Other · Ofsted report
ROTHERHAM OPPORTUNITIES COLLEGE
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
12 Nov 2021
- Inspectorssingle source
Jacquie Brown
- Postcode verified
S60 2RR
- Name on report verified
Rotherham Opportunities College
- URN verified
147317
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Tutors’ feedback is not sufficiently useful and does not help students to identify what they need to do to improve their work. p.3
- This means that valuable learning time is often wasted, such as when students struggle to access the support that they need to log on to computers. p.2
- This means that students often do not know what they need to do next to improve further . p.3
- They make use of this information to determine which employers and providers they need to continue to liaise with in order to ensure good progression for future students. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes6
“Leaders do not have clear oversight of students’ progress.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 1,288
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Rotherham Opportunities College Monitoring visit report
p.1
Name of lead inspector: Jacquie Brown, Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.1
Inspection dates: 11 and 12 November 2021
p.1
Type of provider: Independent specialist college
p.1
Address: Brunswick Road Broom Rotherham South Yorkshire S60 2RR Monitoring visit: Rotherham Opportunities College, 11 and 12 November 2021
p.1
Context and focus of visit
From autumn 2019, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to independent specialist colleges newly Education and Skills Funding Agency-funded from August 2018 onwards. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the ‘Further education and skills inspection handbook’, especially the sections entitled ‘Monitoring visits’ and ‘Monitoring visits to providers that are newly directly publicly funded’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
Rotherham Opportunities College is an independent specialist college based in Rotherham. It provides programmes to students with high needs. At the time of the visit, there were 12 students enrolled on a bridging pathway, 10 on an employability pathway, nine on an opportunities pathway and six on a project search programme. All students are aged 19 to 25 years and have an education, health and care plan. There is no residential provision. Rotherham Opportunities College does not use any subcontractors.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders do not have effective oversight of the quality of the provision. Although they have carried out reviews of the quality of teaching in previous years, this has not resulted in sufficient improvement. Frequent changes to the senior leadership team have had a negative impact on leaders’ ability to provide effective oversight of the quality of provision.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders do not have clear oversight of students’ progress. They do not assure themselves that learners make expected progress in developing knowledge, skills and behaviours. Although tutors discuss the progress that students make in their sessions during staff meetings, no one provides an overview of students’ progress across their whole programme.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders do not ensure that teaching assistants make effective use of information that they provide about students when carrying out their roles. This means that valuable learning time is often wasted, such as when students struggle to access the support that they need to log on to computers. Monitoring visit: Rotherham Opportunities College, 11 and 12 November 2021 Leaders have a clear rationale for their provision. They have responded to a lack of appropriate educational opportunities for students aged 19 to 25 with high needs in Rotherham. They have worked closely with the local authority to provide programmes for students who do not wish to leave the borough for their education.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders provide appropriate curriculum pathways to enable students to develop the knowledge, skills and behaviours that they need as they become adults. For example, students develop their independent living skills and work-related skills through the opportunities and employability pathways.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Leaders monitor the destinations of their students on completion of their learning. They make use of this information to determine which employers and providers they need to continue to liaise with in order to ensure good progression for future students.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Leaders work with relevant partners to enhance the curriculum that they provide for students. For example, they work with Gulliver’s Theme Park and with a number of community and voluntary organisations to secure work placements for students.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Leaders employ tutors who are well qualified and appropriately experienced to work with students with high needs. However, they do not make sure that tutors and teaching assistants attend training to improve their understanding of working with students with specific disabilities. Tutors do not attend training to improve their teaching skills further.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Too many tutors do not identify students’ knowledge, skills and behaviours at the beginning of their programme. As a result, they do not plan individual programmes that take into account students’ starting points.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Too many tutors do not use the targets identified in students’ education, health and care plans well enough to plan learning activities. Tutors use accreditation as a focus for the curriculum, and all students complete the same units at the same time regardless of their prior knowledge, skills and behaviours. This means that students do not benefit from an individualised learning plan that is specific to their needs.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Most tutors do not monitor or record well enough the knowledge, skills and behaviours that students develop over time. They record when students have achieved learning outcomes, but they do not identify the valuable, small steps that students make to achieve these. This means that students often do not know what they need to do next to improve further . Monitoring visit: Rotherham Opportunities College, 11 and 12 November 2021 Tutors do not use assessment well enough to check what students have learned before moving on. Too often in lessons, tutors’ learning checks are cursory, which means that tutors do not know if students have understood what they have been taught. Tutors’ feedback is not sufficiently useful and does not help students to identify what they need to do to improve their work.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Although tutors accurately identify students’ starting points in English and mathematics, too many do not use this information well enough to improve students’ skills in these subjects. They do not provide effective enough support to students to improve their English and mathematical skills.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Most students work well together and are supportive and respectful of the staff and of their peers. However, some staff do not intervene quickly enough on the very small number of occasions when students’ behaviour is inappropriate.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Students benefit from useful independent careers advice, provided by a specialist careers provider. Careers advisers attend sessions and work with students to develop careers action plans which support students to make realistic decisions about their next steps.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Leaders do not ensure that students know about the risks of radicalisation and extremism. They do not teach students about these dangers, even though they are aware that their students are vulnerable and potentially at risk. Consequently, students do not have any understanding of how these risks might affect them in the communities in which they live.
p.4
Insufficient progress
The designated safeguarding lead has appropriate training to be effective in her role. She is supported by a deputy, who has completed relevant training. Leaders implement appropriate safeguarding policies and procedures with a clear reporting process in place.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Staff complete essential health and safety training which enables them to administer medication safely and give personal care to students.
p.4
Insufficient progress
The designated safeguarding lead ensures that staff record safeguarding concerns, and that appropriate action is taken. However, in a few instances, checks that the concerns have been recorded as ‘closed off’ are not completed. Monitoring visit: Rotherham Opportunities College, 11 and 12 November 2021 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Insufficient progress
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Insufficient progress
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Insufficient progress
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.5
Insufficient progress
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion