Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Further education inspection (EIF)

Langdon College

Inspected 18 Nov 2021 · published 28 Jan 2022 · URN 131910

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    18 Nov 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Deborah Vaughan-Jenkins, Suzanne Wainwright, Tracy Gillett

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Name on report verified

    Langdon College

  • URN verified

    131910

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+50Positivemore positive than 92% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyambitiouseffectivesuccessfullyrespectfulconfidentmake good progressnurturing
Criticismnot alwaysinsufficientconcernsnot ambitiousunclearlimitedlowernot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspectionSafeguarding positive critical
  • Findings1122w+45
  • Safeguarding153w+25
  • What needs to improve232w+60

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,465
about usual (typical 1228)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 40
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
7
typical 5
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 57%Safeguarding 8%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 23%

Full report text

Further education and skills inspection report

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Provision for learners with high needs Requires improvement Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement

p.1

Information about this provider

Langdon College is part of the Langdon Foundation; a registered charity and company limited by guarantee. The college is a registered charity in its own right. It is a small residential and day college that provides education and support primarily for Jewish students who have a variety of learning difficulties and/or disabilities. Around half of the students have autistic spectrum disorder. The college has two centres. One centre is in Salford, Greater Manchester; the second centre is in Edgware, north London. Leaders have recently moved from the previous campus to larger premises in London. They have continued their partnership arrangements with a Jewish school in London for a few students. These students attend the Edgware centre.

p.1

Information about this provider

At the time of the inspection, eight students attended the Salford centre and 28 attended the centre in Edgware. 16–18 November 2021

p.1

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Staff have created an inclusive and nurturing environment where students feel safe and can be themselves. Students told us that staff promote kindness and teamwork. They learn how to take turns and are polite and respectful to others. For example, students are confident enough to ask their peers not to interrupt others when they are speaking.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

More-able students benefit from resources relating to real-life situations that help them to prepare effectively for adulthood. For example, in mathematics, tutors use customer guides from large banks to teach students about money management. They understand about credit cards, debt and the risks of borrowing from unreputable sources.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Staff use a variety of strategies to help students to successfully self-regulate their behaviour. For example, they use ‘screen time’ in lessons to give students a short break from learning activities and use ‘zones of regulation’ effectively to help students to identify and manage behavioural triggers. Consequently, students are well-behaved for most of the time.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Staff focus considerably on supporting students’ physical and mental well-being. They encourage students to eat a balanced diet and to keep fit. For example, students consider which foods and drinks are higher in fats and sugars. They take part in ‘the active mile’ initiative. This resulted in a few students successfully completing a 10-kilometre run. Others have found that they can now walk much further without getting tired or breathless.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Students access a reasonable range of additional activities, such as swimming and dance that staff use effectively to support and build on students’ social interaction skills and self-confidence. Staff supplement these activities with trips, which include a local Royal Air Force museum and an exploration of Chinatown.

p.2

better?

Leaders and managers have not developed an ambitious enough curriculum that helps students to fully achieve the outcomes that they are capable of. The curriculum rationale for the different learning pathways is unclear. Leaders and managers cannot explain clearly how these pathways develop and build on students’ knowledge and skills over time. While students make good progress in a range of skills such as communication, social development, resilience and confidence, they do not have an individualised, well-structured programme of learning that focuses on the knowledge and skills that they need for their next stage in education, employment or independence. 16–18 November 2021 Students’ targets are too broad. Targets do not directly reflect students’ individual needs and abilities, or the activities they complete. All students work on two knowledge/skills targets per month even though some students could achieve more.

p.2

better?

Targets do not routinely include the redevelopment of skills such as travel training and social skills that students lost due to the national restrictions during the pandemic. As a result, tutors do not have a sufficient oversight of the progress that students make or could make over time.

p.3

better?

Tutors do not plan students’ development of English and mathematical skills clearly and logically enough. While they integrate English and mathematical skills into a wide range of activities across the college, this approach relies heavily on the effectiveness of tutors’ skills. More-experienced English and mathematics tutors personalise learning for the range of students’ abilities in their group. However, in other instances, for example in pre-entry level lessons, reading and comprehension resources are too complex. Students are only able to answer questions correctly when they are heavily supported or prompted.

p.3

better?

Students benefit from comprehensive sensory, occupational, and speech and language therapy assessments. Staff use the resulting personalised therapy programmes effectively to support students’ needs in a range of lessons and activities that they build on over time. For example, into music lessons and practical activities such as arts and crafts. These specialist therapies help students to progressively reduce their barriers to learning. Therapists provide support to parents/carers to help them to understand their young person’s needs. This has a positive impact on students’ lives outside college, such as being able to attend a local café on their own.

p.3

better?

Tutors and support staff work effectively together. Learning support assistants (LSAs) provide useful prompts for students that help most students to participate fully in lessons. Staff help students to understand and cope with difficult situations both in and outside college. For example, they used role play to help students problem-solve a disagreement over insufficient seating space when students shared a taxi to the college. Staff reduce students’ support over time as students develop their independence.

p.3

better?

Tutors and LSAs do not always ensure that they challenge the more-able students to extend their learning beyond a basic understanding of the topic. For example, in English and mathematics lessons, a few learners are working in groups with others of a lower ability, yet they are completing the same tasks. They are therefore unable to broaden their knowledge in these subjects.

p.3

better?

Attendance is high. Most students are motivated and keen to learn in their lessons. They are confident to speak out to answer questions, or to share an idea. The standard of most students’ practical work is high. They develop useful life skills such as budgeting and understanding how to shop for specific ingredients.

p.3

better?

Staff promote the values of tolerance, fairness, and individual liberty successfully in 16–18 November 2021 lessons and activities. They encourage students to embrace difference. For example, tutors use their rich range of international heritage to help students to understand about different cultures. Students discuss a range of pertinent topics such as Black History month and the impact of influential figures, such as Rosa Parks. They are very respectful towards each other and show an acceptance and understanding of each other’s disabilities. Students run an active student voice group with teacher support that helps them to influence leaders’ decisions. Student representatives are voted in democratically by their peers. Recent requests from the group for more computers and more tables in the social area have been actioned by managers.

p.3

better?

Students receive impartial advice and guidance throughout their programme. While this is generally effective, careers advice is not always sufficiently timely for the small number of students who want to gain employment. As a result, students are not always as prepared as they could be. For example, the curriculum does not focus on developing the specific knowledge and skills that students need to secure their preferred job role or more ambitious employment options.

p.4

better?

Governors have revised their membership to ensure that they have the skills and experience required to be an effective board. They are well informed about actions that leaders take to improve the quality of students’ experiences across both campuses. They communicate regularly with all staff and students to develop a good understanding of life at the college. However, their knowledge and understanding of an ambitious curriculum is limited. They cannot explain the rationale for the current provision.

p.4

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.4

Safeguarding

Leaders, governors and staff place a high priority on safeguarding their students. Designated safeguarding leads, staff and governors across both centres are appropriately trained. Leaders have implemented comprehensive safeguarding and ‘Prevent’ duty policies and procedures that they update regularly. For example, leaders have included specific references to the prevention of sexual abuse, including peer-on-peer abuse.

p.4

Safeguarding

Leaders have established effective partnerships with external agencies to ensure that students are fully supported if they have any concerns. They use innovative activities to help students to understand how to keep themselves safe, for example developing students’ confidence to speak to police officers and using an external puppet company to explain safeguarding concepts. Staff ensure students have an appropriate understanding of what constitutes healthy relationships, including sexual relationships and consent. Leaders carry out the necessary checks to ensure the suitability of new staff to work at the college. 16–18 November 2021

p.4

What does the provider need to do to improve?

 Leaders and managers should develop a coherent curriculum with a clear rationale that helps students to fully achieve the outcomes of which they are capable.  Leaders and tutors should ensure that students’ knowledge/skills targets are individualised, ambitious and help students to achieve the knowledge, skills and behaviours that they need for their next stage of education, employment or independence.  Leaders and managers should ensure that tutors plan an English and mathematics curriculum that meets the needs and abilities of each student. They should ensure that it helps students to develop these skills at the pace and level of which they are capable.  Leaders and managers should ensure that tutors and LSAs consistently challenge the more-able students to extend their learning beyond a basic understanding of a topic.  Leaders and managers should ensure that students receive appropriate careers

p.5

What does the provider need to do to improve?

advice when it is needed so that students develop the specific skills they need for the job roles they are capable of securing.  Governors should ensure that they understand the curriculum rationale for the learning programmes they offer so that they can hold leaders to account for the quality of education students receive. 16–18 November 2021

p.5

Provider details

Address 9 Leicester Avenue Salford Langdon College Manchester M7 4HA

p.6

Provider details

Provider type Independent specialist college

p.6

Provider details

Date of previous inspection 11–13 December 2017

p.6

Provider details

Main subcontractors None 16–18 November 2021

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspection team was assisted by the assistant principal (Salford), as nominee. Inspectors took account of the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans, and the previous inspection report. The inspection was carried out using the further education and skills inspection handbook and took into account all relevant provision at the provider. Inspectors collected a wide range of evidence to inform judgements, including visiting learning sessions, scrutinising students’ work, seeking the views of students, staff and other stakeholders, and examining the provider’s documentation and records.

p.7

Inspection team

Suzanne Wainwright, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Tracy Gillett Ofsted Inspector Deborah Vaughan-Jenkins Her Majesty’s Inspector 16–18 November 2021 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion