Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

Kings London

Inspected 2 Dec 2021 · published 22 Jan 2022 · URN 1159264

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    2 Dec 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Barnaby Dowell, Victoria Jones

  • Helped and protected verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    BR3 4PR

  • Name on report verified

    Kings London

  • URN verified

    1159264

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+71Very positivemore positive than 86% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveenjoypositivestronglymake good progresswell-plannedstrongsafe
Criticismconcernslow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1078w+71
  • What needs to improve51w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,127
shorter than usual (typical 1609)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 43
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
1%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection report for boarding school: Kings London 1 Kings London United Language Schools Ltd 25 Beckenham Road, Beckenham, London BR3 4PR

p.1

Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this boarding school

Kings London is part of Kings Education, which runs international colleges in the United Kingdom and United States of America. Students come from all over the world and undertake a range of academic and English language courses. Children under the age of 18 stay with host families during their studies. There are currently 82 students on roll and nine of these are under the age of 18 and are staying with host families. There are no children under the age of 16. These nine children were placed from several different countries, including Iran, Vietnam and Brazil.

p.1

Information about this boarding school

The setting was registered with Ofsted on 1 January 2016.

p.1

Information about this boarding school

This inspection involved meetings with seven children, visits to three host families, and discussions with all the staff within the school who support children placed with host families. A questionnaire was also shared for staff and host families who wished to contribute their views. One response was received, and this offered positive feedback.

p.1

Information about this boarding school

Due to COVID-19, at the request of the Secretary of State, we suspended all routine inspections of social care providers carried out under the social care common inspection framework (SCCIF) on 17 March 2020. We returned to routine SCCIF inspections on 12 April 2021.

p.1

Information about this boarding school

We last visited this setting on 31 October 2017 to carry out a full inspection. The report is published on the Ofsted website.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and young people are helped and protected good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good Inspection report for boarding school: Kings London 2 The boarding school provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: good

p.2

good

Date of last inspection: 31 October 2017 Inspection report for boarding school: Kings London 3

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children value the opportunity of staying with host families as a means of developing their studies and their understanding of the English language and culture. Children told the inspectors that their host families are ‘very friendly’ and some children are planning to extend their stays. Children are offered individualised courses specific to their interests and make good progress. Many children successfully transition from the school to further education in this country and across Europe.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Induction is good and expectations are clearly explained to children prior to their arrival. This is of particular significance given the anxieties felt by children travelling abroad without their families and during the pandemic. At present, not all children are given a photograph of their bedroom prior to their arrival. This would help children in preparing for their stay.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

On arrival in the country, children enjoy a well-planned induction. This includes prompt access to healthcare services and an orientation of the London area and transport links. Children also receive information to enhance their knowledge of British culture, such as the importance of queuing while in public. This helps children settle quickly into their new environment.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children’s views are regularly sought on important issues such as their relationships with host families. One child told the inspector that his concerns were swiftly acted on after he expressed worries over the quality of his accommodation. In addition, another child attends the student council. This helps children feel heard and represented.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Host families reported that they value the opportunity to learn about new cultures. Training offered by the school offers insight into the different cultural practices, such as particular laundry and food preparation routines. One host family spoke about a recent visit to a friend in China, whom they had cared for 12 years previously. Host families said that they enjoy offering the children a ‘home from home experience’.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

All host families are within 30 minutes’ walking distance of the school. This allows children easy access to a full range of out-of-school activities offered by the school. Activities include bowling, football, pilates, debating clubs and ice-skating. This helps children to build peer relationships and stay healthy.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Host families help children to develop their independence skills. One child spoke of his excitement at learning to cook for the first time. Another child spoke about feeling that he had really ‘matured’ since his arrival in the country. Inspection report for boarding school: Kings London 4

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

The school has a good safeguarding culture linked strongly to academic attendance and attainment. Safeguarding concerns are quickly shared with relevant professionals via the school’s computer information system. This ensures close communication between academic and accommodation staff.

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Host families report strong levels of advice and guidance. This includes a 24-hour emergency helpline which acts as a source of support to families and children. This helpline offers host families advice on the rare occasions that difficulties arise, such as when a child returns home late.

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Children are offered good access to independent support. The school’s welfare officer is a trained counsellor and is well known to children. Posters around the school building offer photographs and contact details of safeguarding leads and the independent listener. This offers children a comprehensive level of support.

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Staff understand their safeguarding responsibilities and work in partnership with parents to support children. Recently, this included restricting a child from having an overnight stay where it was not possible to fully risk assess the chosen venue.

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Staff are proactive and seek creative solutions to help children. During the pandemic, children underwent the required ‘quarantine period’ together in a home outside of London. This kept children safe and allowed them to acclimatise to the country while building relationships with their peers.

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Children’s personal safety is prioritised. Children learn important strategies such as limiting mobile phone use in public and remaining alert in the community.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Management of the home-stay provision is good and supported by the effective oversight of the governing body. The headteacher and accommodation manager have each been in post for four years. This helps to create stability and positive working relationships. Leaders understand the complex challenge posed by children moving abroad and away from their families for the first time.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Leaders have continued to develop the school during the pandemic. The numbers of children registered in the school from the United Kingdom have increased. This allows children staying with host families to broaden their friendship groups and their knowledge of spoken English.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Numbers of children placed with host families are low. This enables leaders to have a close working relationship with host families, understand their needs and match children with them appropriately. This is evidenced by the success of placements and the positive views of children expressed to inspectors. Inspection report for boarding school: Kings London 5 Management monitoring systems are effective. Regular communication with teaching staff carefully tracks attendance, engagement, and academic progress. When difficulties occur, such as a child feeling tired, leaders liaise quickly with host families to seek solutions.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The accommodation manager rigorously reviews the quality of accommodation and the host families’ compliance with both mandatory training and safety checks such as annual gas certification. This ensures that home-stay accommodation is safe. Host families receive ongoing support such as refresher training and ‘host parent’ events at school.

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The accommodation manager generally ensures that the recruitment of host families is safe. However, the verbal verification of references is not routinely recorded. This presents a minor shortfall in recruitment practice.

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Staff morale is positive. Staff report regular supervision and effective performance appraisal. Staff feel that the immense difficulties posed by the restrictions of the pandemic have brought the staff team closer together.

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Leaders advocate strongly for children. They liaise effectively with the headteacher to support children who are struggling. Solutions such as using a ‘buddy’ system work well and ensure that children enjoy their stay with host families. Inspection report for boarding school: Kings London 6

p.5

Recommendations

 The registered person should ensure that further enhancement is made in safer recruitment practice by recording the verbal recording verification of references.  The registered person should ensure that improvement is made in the induction process by providing all children with a photograph of their bedroom, prior to their arrival.

p.6

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’. This inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for boarding school: Kings London 7

p.6

Boarding school details

Social care unique reference number: 1159264

p.7

Boarding school details

Headteacher/teacher in charge: Adam Whitbread

p.7

Boarding school details

Email address: london@kingseducation.com

p.7

Inspectors

Barnaby Dowell, Social Care Inspector (lead) Victoria Jones, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for boarding school: Kings London 8 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

Inspectors

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspectors

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

Inspectors

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion