Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Ashford Hill Primary School

Inspected 12 Nov 2021 · published 21 Jan 2022 · URN 115921

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Lea Hannam (lead), Shaun Jarvis (lead), Jon Hills

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    12 Nov 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Jon Hills, Lea Hannam, Shaun Jarvis

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    RG19 8BB

  • Name on report verified

    Ashford Hill Primary School

  • URN verified

    115921

Page 2 of 8
Page 2 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2011.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−24Mixedmore positive than 53% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehigh expectationsclearlymake good progresswell-plannedwell plannedwell sequencedenjoypolite
Criticismnot alwaysweaknessesnot effectiveconcernsnot consistentlylacklackstoo many

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1199w−5
  • Safeguarding161w−75

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,325
about usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Plain English
Flesch 60, typical 53
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 6
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Safeguarding 8%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of Ashford Hill Primary School Ashford Hill Road, Ashford Hill, Thatcham, Berkshire RG19 8BB

p.1

Inspection dates: 10 to 12 November 2021

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Inadequate Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good 10 to 12 November 2021

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy attending this small, welcoming school. They are polite and respectful to each other and to staff and visitors. Pupils attend well and most have positive attitudes to their learning, following the school’s motto: ‘Be the best we can be’. Pupils are confident to ask for help when they need it during lessons.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Despite this, staff do not have consistently high enough expectations of pupils’ attitudes towards their learning. This means that too many pupils lack focus and do not take enough pride in their work. This often goes unnoticed by staff. As a result, pupils do not reach their full potential.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils spoken to during the inspection said that they feel happy and safe at Ashford Hill. They say that bullying is very rare and that pupils are kind to each other. Most know who to go to if they have concerns, but some say they do not have a trusted adult they can talk to. Staff and leaders do not consistently recognise the concerns about pupils’ welfare that could be indicators of something more serious. Consequently, staff and leaders do not meet their safeguarding duties.

p.2

better?

There have been changes in the leadership of the school over the last year. The school is currently led by an interim headteacher who took up her post in September 2021. The interim headteacher quickly reviewed the school’s strengths and priorities for improvement. This means that she has an accurate view of the school. As a result, she has already begun to make important changes.

p.2

better?

Governors have provided challenge and support to leaders over time. However, they have not had a sharp enough focus on safeguarding or the curriculum. They have accepted too much of what leaders have told them without question. This means that they have not identified quickly what it is that needs to be prioritised for improvement.

p.2

better?

Weaknesses in the school’s phonics programme were identified when the interim headteacher started at the school. Consequently, she introduced a new phonics programme. Training provided to all staff means that they now have a better understanding of how to teach phonics. Staff have spent time ensuring that the books pupils read match the sounds they learn. Pupils are now making more progress with reading because of these changes. Regular checks on pupils’ phonics mean that those who fall behind are identified and can receive the support they need to catch up.

p.2

better?

The mathematics curriculum is in an earlier stage of development. Leaders are working closely with the local authority to improve it further. The curriculum clearly identifies what pupils will learn and when. However, the pandemic and the changes 10 to 12 November 2021

p.2

3

in leadership mean that developments in mathematics are not as far forward as leaders would have liked.

p.3

3

Leaders know that many other subjects need further development. Curriculum planning lacks precision and this means that teachers do not have enough information to ensure that pupils make the progress they are capable of. Leaders have identified the broad skills and knowledge they want pupils to have. However, they have not thought carefully enough about the more detailed elements they want pupils to understand in order to grasp the larger areas.

p.3

3

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are identified quickly and support is provided. Personalised learning plans help staff to support pupils in lessons. These plans identify the help each pupil needs. The special educational needs coordinator monitors each plan. However, leaders are aware that this monitoring could be strengthened to check more clearly that the support given is making the required impact.

p.3

3

Children get off to a good start in the early years. They begin to learn to read as soon as they start school. They learn to use numbers and do so confidently. Staff communicate with children as much as possible. This leads to children having a deep understanding of many topics. For example, children excitedly told the lead inspector all they knew about London, including facts about Big Ben and the Houses of Parliament. Staff have high expectations of these children and they make good progress. As a result, they are prepared well for key stage 1.

p.3

3

Pupils’ personal development is a strength of the school. A well-planned personal, social, health and economic programme gives pupils the knowledge and understanding they need as they move through the school. This also helps to prepare pupils as they move on at the end of Year 6. Pupils take part in music and sports clubs. Pupil leadership is important at the school. Pupils who become ‘head pupils’ proudly lead weekly assemblies celebrating the achievements of others.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Staff do not understand how to keep pupils safe. Systems and processes for recording concerns about pupils, and actions taken, are poor. Staff do not always recognise indicators that could suggest a pupil needs help. Staff do not routinely share concerns about pupils with leaders. When concerns are shared, leaders do not always identify patterns because they do not have a clear oversight of each pupil. Consequently, leaders do not always escalate concerns to external agencies when they should, nor do they sufficiently document the progress of referrals made. The interim headteacher has begun to tackle some of these weaknesses. However, she knows that there is still much to do.

p.3

Safeguarding

Governors’ oversight of safeguarding lacks rigour. They have not checked carefully enough that the systems in place to safeguard pupils are being followed. They have 10 to 12 November 2021

p.3

4

not challenged leaders sufficiently to ensure that staff and leaders meet their safeguarding duties.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. This means that pupils are at risk. Leaders need to make sure that all staff are aware of their safeguarding responsibilities. Staff need to be more alert to pupils’ welfare concerns and how these should be recorded and escalated. Leaders should ensure that record- keeping is accurate and that the actions taken are recorded clearly. Leaders need to ensure that referrals to external agencies are made in a timely manner and that the progress of each of these referrals is carefully monitored.  Governors do not have an accurate view of the school, particularly safeguarding. Staff and leaders do not meet their safeguarding duties. Governors need to ensure that they challenge leaders more robustly, carefully record their actions and monitor these for impact.  In several foundation subjects, curriculum planning is not thought out well enough. Leaders do not identify precisely enough the knowledge and skills pupils

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

should learn and in what order. This means that pupils do not make the progress they could. Leaders need to review the foundation subjects so that they are consistently well planned and well sequenced.  Staff do not have consistently high expectations of pupils’ behaviour and learning. This means that too many pupils lack focus and do not learn as well as they could. Staff do not act quickly enough. Leaders need to raise the expectations of pupils’ behaviour and learning, and ensure that these expectations are commonly understood and applied by staff.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school. 10 to 12 November 2021

p.4

5

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 10 to 12 November 2021

p.5

School details

Inspection number 10211094 Type of school Primary

p.6

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.6

School details

Headteacher Sharon Pole (interim headteacher)

p.6

School details

Date of previous inspection 14 December 2016, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.6

Information about this school

 The school is currently led by an interim headteacher.  The substantive headteacher recently left the school.  The school does not currently use any alternative provision.

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We deemed the inspection a section 5 inspection under the same Act. The initial inspection under section 8 and the final section 5 inspection were led by different inspectors.

p.6

Information about this inspection

In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty's Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform. 10 to 12 November 2021

p.6

7

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with school leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics and history. They discussed the curriculum with leaders, staff and pupils, visited lessons, looked at pupils’ work and heard pupils read.  Inspectors met with the interim headteacher, other school leaders, staff, pupils and those with responsibility for governance, including the chair of the governing body and the governor responsible for safeguarding. Inspectors scrutinised minutes of governing body meetings.  Inspectors visited the early years provision.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school.  Inspectors scrutinised the school’s self-evaluation and school development plan.

p.7

7

 Inspectors met with representatives of the local authority and also looked at records of local authority visits to the school.  Inspectors met with leaders to discuss the provision for pupils with SEND.  Inspectors considered the responses to the confidential staff survey. They took account of the responses to Ofsted’s Parent View questionnaire and comments made by those who responded. They also considered correspondence from parents alongside other evidence.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors looked at the school’s website and policies, met with designated safeguarding leaders and spoke with pupils and staff. They scrutinised records of the safeguarding checks carried out on adults working at the school and spoke with governors. Inspectors scrutinised a selection of child protection records, both electronically and in paper format. They scrutinised a range of other safeguarding paperwork.

p.7

Inspection team

Shaun Jarvis, lead inspector (12 November 2021) Her Majesty's Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Jon Hills Ofsted Inspector Lea Hannam, lead inspector (10 November 2021 Ofsted Inspector 10 to 12 November 2021

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion