Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
The Michael Tippett School
Summary
Andrew Wright (lead), Karen Matthews
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
11 Nov 2021
- Inspectors verified
Andrew Wright, Karen Matthews
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
SE24 0HZ
- Name on report verified
The Michael Tippett School
- URN verified
133442
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff are not trained well enough to identify concerns and help pupils who are not able to say what may be worrying them. p.3
- Leaders’ records of instances of poor behaviour do not explain enough about what led up to the concern. p.4
- Leaders’ capacity to improve the curriculum is weak because subject leadership is not strong. p.4
- Policies have been recently reviewed by interim leaders, but these have not yet been shared with staff and existing policies are ineffective. p.3
- Interim leaders do not know enough about the history and chronology of concerns related to pupils known to social care because they have not been able to gain access to all records. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Many pupils need to use communication aids to help them learn and make their views or concerns known, but staff lack expertise in supporting them to use these. p.4
- Leaders should urgently ensure that staff have the necessary guidance and training to identify safeguarding concerns and provide early help for pupils who find it hard to communicate verbally. p.4
- Pupils, who all have special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), have little opportunity to learn the things they need to make a success of the next stage of their education. p.2
- In some other subjects, such as personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education, leaders make sure teachers know what pupils should learn and remember. p.3
- Those responsible for safeguarding should obtain access to the full range of information and the steps that have been taken to reduce these risks. p.4
- Leaders and governors should ensure there is capacity to improve the content, sequencing and implementation of the curriculum so that the quality of p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,334
- about usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of The Michael Tippett School Heron Road, Herne Hill, London SE24 0HZ
p.1
Inspection dates: 10 and 11 November 2021
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Sixth-form provision Inadequate Previous inspection grade Good 10 and 11 November 2021
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The education pupils receive at this school is of a very poor standard. Staff do not have the necessary expertise to check if pupils, most of whom cannot communicate through speech, are feeling safe.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The curriculum has not been thought through properly. Pupils, who all have special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), have little opportunity to learn the things they need to make a success of the next stage of their education. Teachers do not all follow the agreed curriculum plans. Expectations of what pupils can achieve are low. However, pupils do enjoy the extra activities on offer, such as horse riding and yoga. These are intended to enrich pupils’ wider experiences.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils lose interest in lessons because they often cannot understand what staff want them to do. Not enough is done to find out whether pupils feel protected from bullying. Similarly, records of actions taken to improve pupils’ behaviour provide little information on how successful these actions have been.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Staff’s morale is low. They are concerned and confused about the school’s current situation. Those new to the school or new to teaching are particularly overwhelmed.
p.2
better?
The interim executive headteacher and interim head of school have accurately identified why the curriculum is weak in the short time they have been at the school. However, they have not had time to do anything about this. Leadership of subjects is underdeveloped, which means there is insufficient capacity to make the necessary improvements.
p.2
better?
Recently, there have been a number of changes to membership of the governing body. Governors are now finding out at first hand what the school is like. However, over time, they have not challenged and supported leaders from a well-informed position. The local authority is supporting interim leaders and governors to urgently improve the school.
p.2
better?
All pupils have an education, health and care plan (EHC plan). These are reviewed each year, but this process has not been overseen properly by senior leaders. Reviews are managed remotely by a member of staff who is not on site. This means valuable opportunities for establishing coherence between the curriculum and objectives in EHC plans are being missed.
p.2
better?
Pupils, including in the sixth form, do not learn or remember enough in subjects. For example, in mathematics, teachers do not use or choose resources well to support pupils to understand mathematical ideas. Teachers think up lessons in isolation, with little reference to curriculum plans. They do not direct other adults sufficiently. This means that pupils do not achieve well. 10 and 11 November 2021
p.2
3
Staff do not offer effective help to pupils who need communication devices to learn in English and other subjects. Some teachers are attempting to teach phonics to pupils but with limited skills and no focus on specific content. The school offered some remote education to pupils during the COVID-19 pandemic, though there is little evidence of a coherent approach to this.
p.3
3
Teachers’ explanation of lesson content can be confusing and inaccessible for pupils. When this happens, pupils’ behaviour deteriorates. Pupils’ EHC plans often refer to communication devices, but teachers do not consistently insist they are used or even taken to all lessons. Interim leaders are not content with the current arrangements to support pupils whose behaviour sometimes deteriorates rapidly. However, they have not had time to improve this or apply the revised behaviour policy they have drafted in response to their concerns.
p.3
3
In some other subjects, such as personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education, leaders make sure teachers know what pupils should learn and remember. Pupils understand what they are expected to achieve. This is helping them, for example, to understand how to form and maintain relationships with others.
p.3
3
Pupils have regular opportunities to interact with the wider community. For example, they do work in the nearby public gardens. Pupils and students in the sixth form learn to consider others, for example by organising a cake sale to raise money for charity.
p.3
3
Interim leaders have discovered that staff are concerned about their workload and conditions of employment, particularly the management of their contracts and the structure of the school day. They have made it a priority to listen to concerns and begin to tackle them.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Staff are not trained well enough to identify concerns and help pupils who are not able to say what may be worrying them. Policies have been recently reviewed by interim leaders, but these have not yet been shared with staff and existing policies are ineffective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Interim leaders do not know enough about the history and chronology of concerns related to pupils known to social care because they have not been able to gain access to all records.
p.3
Safeguarding
Interim leaders have ensured that shortcomings recently identified in checks on the suitability of staff have been rectified. Where checks on staff have not yet been received, interim leaders have put measures in place to assess and manage potential risks. 10 and 11 November 2021
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Leaders have not provided effective training to help staff pick up safeguarding concerns when pupils cannot speak about them. This means concerns may be getting missed. Leaders should urgently ensure that staff have the necessary guidance and training to identify safeguarding concerns and provide early help for pupils who find it hard to communicate verbally. Interim leaders have set about improving safeguarding policies and practice but still do not have access to all the information they need to evaluate safeguarding fully. Those responsible for safeguarding should obtain access to the full range of information and the steps that have been taken to reduce these risks. Leaders’ capacity to improve the curriculum is weak because subject leadership is not strong. Leaders and governors should ensure there is capacity to improve the content, sequencing and implementation of the curriculum so that the quality of
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
education becomes good. Many pupils need to use communication aids to help them learn and make their views or concerns known, but staff lack expertise in supporting them to use these. This means that pupils who need communication aids are disadvantaged compared to their classmates. Leaders should ensure staff have the skills and abilities to help pupils use the necessary equipment successfully. Leaders do not know enough about the outcomes of annual reviews of EHC plans. Teachers do not include enough opportunities for pupils to achieve objectives written into EHC plans in lessons. Leaders should obtain a secure oversight of the EHC annual review process and make sure teachers use objectives in plans to decide on the content and sequence of lessons. Leaders’ records of instances of poor behaviour do not explain enough about what led up to the concern. They do not allow leaders to check how well staff
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
have attempted to prevent these incidents becoming serious. Leaders should ensure that behaviour records are used well to improve both pupils’ behaviour and staff’s management of any incidents. Leaders and those responsible for governance may not appoint early career teachers before the next monitoring inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school. 10 and 11 November 2021
p.4
5
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.5
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 10 and 11 November 2021
p.5
sixth form
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.6
sixth form
Website http://tmts.me.uk Date of previous inspection 22 November 2017, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
Information about this school
At the time of this inspection, the substantive executive headteacher, the head of school and the school business manager were not in school. An assistant headteacher was also away. An interim executive headteacher and interim head of school were leading the school in their absence. There has recently been a major staff restructure. In the summer term, two assistant headteachers left the school. In the current term, the previous chair of the governing body and some other governors resigned. A new chair and vice- chair have been appointed, along with four new governors. All pupils in this school have SEND. Most have profound and multiple learning difficulties or severe learning difficulties. Some have autism spectrum disorder. 10 and 11 November 2021
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We deemed the inspection a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.7
Information about this inspection
In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures, because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school.
p.7
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with school leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation.
p.7
Information about this inspection
Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics and PSHE. During these, they sought pupils’ views, looked at pupils’ work, visited lessons, spoke with leaders about curriculum plans and held discussions with teachers. They also viewed curriculum plans in some other subjects. Meetings were held with the interim executive headteacher and interim head of school, the chair and vice-chair of the governing body and a representative of the local authority. Inspectors looked at records related to safeguarding and behaviour. They examined the records of checks leaders have made on the suitability of staff and sampled some staff’s files. Inspectors took into account responses to the online Ofsted Parent View questionnaire.
p.7
Inspection team
Andrew Wright, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Karen Matthews Ofsted Inspector 10 and 11 November 2021
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion