Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Childminder in Cambridgeshire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
8 Nov 2021
- URN verified
EY342565
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 353
- longer than usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills is leading Ofsted's work into how regulated early years and childcare providers in England have delivered child- centred practice and care, within the context of the restrictions placed on society during the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic.
p.1
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage (EYFS). If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 26 May 2021, we received concerns from another agency that suggested the provider was not meeting some of these requirements. We suspended the provider's registration because we believed children may be at risk of harm. Suspension allows time for the provider to take steps to reduce or eliminate the risk of harm to children. The provider has a right to appeal against a suspension.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 3 June 2021, we carried out a regulatory visit. The focus of the visit was to monitor the suspension notice. We found the provider was not meeting some of the EYFS requirements. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 7 July 2021, we took steps to cancel the provider's registration. The provider objected to us taking this step. Having heard the provider's reasons for objecting to this step, Ofsted has decided to proceed with cancellation. The provider has the right to appeal against our decision to an independent organisation, the First Tier Tribunal (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber).
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 1 November 2021, the provider appealed against suspension to an independent external tribunal, the Health, Education and Social Care First-tier Tribunal and it did not uphold the appeal.
p.1
Summary of outcome
Ofsted continue to proceed with cancellation.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements. We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.1
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion