Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Lift Offa's Mead

Inspected 24 Nov 2021 · published 17 Jan 2022 · URN 138786

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sarah McGinnis

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    24 Nov 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sarah McGinnis

  • Postcode verified

    NP16 7DT

  • Name on report verified

    Offa's Mead Academy

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+44Positivemore positive than 79% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisesupportiveeffectivesuccessfullyeffectivelyproudsuccessfullovewarm
Criticismweaknesseserrorsnot yetgapsnot feel safe

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1204w+44
  • What needs to improve6w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,210
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 47
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
1
typical 8
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 96%What needs to improve 0%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Lisa Sharman Principal Offa's Mead Academy Beachley Road Sedbury Chepstow Gloucestershire NP16 7DT

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Offa's Mead Academy

Following my visit to your school on 23 and 24 November 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken since the school's previous monitoring inspection.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Offa's Mead Academy

The inspection was the fourth monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection that took place in December 2018. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The monitoring inspection report is attached.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Offa's Mead Academy

This was the second routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. I discussed the ongoing impact of the pandemic with you and have taken that into account in my evaluation.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Offa's Mead Academy

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

towards the removal of special measures.

p.1

Having considered the evidence, I strongly recommend that the school does

not seek to appoint early career teachers.

p.1

Having considered the evidence, I strongly recommend that the school does

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the Academies Enterprise Trust multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children's services for Gloucestershire . This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.1

Context

Since the previous monitoring visit, the school has made three new teaching staff appointments.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Leaders have maintained a relentless focus on introducing a revised curriculum, spanning from the early years foundation stage to Year 6. While some subjects are further ahead in development than others, pupils now follow all subjects of the national curriculum. This has been instrumental in improving the quality of education that pupils receive. Leaders have liaised extensively with external curriculum experts to ensure that continued improvement is sustainable. However, as this work is in its infancy, pupils are not yet able to demonstrate that they can retain important knowledge over the longer term. Leaders are developing the approach to assessment in the wider curriculum to check that this is so.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Curriculum plans are devised carefully to support pupils to learn important subject content in a logical order. This is underpinned by an emphasis on making sure that pupils understand key subject-specific vocabulary. This enables pupils to talk about what they have learned with confidence. Pupils say that they have enjoyed learning about ideas in greater depth. For example, pupils spoke knowledgably and enthusiastically about how rivers flow and about their research on the cracking of the Enigma code.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Trust leaders, governors and school leaders work together effectively. They remain uncompromising in their ambition for pupils at the school. Trust leaders have provided an objective viewpoint to evaluate whether leaders’ actions are leading to the improvements necessary. Governors are supportive but also pose effective challenge to school leaders. They have a comprehensive understanding of the work of the school. They are proud of the work that has been completed to date but are realistic and accurate in what is still left to do.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Staff say that workload is high because of the newly introduced curriculum but appreciate that this is necessary. They say leaders are supportive and have given them the training they need to familiarise themselves with the subject knowledge required. Subject leaders support their colleagues and check that the curriculum is put in place as intended.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Since the previous monitoring visit, leaders have revamped the teaching of early reading. There is now a well understood and consistent approach, which supports pupils to build up their understanding of phonics. Staff have had extensive training, which has given them the expertise they need. As a result, children in the early years and pupils in key stage 1 are becoming increasingly adept at identifying letters and the sounds that they make. Furthermore, the books pupils read are matched well to the sounds they are learning. Overall, this is a successful approach but there remain some pupils who still find reading a challenge. Leaders have used assessment well to identify where this is the case, so that further support can be provided.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Due to previous weaknesses, there remain gaps in key stage 2 pupils’ ability to construct sentences and in their understanding of phonics. The latter has contributed to the errors in spelling evident in pupils’ work. Pupils in Years 3 to 6 now have regular curriculum time to practise their use of phonics. Pupils recognise that this is helping them. There are early signs that pupils can identify for themselves where they have made spelling errors and correct them accordingly.

p.4

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Staff have successfully established a love of reading at the school. Pupils read both regularly as a class and independently. Pupils spoke spontaneously about the books they have read and make recommendations to others. Staff try to bring stories to life for pupils. For example, children in the Reception Year visited the forest to support their reading of ‘The Gruffalo’. Older pupils take responsibility for the new library as part of the ‘Book Worm’ club.

p.4

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities are cared for well. The support in place helps them to manage school life successfully. Staff provide a warm, nurturing environment, where pupils feel safe and valued. Support plans are now more specific to pupils’ academic needs. However, there is variability in how well strategies to support pupils’ needs are employed in the classroom.

p.4

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Staff are knowledgeable about pupils and their family situations. Where necessary, leaders work with external agencies to advocate for pupils who are vulnerable. Leaders’ strategies to promote the importance of attendance are beginning to pay dividends. Staff are also sensitive to the particular circumstances of children of armed services personnel. The family liaison officer provides an effective link with the nearby army barracks.

p.4

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

There are many positive conversations that happen, both in the classroom and in the corridor. Staff listen attentively to pupils. This gives pupils confidence to engage in conversation. Pupils take pride in the responsibility that staff give them. For example, pupils take an active part in many aspects of school life, such as eco-ambassadors and through involvement in the school council.

p.4

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Expectations of how pupils should behave towards each other are well established. Staff praise pupils routinely for what they have done well. Those pupils who need additional help to manage their emotions are given the support they need to do so. They are encouraged to reflect on how their actions have affected others.

p.4

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Staff expect pupils to be ‘big hearted’ towards one another. Pupils say that ‘everyone knows everyone’. This helps them, not only to feel safe, but also encourages them to watch out for each other. Pupils new to the school say that they were readily welcomed into the school community.

p.4

Additional support

Trust leaders have continued to work closely with school leaders. They have provided access to the resources and external expertise needed to support the teaching of reading and the development of the wider curriculum. Leaders work with ‘consultant headteachers’ from other schools within the trust who provide additional support and guidance.

p.5

Evidence

During the inspection, the inspector held meetings with the headteacher, other senior leaders and staff. The inspector also met with leaders from the multi-academy trust and the chair of governors. The inspector reviewed school documents, including curriculum plans and looked at examples of pupils’ work. The inspector visited lessons, met with groups of pupils and listened to pupils read with an adult.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion