expectationspositiveeffectiveoutstandingenjoy
Criticismconcernslackseriouslacksstrugglenot happylowernot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1227w+33
  • Safeguarding105w+34

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,330
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 55
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Safeguarding 6%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Bishopshalt School Royal Lane, Hillingdon, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3RF

p.1

Outcome

Bishopshalt School continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy school, are safe and value their community. Leaders have recently heightened their expectations for pupils’ achievement by introducing new curriculum plans. This is having a noticeable effect in key stage 3.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Each half-term, pupils study topics associated with one of the school’s values, such as ‘show kindness’. As they grow older, they explore these themes in more depth. Dropdown days help develop traits such as resilience and character.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

A wide range of activities is available to pupils at lunchtime and after school. This offer matches pupils’ interests and talents. These clubs are well attended by pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Movement in corridors is smooth, and lining up for lunch is orderly. The behaviour of pupils leads to a calm and purposeful environment in which there is no low-level disruption. Leaders have high expectations and deal well with any bullying incidents. A clear behaviour policy is in place. This is supported by most parents, although a small number think it can be too harsh.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils feel that leaders value their views. For example, the ‘young women’ group put forward a proposal to modernise the uniform code. They wanted it to be more reflective of current workwear. Leaders accepted and implemented these changes.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Teachers have strong subject knowledge. Less experienced colleagues or non-subject specialists are well supported through the sharing of lesson plans and the joint creation of resources.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The programme of study covers all national curriculum subjects throughout Years 7 to 9. Schemes of work are currently in transition. New plans are being implemented that 3 and 4 November 2021

p.1

2

include better opportunities for pupils to revisit and build on what they have learned before. These plans also make stronger connections between topics, so that pupils are better able to apply previous learning to new contexts. This is starting to have a positive impact on pupils in key stage 3. In languages, younger pupils remember important words and can use them well in new situations when talking about themselves and their families. In geography, curriculum leaders have taken careful account of pupils’ prior learning in primary schools when planning their new curriculum for Years 7 to 9. This has improved pupils’ learning and has also led to greater uptake at GCSE.

p.2

2

Key stage 4 pupils, who have not benefited as much from the revised curriculum, find recall of prior learning in languages harder. They rely too much on the support the teacher provides, and they struggle to produce their own work. Leaders understand that better performance in languages will help increase English Baccalaureate uptake. Leaders have made following through curriculum improvements into key stage 4 an important priority.

p.2

2

Another strategy introduced by leaders across the school is a focus on assessment as a means of checking pupils’ recall and understanding. This includes questions at the start of lessons which require pupils to recall and deepen prior learning. This has been particularly powerful in geography, and in the sixth form where recall and discussion are helping to develop students’ higher-level thinking skills.

p.2

2

Pupils with SEND are able to access the full curriculum and study all subjects. They are well supported by teaching assistants and the strategies in their ‘learning passports’. This enables them to build up their knowledge well. Some pupils with SEND had previously been part of a ‘nurture group’ in Years 7 and 8, with a reduced curriculum. This did not include languages. Leaders have now discontinued this practice. The SEND department is supporting language teachers in ensuring these pupils are fully able to access learning in this area. In a small number of lessons, including in mathematics, work set for pupils with SEND could be more ambitious. This is a key area for further improvement.

p.2

2

Pupils behave well in lessons. This has a positive effect on their learning. Pupils are well guided in choosing their future careers. Speakers visit the school and tell them about various routes, including apprenticeships. Pupils with SEND are accompanied on visits to colleges. Older students organise talks and help younger pupils to access information. One example is a society which aims to encourage disadvantaged pupils to consider study in the medical sciences. This is part of the school’s drive to raise pupils’ aspirations.

p.2

2

The majority of staff feel well supported working at the school. Those at the start of their careers feel confident in approaching leaders with any concerns. Teachers appreciate leaders’ recent change of policy regarding marking as it reduced workload. Many staff value the school’s investment in their professional learning. However, a small number of teachers remain concerned about tight deadlines and a lack of clear expectations from senior leaders. 3 and 4 November 2021

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Clear systems and procedures for safeguarding are in place. Leaders check these regularly. Systems for confidentially sharing knowledge about individual pupils are strong. This enables leaders to intervene promptly when necessary.

p.3

Safeguarding

Pupils speak with honesty about local dangers. They trust the school and value the support it offers, including when they had experienced anxiety during the lockdown. Leaders have developed internal help, for example to deal with mental health issues. They work well with external agencies but were aware of the lack of resources during the pandemic. Leaders have offered training to staff on rebuilding pupils’ emotional well- being.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leaders have made a promising start on revising the curriculum across all subjects. This work is most effective in key stage 3. Older pupils have not benefited as much, and curriculum plans in key stage 4 are not as advanced. For this reason, transitional arrangements have been applied. Leaders should continue to revise curriculum plans into Years 10 and 11. They should also ensure that improvements in Years 7 to 9 result in greater participation in the English Baccalaureate.  Key improvements have been made for pupils with SEND, who now have access to the full range of curriculum subjects. However, in some subjects, the work set for these pupils lacks ambition. This includes in mathematics. Leaders should ensure that the work set for pupils with SEND is as ambitious as that set for other pupils, in all subjects.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called a section 8 inspection of a good or outstanding school, because it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on a section 8 inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a section 5 inspection. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the section 8 inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the section 8 inspection as a section 5 inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second section 8 inspection since we judged the predecessor school, Bishopshalt School, to be good in February 2012. 3 and 4 November 2021

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 3 and 4 November 2021

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10204479 Type of school Other secondary

p.5

provision

Number of pupils on the school roll 1309

p.5

form

Appropriate authority The Board of trustees

p.5

form

Website www.bishopshalt.hillingdon.sch.uk

p.5

form

Date of previous inspection 6 December 2016, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school currently uses one external alternative provider, The Skills Hub, and an internal alternative provision, Almitas House.

p.5

Information about this inspection

This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 This is the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with school leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation.  During the inspection, inspectors spoke with pupils about life at school and their work. Inspectors held meetings with senior leaders, subject leaders, lead practitioners, 3 and 4 November 2021

p.5

6

teachers and governors, and had a telephone discussion with the principal of the alternative provision.  Information regarding pupils’ and students’ attendance and behaviour was scrutinised.  Inspectors considered the views expressed by parents and carers in the 102 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Ofsted Parent View, including comments received via the free-text facility. Inspectors considered the 34 responses to a questionnaire for staff. The questionnaire for pupils received no response.  The inspection focused deeply on English, mathematics, science, languages and geography. Inspectors met with subject leaders, spoke with pupils, visited lessons, looked at pupils’ work and met with teaching staff. Other subjects were considered as part of the inspection.  Inspectors reviewed a range of documentation about safeguarding, including the school’s record of checks undertaken on newly appointed staff and the support

p.6

Inspection team

Luisa Bonelli, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Janice Howkins Ofsted Inspector 3 and 4 November 2021

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion