Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Leeds Beckett University

Inspected 18 Nov 2021 · published 14 Jan 2022 · URN 133837

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ruth Stammers

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    18 Nov 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ruth Stammers

  • Postcode verified

    LS6 3QS

  • Name on report verified

    Leeds Beckett University

  • URN verified

    133837

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−44Criticalmore positive than 8% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectiverigoroussuccessfulfeel safeaccuratelysecure
Criticismweaknessesnot effectiveineffectivelacktoo slowconcernsdelayserrors

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,280
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 33, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Leeds Beckett University Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Ruth Stammers, Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.1

Inspection dates: 17 and 18 November 2021 Type of provider: Higher education institution

p.1

Address: City Campus Calverley Street Leeds LS6 3QS Monitoring visit: Leeds Beckett University, 17 and 18 November 2021

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by the Education and Skills Funding Agency and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the ‘Further education and skills inspection handbook’, especially the sections entitled ‘Monitoring visits’ and ‘Monitoring visits to providers that are newly directly publicly funded’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Leeds Beckett University provides a wide range of undergraduate and postgraduate programmes in a range of sectors. It has been training apprentices since 2017. Apprenticeship provision is offered in three schools within the university. They are the school of the built environment, engineering and computing, the school of health, and the Leeds Business School. The university subcontracts a small amount of training in functional skills English and mathematics to another provider.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

At the time of the visit, there were just under 1,000 apprentices in learning. Most apprentices study at level 6, with the higher enrolments in civil engineering, chartered surveyor, chartered manager and building services design engineer. Just under 100 apprentices study the level 5 nursing associate apprenticeship. At level 7, there were around 80 apprentices on programmes in senior leader, advanced clinical practitioner and chartered town planner. Apprentices make up around 4% of the university’s student population.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Senior leaders do not have a consistently effective approach to the development of apprenticeship provision. In the Leeds Business School, leaders develop a curriculum that meets the needs of employers and apprentices. However, in the other two schools where apprenticeships are provided, there is a lack of understanding of the principles and requirements of an apprenticeship. Consequently, these schools have not developed a curriculum beyond the degree programme. They are therefore not providing sufficient training for apprentices to develop their skills and behaviours.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Governance arrangements are not effective. Members of the apprenticeship board do not receive sufficient information about the apprenticeship programme. They are therefore unable to provide effective scrutiny and challenge. The board receives information about the numbers of apprentices who complete the degree element of Monitoring visit: Leeds Beckett University, 17 and 18 November 2021 the apprenticeship, but does not receive enough information about the number of apprentices who are still to complete their end-point assessments. Most level 6 civil engineering apprentices have not completed their apprenticeship on time. Plans for these apprentices to complete their programmes are ineffective.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Senior leaders work effectively with agencies such as Leeds City Council and the COVID-19 recovery task group. They use information from this liaison to determine the provision needed in the local area. The level 5 nursing associate apprenticeship has been developed in response to meeting healthcare needs in the region. The level 6 civil engineering apprenticeship is provided to meet the skills shortage of civil engineers nationally and internationally.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders have accurately identified most of the weaknesses in their apprenticeship provision and have plans to rectify most of the weaknesses. They now have a more rigorous recruitment process in order to reduce the number of apprentices who leave their programme early. However, leaders have been too slow to make improvements in a few areas where they have identified weaknesses in their provision, such as the significant delays to end-point assessments for civil engineering apprentices.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders do not coordinate on- and off-the-job training effectively. Staff at the university do not have enough awareness of what civil engineering apprentices do in their jobs. These apprentices are not supported to gain relevant experience at work to meet the requirements of the end-point assessment and the professional body accreditation. Level 5 nursing associate apprentices specialising in mental health or paediatrics follow the same curriculum as those on adult nursing. As a result, these apprentices do not gain the knowledge that they need to be successful in the workplace.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders do not identify well enough what apprentices already know and what they need to learn at the beginning of the apprenticeship. Level 6 civil engineering apprentices start the apprenticeship in year 2 if they already hold a relevant qualification. However, there is no modification to the curriculum for apprentices who already have significant experience in the sector. Level 7 senior leader apprentices complete an assessment of their knowledge, skills and behaviours at the start of the programme, but it is not revisited during the apprenticeship. Consequently, a few apprentices do not make the progress of which they are capable.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Apprentices gain new knowledge from the degree and master’s degree components of their apprenticeship. For example, level 6 civil engineers learn how to manually design drainage suds. This helps them to understand errors in software when designing drainage suds digitally at work. Level 7 senior leader apprentices learn Monitoring visit: Leeds Beckett University, 17 and 18 November 2021 how to lead innovative projects, including how to take appropriate strategic decisions.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Academic staff are highly qualified and have appropriate industry experience to deliver their academic subjects. On the level 7 senior leader programme, staff use their industry experience in both the public and private sectors to exemplify key concepts. However, new staff who are working specifically with apprentices have not carried out sufficient training to enable them to support apprentices to make sustained progress.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Apprentices feel safe. They know who to contact both in the workplace and at the university if they have any concerns. Apprentices value the support from staff, who considered their needs during the pandemic. Staff are sympathetic towards individual circumstances such as bereavement. This helps apprentices to remain on programme.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders have appropriate procedures in place for safeguarding and well-being referrals. They carefully monitor apprentices who self-refer for support. Apprentices who require support for their mental health can access a range of services at the university, such as trained counsellors and mentors. University staff signpost apprentices to external agencies that deal with specific issues, such as relationship counselling and debt management.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders provide training for apprentices on safeguarding and the ‘Prevent’ duty. However, as this training is only carried out at the start of the programme, most apprentices are unable to recall in detail what they learned. Monitoring visit: Leeds Beckett University, 17 and 18 November 2021 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Reasonable progress

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Reasonable progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion