Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)

Childminder in Kent

Inspected 2 Dec 2021 · published 11 Jan 2022 · URN EY538489

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    2 Dec 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Sara Garrity

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Not met

  • Previous overall verified

    Not met

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder report

  • URN verified

    EY538489

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.

  • OverallNot met

10% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Not met (3,163 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−35Criticalmore positive than 42% of reports of this type graded Not met
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Not met.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progressconsistentlyclear
Criticismnot metnot effectiveconcernsdoes not knownot confidently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings6w−50
  • What needs to improve301w−22

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
301
shorter than usual (typical 401)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 46
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 1%What needs to improve 41%About the inspection 59%

Full report text

Not met (with actions)

Previous inspection Not Met (with actions)

p.1

This provision does not meet requirements

n Safeguarding is not effective. The childminder has not addressed the actions raised at her last inspection to update her safeguarding training. The childminder cannot confidently explain the signs of abuse, including wider safeguarding concerns such as radicalisation. She is not aware of the relevant agencies to contact if she were concerned about a child in her care. n The childminder has not updated her written safeguarding policy in line with the requirements of the childcare registers. She is not aware of the relevant agencies to contact were she to be concerned about a child's safety and welfare. n The childminder does not have public liability insurance and has not maintained a valid first-aid qualification as required. n The childminder has not undertaken appropriate professional development to update her knowledge and understanding of how children and babies learn and develop. As a result, she does not know how to offer children a varied

p.2

This provision does not meet requirements

curriculum and provide them with quality teaching experiences to support them to make good progress. n Partnerships with parents are important to the childminder and she has a clear understanding of how to work with parents to provide a continuity of care. n The childminder consistently assesses risks in the home to help maintain children safety.

p.2

This provision does not meet requirements

There were no children in the early years age range present when this inspection took place. The findings in this report are based on evidence gathered from discussions with those who care for the children and an inspection of the premises, equipment and relevant documentation. Where there are no early years children present, no judgement is made on the quality of the early years provision as there is no reliable evidence on which to assess its impact on children. The report states whether the provider continues to meet the requirements of registration.

p.2

Setting details

Unique reference number EY538489 Local authority Kent Inspection number 10193799 Type of provision Childminder

p.3

Registers

Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder

p.3

inspection

Total number of places 5 Number of children on roll 0 Date of previous inspection 1 April 2019

p.3

Information about this early years setting

The childminder registered in 2016 and lives in Pembury, Tunbridge Wells, Kent. She works each weekday, all year round.

p.3

Inspection activities

n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n The inspector held discussions with the childminder to ascertain her understanding of the safeguarding and welfare requirements. n The childminder took the inspector on a tour of the home and explained how she risk assessed the areas used for childminding in relation to health and safety. n The inspector discussed with the childminder how they would work with parents to develop positive relationships, to meet children's individual care needs. n The inspector held discussions with the childminder in relation to professional development.

p.3

Inspection activities

2 December 2021 We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.3

Inspection activities

2 December 2021 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.5

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion