Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Leybourne, St Peter and St Paul Church of England Primary Academy
Summary
Julie Sackett (lead), Gillian Lovatt-Young
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
3 Nov 2021
- Inspectors verified
Gillian Lovatt-Young, Julie Sackett
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
ME19 5HD
- Name on report verified
Leybourne, St Peter and St Paul Church of England Primary Academy
- URN verified
143987
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils’ positive attitudes to learning make a strong contribution to the school’s welcoming and hard-working atmosphere. p.3
- Strong relationships mean that pupils feel well cared for and safe. p.3
- However, Ofsted previously judged Leybourne, St Peter and St Paul Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School to be outstanding, before it opened as Leybourne, St Peter and St Paul Church of England Primary Academy as a result of conversion to academy status. p.1
- The school successfully promotes enjoyment of books from the moment children start school in Reception. p.2
- They feel very well supported by school leaders. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They know that leaders respond seriously to any concerns raised. p.3
- In the past, weaknesses in the foundation subjects meant that pupils learned less well in these subjects than in the core subjects. p.4
- Historic weaknesses in provision for pupils with SEND have led to underachievement for some pupils. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- For example, changes to subject plans in English and mathematics have ensured that teachers are clearer than they were previously about what they need to teach. p.2
- Occasionally a few pupils find it hard to listen as carefully as they should during lessons. p.3
- They rarely disturb others, but sometimes need a reminder from their teacher about what they should be doing. p.3
- Leaders should press ahead with plans to improve provision for pupils with SEND, including staff training to strengthen teachers’ understanding of pupils’ needs. p.4
- Leaders should provide the training and support needed to ensure that subject leaders develop their roles in monitoring the implementation and impact of the curriculum. p.4
- Leaders should review and improve the way the school communicates with parents. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance24
“They know that leaders respond seriously to any concerns raised.” p.3Behaviour4
“Pupils usually behave well.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,494
- longer than usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Leybourne, St Peter and St Paul Church of England Primary Academy Rectory Lane North, Leybourne, West Malling, Kent ME19 5HD
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Ofsted has not previously inspected Leybourne, St Peter and St Paul Church of England Primary Academy under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. However, Ofsted previously judged Leybourne, St Peter and St Paul Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School to be outstanding, before it opened as Leybourne, St Peter and St Paul Church of England Primary Academy as a result of conversion to academy status. Academy 2 and 3 November 2021
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The school’s values, which are love, respect, compassion and trust, provide a firm foundation for school life. Opportunities for reflection, such as collective worship, are a regular feature of the curriculum. These are used well to help pupils to develop their understanding of equality, justice and fair play. Pupils are kind and warm hearted. For example, during the inspection, some of the youngest children in the school explained that the school chickens were sad because the fox had been trying to get them, but were happy now that they were safe in their house.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enjoy school and are keen to do their best. They greet visitors warmly and politely. Teachers want pupils to do well, and most do so. Pupils usually behave well. Pupils understand how hurtful it can be if someone is being mean, and know what to do if this is happening. They have every confidence in their teachers to help if needed. Pupils who spoke with inspectors struggled to remember a case of bullying in school, but said that occasionally people could be thoughtless. The school’s behaviour records confirm this view. They show that leaders take suitable action when concerns are raised.
p.2
better?
Leaders have secured important improvements in the school’s curriculum since the current headteacher was appointed. For example, changes to subject plans in English and mathematics have ensured that teachers are clearer than they were previously about what they need to teach. As a result, teaching builds strongly on what pupils have learned before as they move up through the year groups. Improvements in these subjects have ensured that pupils continue to achieve well in reading, writing and mathematics.
p.2
better?
The school successfully promotes enjoyment of books from the moment children start school in Reception. Teachers read to pupils regularly and the well-stocked library provides an inviting place for pupils to enjoy books. During the inspection, pupils spoke with interest about the stories they were reading. The school’s phonics programme ensures that pupils quickly gain the knowledge and skills they need to become confident, fluent readers. Some pupils have fallen behind in their reading during the COVID-19 pandemic. Leaders know this and have prioritised extra help for these pupils in the coming months.
p.2
better?
Pupils learn how to use a range of resources to help them to complete mathematics tasks, such as division problems, successfully. They enjoy working on challenging tasks, talk proudly about what they have learned, and are understandably pleased with their progress.
p.2
better?
The foundation subjects are not as well developed as English and mathematics. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, leaders had developed secure plans for the teaching of Academy 2 and 3 November 2021
p.2
3
subjects such as history, geography and physical education (PE). However, the pandemic has delayed the implementation of improvements in the classroom.
p.3
3
Teachers use ongoing assessments well to check that pupils have retained what they have learned, and to identify and support those who need extra help. However, pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are not always supported well enough. Leaders have secured notable improvements in the quality of provision for pupils with SEND in recent months, and continue to prioritise this area of the school’s work.
p.3
3
Effective training provided by the trust prior to the COVID-19 pandemic has strengthened subject leaders’ understanding of the curriculum. However, subject leaders’ roles in monitoring how well subjects are taught, and its impact on pupils’ learning, have been hampered by the pandemic. They are keen to develop this aspect of their practice.
p.3
3
Pupils’ positive attitudes to learning make a strong contribution to the school’s welcoming and hard-working atmosphere. Occasionally a few pupils find it hard to listen as carefully as they should during lessons. They rarely disturb others, but sometimes need a reminder from their teacher about what they should be doing.
p.3
3
Leaders are currently reintroducing the school’s usual wide range of clubs, visits and visitors following the easing of COVID-19 restrictions. These enhance learning and help pupils to learn about different beliefs, cultures and religions. The school’s books and resources are carefully chosen to reflect and celebrate the United Kingdom’s diversity.
p.3
3
High staff morale reflects leaders’ success in developing strong teamwork and an atmosphere of mutual support. Staff are highly appreciative of changes made in the past few years to ensure a more manageable workload. They feel very well supported by school leaders.
p.3
3
Governors have an accurate view of the school’s work. The COVID-19 pandemic has made it more difficult for them to monitor the school’s work in the usual way. However, some activities continued, despite the COVID-19 restrictions. Governors are keen to re-establish their usual monitoring activities.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders make sure that everyone is knowledgeable about safeguarding procedures. Strong relationships mean that pupils feel well cared for and safe. Staff are very clear about what to do if they are worried about a pupil. They know that leaders respond seriously to any concerns raised.
p.3
Safeguarding
Safeguarding routines are part of everyday school life. This means that pupils can learn and play safely. For example, children in Reception routinely sanitise their Academy 2 and 3 November 2021
p.3
4
hands with antibacterial gel before choosing activities. The school’s personal development curriculum includes regular opportunities for pupils to learn how to stay safe.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In the past, weaknesses in the foundation subjects meant that pupils learned less well in these subjects than in the core subjects. Leaders had already begun work to improve curriculum plans in the foundation subjects prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. This has ensured that well-designed subject plans provide a firm framework for teaching. However, the pandemic frustrated leaders’ plans to implement these improvements in the classroom. Leaders should ensure that the revised curriculum plans are delivered consistently and effectively across the school. Historic weaknesses in provision for pupils with SEND have led to underachievement for some pupils. Leaders know that this has been a weaker aspect of the school’s work, and have been working hard to fix this. For example, the recently appointed special needs coordinator has established earlier and sharper identification of pupils with SEND. She and the family liaison officer make
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
sure that they are on hand to provide teachers and parents with advice and guidance. Some parents are understandably concerned about the quality of support for their children. However, others recognise marked improvements since the special needs coordinator was appointed. Leaders should press ahead with plans to improve provision for pupils with SEND, including staff training to strengthen teachers’ understanding of pupils’ needs. It is for this reason that the transitional arrangements have been applied. Subject leadership is at an early stage of development. Subject leaders have been unable to monitor the quality of teaching in their subjects of responsibility as fully as they would wish, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Leaders should provide the training and support needed to ensure that subject leaders develop their roles in monitoring the implementation and impact of the curriculum. Some parents are dissatisfied with the quality of communication from the school.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Leaders are aware that this has been a difficulty in the past, and have taken steps to improve this aspect of the school’s work in the past year. For example: they are currently updating the school’s website; the early years newsletter provides valuable information about what children will be learning; and the special needs coordinator is making sure that the parents of children with SEND receive timely information. However, there is clearly more to be done to ensure that all parents feel well informed and confident about the school’s work. Leaders should review and improve the way the school communicates with parents. Academy 2 and 3 November 2021
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.5
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. Academy 2 and 3 November 2021
p.5
School details
Inspection number 10199300 Type of school Primary
p.6
School details
Chair of governing body Jacqueline Evans
p.6
School details
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.6
Information about this school
The school does not currently use alternative provision. The last section 48 inspection took place in 2017. The next section 48 inspection is due soon, and leaders have made arrangements for this to take place in due course. The school has a breakfast club, which is open to pupils who attend the school and is managed by the governing body.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with school leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation. Inspectors met with the headteacher and other senior leaders. They also spoke with three governors, including the chair of governors, and spoke with the trust’s director of primary education and the chief executive officer. Academy 2 and 3 November 2021
p.6
7
Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics, history and PE. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, looked at curriculum plans, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with teachers, held a discussion with some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of their work. Inspectors reviewed a range of safeguarding records and documents, including the single central register. They also met with the designated safeguarding lead, reviewed the school’s safeguarding records and spoke with a group of pupils.
p.7
Inspection team
Julie Sackett, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Gillian Lovatt-Young Ofsted Inspector Academy 2 and 3 November 2021
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion