Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Boreham Primary School

Inspected 3 Nov 2021 · published 14 Jan 2022 · URN 114937

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Kristian Hewitt (lead), Paula Masters

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    3 Nov 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Kristian Hewitt, Paula Masters

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    CM3 3DB

  • Name on report verified

    Boreham Primary School

  • URN verified

    114937

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2006.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−21Mixedmore positive than 8% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingfeel safethriveeffectivehigh expectationssafehappyrespectful
Criticismweaknessesnot alwaysinconsistencieslackconcernsnot good enoughweaknot consistently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1213w−27
  • Safeguarding109w+5
  • What needs to improve114w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,400
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 57, typical 56
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%Safeguarding 6%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 27%

Full report text

Inspection of Boreham Primary School Juniper Road, Boreham, Chelmsford, Essex CM3 3DB

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Outstanding

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

This school was last inspected 15 years ago and judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. This reflected the school’s overall effectiveness under the inspection framework in use at the time.

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

From then until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between inspections. Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last inspection. 2 and 3 November 2021

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Too many pupils do not achieve well enough in their education at Boreham Primary School. The curriculum pupils are taught is not fully established.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils feel safe and are happy to come to school. They are respectful to each other and to all adults they work with. Pupils talk positively about the importance of the school’s values, which include ‘care’ and ‘friendship’. Pupils understand how to show these values in the way they behave and act towards others.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The behaviour of pupils in lessons and around the school is good. There are very few reports of bullying. When, and if, bullying does happen, pupils say it is dealt with quickly. Pupils thrive on being praised by teachers in recognition for their hard work and good effort. This contributes towards pupils being keen to try hard and do their best.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy opportunities to take part in additional experiences that help their personal development. For example, they join in the wide range of after-school clubs and participate in themed events, such as the ‘online safety day’. Through their lessons and assemblies, pupils develop important personal qualities, such as resilience and independence.

p.2

better?

Leaders have not fully considered what knowledge pupils need to learn at all stages of their primary education. Leaders have reviewed some areas of the curriculum successfully, such as writing and mathematics. Other areas, such as early reading, have not been as well thought through to ensure leaders consider what pupils need to learn to achieve their best. It is not always clear what pupils should know, and by when. These factors lead to inconsistencies in how the curriculum is delivered across the school.

p.2

better?

Where weaknesses in the curriculum have been identified, leaders have not responded with enough urgency. While this is in part due to the pandemic, leaders’ actions have not been sufficiently rigorous to ensure the quality of education is good enough. As a result, some pupils are performing less well than other pupils in their age group.

p.2

better?

The reading curriculum is not planned clearly enough, and teachers have not received the training to be able to teach reading well. The teaching of phonics is not good enough because adults’ expectations are not consistently high. Some pupils are given books to practise reading that do not match the sounds they know and have been learning. This leaves gaps in pupils’ knowledge and delays their progress in being able to read fluently.

p.2

better?

The early years curriculum is not sufficiently ambitious. Leaders do not consider children’s starting points well enough. Staff lack the specialist knowledge to support 2 and 3 November 2021

p.2

3

children to learn well in the Reception Year. Curriculum plans do not clearly show the important knowledge children need for learning in Year 1 and beyond. While the curriculum has not been well thought through in many areas of learning, staff do provide effective support for children’s personal, social and emotional needs.

p.3

3

Support for the most vulnerable pupils is varied in quality. Where the work of the special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) is established, needs are well supported. Some teachers have less expertise to support identified needs, and this leads to less effective classroom provision. Disadvantaged pupils have additional help, but this is not planned precisely enough to ensure their needs are fully met.

p.3

3

Teachers have high expectations for behaviour. Classroom environments are calm, and playtimes are orderly and safe. Where pupils are not as interested in their learning, they are less focused. Nevertheless, there is little disruption to the learning of others.

p.3

3

Leaders are committed to supporting the personal development of pupils. This is a strength. Through their personal, social and health education (PSHE) lessons, pupils learn about healthy relationships with their peers and how to stay safe online. Adults in school help pupils to be aware of diversity in the world around them. Pupils learn about different cultures, faiths and communities. This helps promote the qualities of mutual respect and tolerance.

p.3

3

Leaders are considerate of staff’s workload and well-being. Staff are proud to be working in the school. They appreciate the support leaders provide, and this has been especially the case throughout the pandemic.

p.3

3

Governors’ activity to monitor the quality of education has been not been precise enough over time. Leaders’, including governors’, plans to improve the school do not have clear, measurable targets. This hinders the ability of leaders to review their work and know what difference it is making.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

There is a well-established culture of safeguarding in the school. Pupils feel safe and understand advice they are given to tell an adult if they have ‘a hurt body or hurt feelings’.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders regularly review practices in place to ensure a high standard of care. Staff are well trained and know about the different types of risks pupils could face. Clear systems are in place for staff to share concerns with leaders. Shared concerns are routinely acted upon to make sure children are kept safe. Leaders make good use of external services for advice and support where required. 2 and 3 November 2021

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leaders have not designed and implemented a curriculum that is fit for purpose from the early years through to Year 6. This has led to inconsistencies with how the curriculum is delivered across the school. Leaders should ensure that a suitable, well-considered curriculum is put in place so that staff know what should be taught in all subjects. Leaders should also make sure that staff are trained to deliver the planned curriculum effectively.  The school’s approach to early reading is only partially considered. Younger pupils in the school are not learning to read well enough to support their future learning. Leaders should ensure that early reading has a high priority in the school from the time that pupils enter Reception. They must ensure that all staff are well trained to teach phonics and early reading, and that pupils have access to books that they can use to build fluency.  Leaders lack ambition for learning in the early years. Children do not benefit from

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

meaningful learning across all areas of learning of the curriculum. They are not being prepared well enough for Year 1. Leaders should ensure that staff are well trained to know how younger children learn so children get off to a good start in their primary education.  Leaders have not been quick enough to respond to identified weaknesses in the school, including within the curriculum. Their plans to improve the school have lacked focus. This has had a negative impact on the learning of the youngest pupils. Leaders should ensure there are clearly identified priorities for improvement in the school development plan. These should detail specific and precise actions that can be measured.  Governors’ actions have not always focused on the right priorities that will make a difference to the quality of education. This has resulted in limited progress in areas of the curriculum identified as weak. Governors need to ensure their

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

expertise is used to rigorously monitor and check progress towards key priorities to secure school improvement.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted . 2 and 3 November 2021

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.5

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 2 and 3 November 2021

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.6

School details

Date of previous inspection 22 November 2006, under section 5

p.6

Information about this school

 Since the previous inspection, there have been a number of significant leadership and staffing changes, including, more recently, the appointment of a new deputy headteacher.  Boreham Primary School does not currently use any alternative provision for its pupils.  Out-of-school childcare overseen by the governing body is available on the school site.

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.6

Information about this inspection

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with school leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation. 2 and 3 November 2021

p.6

7

 Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher and deputy headteacher. Inspectors also met with the SENCo, school business manager and curriculum leaders for mathematics and early years.  Inspectors met with members of the governing body, including the chair and vice- chair.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in early reading, mathematics, computing and modern foreign languages. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, looked at curriculum plans, visited a sample of lessons where available, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors met with the designated safeguarding leader and discussed safeguarding with other staff and pupils.  Inspectors spoke to groups of pupils about their experiences of school life and their learning in lessons to understand what it is like to be a pupil in their school. Inspectors also observed the behaviour of pupils across the school site.

p.7

7

 A wide range of documentation was scrutinised during the inspection, including curriculum plans, school development plans and safeguarding and behaviour records.  Inspectors considered 80 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, and 80 free-text comments from parents. Inspectors also considered the 30 responses to Ofsted’s staff questionnaire and 28 responses to Ofsted’s pupil survey.

p.7

Inspection team

Kristian Hewitt, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Paula Masters Ofsted Inspector 2 and 3 November 2021

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion