Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Kingsmead School
Summary
Lesley Yates (lead), Alexander Laney, Clare Considine, Jane Epton, Marie McMahon, Peter Bassett
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
2 Dec 2021
- Inspectors verified
Alexander Laney, Clare Considine, Jane Epton, Lesley Yates, Marie McMahon, Peter Bassett
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Outstanding
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
WS12 1DH
- Name on report verified
Kingsmead School
- URN verified
142313
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentOutstanding
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Behaviour5
“Bullying is extremely rare.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,060
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 58, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 12 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Kingsmead School Kings Avenue, Hednesford, Cannock, Staffordshire WS12 1DH
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Outstanding Leadership and management Good Sixth-form provision Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 1 and 2 December 2021
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils thrive at Kingsmead School. Leaders promote the school values of resilience, innovation, mindfulness, and employability (RIME) effectively in all aspects of school life. As a result, pupils develop into respectful, active citizens who contribute positively to society.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Behaviour in lessons and at social times is very good. Bullying is extremely rare. If it does happen, staff deal with it effectively. Pupils feel valued and know that staff want the best for them. Pupils enjoy school, attend regularly and feel safe.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders have high aspirations for what pupils can achieve. Pupils follow a broad, balanced curriculum. Specialist teachers deliver lessons well in all subjects, across all year groups. As a result, all pupils in Year 11 last year went on to education, employment or training. Most students in Year 13 went on to higher education.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
All pupils have access to a rich set of experiences. The school offers over 60 clubs in a wide variety of activities. Trips include to the Black Country Museum and Winter Wonderland. Pupils value these opportunities. Leaders listen to pupils and value their opinions. For example, pupils on the RIME panel decide which bids for cross- curricular projects they will allocate funding to.
p.2
better?
Leaders have thought carefully about the subjects that pupils study. Pupils follow a wide range of subjects at key stage 3. All pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), study the full range of subjects. This prepares them well for the choices they make at key stage 4. A full range of academic and vocational subjects are offered at key stage 4 and key stage 5. Leaders match these well to pupils’ abilities and interests. As a result, many pupils in Year 11 stay on to study in Year 12. While the number of pupils studying the English Baccalaureate (a specific set of subjects at GCSE level) is low, leaders are taking effective action to address this.
p.2
better?
The curriculum is well planned and sequenced. Leaders check regularly how well the curriculum is being taught. This leads to improvements. For example, weaknesses in pupils’ writing in history has been improved with support from the English department.
p.2
better?
Teachers use assessment information well to identify gaps in pupils’ learning. This includes the use of personal learning checklists. Consequently, all pupils achieve well. Pupils speak about how retrieval practice and feedback sessions in lessons help them to learn and remember more. In the majority of lessons, teachers use questioning effectively to check pupils’ understanding. However, occasionally, teachers miss the chance to use questioning to deepen pupils’ understanding and knowledge. 1 and 2 December 2021
p.2
3
Leaders give high priority to improving pupils’ reading. All pupils follow a reading programme. Extra help is given to those who need it. For example, governors and sixth-form students listen to pupils read.
p.3
3
Staff get advice about how to support learning for pupils with SEND from one-page profiles. However, sometimes this advice is not precise enough. Education, health and care (EHC) plans are not always reviewed in a timely way.
p.3
3
Staff apply the school’s behaviour policy well. There is an appropriate use of rewards and sanctions. Pupils say that sanctions are fair. Staff help pupils to reflect on their own behaviour. As a result, the number of suspensions is low. Pupils value the rewards they earn. They engage well in their learning.
p.3
3
Pupils say they appreciate how much ‘extra’ they get at Kingsmead. Student leadership programmes are well established. For example, all pupils can take part in the ‘Kingsmead Edge’ programme. This leads to a leadership qualification based on the RIME values. All students in Year 12 take part in academic coaching of younger pupils. Pupils receive effective careers information, education and guidance. This begins in Year 7. Students in the sixth form follow the principles of the sixth-form charter well. This prepares them effectively for the next stage in their education. As a result, many students go on to study at prestigious universities.
p.3
3
All staff speak highly about the support they get from leaders. This includes those who are new to teaching. Leaders are mindful of staff workload. For example, staff say that staff meetings are purposeful. As a result, staff morale is high.
p.3
3
Trustees and governors are committed to the school and its pupils. They provide an effective balance of support and challenge to leaders. For example, they hold leaders to account for the management and allocation of the school’s budget.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Staff take pupils’ welfare seriously. For instance, leaders asked pupils about areas of the school where they felt less safe. As a result, lighting in areas of the school has been improved.
p.3
Safeguarding
Staff report concerns about pupils, confident in the knowledge that leaders will deal with them effectively. All staff receive regular and appropriate training. Leaders have found creative ways to ensure that safeguarding is at the forefront of everyone’s minds. This includes having a school safeguarding song.
p.3
Safeguarding
Appropriate checks are completed on all adults who work at, or visit, the school.
p.3
Safeguarding
Pupils say they feel safe. Parents agree. 1 and 2 December 2021
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The information provided in a pupil’s one-page SEND profile is not sufficiently clear and concise. Also, the monitoring of SEND provision is not robust enough to always ensure the timely completion of the annual review of pupils’ EHC plans. Leaders should ensure teachers are provided with clear advice to support the learning of pupils with SEND and that there is better monitoring of SEND provision. This will help to ensure that pupils with SEND achieve the best possible outcomes.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 1 and 2 December 2021
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10201041 Type of school Secondary Comprehensive
p.5
provision
Number of pupils on the school roll 1180
p.5
sixth form
Date of previous inspection January 2018
p.5
Information about this school
The school does not use alternative provision. The school meets the requirements of the Baker Clause. This means that pupils in Years 8 to 13 receive information about the full range of education and training options open to them. This includes opportunities for a range of education and training providers to speak to pupils about technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspector(s) carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 1 and 2 December 2021
p.5
6
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with school leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation. Inspectors met with the headteacher, other senior leaders, staff, members of the governing body, including the chair, trustees, the chief executive officer and pupils. Inspectors carried out deep dives in English, science, history, mathematics and modern foreign languages. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, looked at curriculum plans and visited a sample of lessons. Inspectors met with teachers and spoke with pupils about their learning. Inspectors also scrutinised samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors visited lessons in other subjects and reviewed pupils’ work in those lessons. Inspectors spoke with pupils at social times during the day about the wider aspects of school life.
p.6
6
Inspectors evaluated a range of school documents and looked at information on the school’s website. The lead inspector checked the single central record and the procedures for the recruitment of staff. She also met with the school’s safeguarding team, including the designated safeguarding lead. Inspectors considered responses to the online questionnaire, Ofsted Parent View, and the responses to Ofsted’s pupil and staff questionnaires.
p.6
Inspection team
Lesley Yates, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Alexander Laney Her Majesty's Inspector 1 and 2 December 2021
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion