Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Whitehorse Manor Infant School

Inspected 13 Oct 2021 · URN 136564

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Ruth Dollner (lead), Jonathan Newby, Kanwaljit Singh

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Oct 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Jonathan Newby, Kanwaljit Singh, Ruth Dollner

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    CR7 8SB

  • Name on report verified

    Whitehorse Manor Infant School

  • URN verified

    136564

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+45Positivemore positive than 85% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyambitiouseffectiveoutstandingvery wellpositivesuccessfullyconfident
Criticismweakerconcernsstrugglelacknot alwaysnot effectivelynot skillednot accurate

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1256w+44
  • Safeguarding118w+23
  • What needs to improve126w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,464
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 58, typical 56
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%Safeguarding 6%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

Inspection of Whitehorse Manor Infant School Whitehorse Road, Thornton Heath, Surrey CR7 8SB

p.1

Inspection dates: 12 and 13 October 2021

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

Ofsted has not previously inspected Whitehorse Manor Infant School under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. However, Ofsted previously judged Whitehorse Manor Infant School to be outstanding before it opened as an academy. From then until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspections, so there has been a longer gap than usual between inspections.

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened in Whitehorse Manor Infant School’s effectiveness before and after it converted to academy status. 12 and 13 October 2021

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy attending Whitehorse Manor Infant School. Staff know pupils very well. Pupils are safe and cared for. Staff and pupils develop positive relationships as part of the community of ‘Pegasus People’. Staff help pupils to put the Pegasus’ values into practice, such as caring for each other and celebrating achievements. Pupils behave well and only occasionally lose focus in lessons. Pupils do not experience bullying at this school. Teachers help them to resolve any minor disagreements quickly.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy a broad range of experiences in school. They have lots of after-school clubs to choose from. They enjoy the trips that are planned to bring the curriculum to life, such as visits to Hampton Court.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils show resilience and are keen to learn. Leaders and staff are ambitious for pupils and what they want pupils to learn. However, some pupils do not receive enough support to help them access the curriculum successfully. This is particularly the case for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy the stories and books that adults share with them. However, the reading curriculum does not help all pupils build up their phonics knowledge and use this when reading. This means that some weaker readers struggle to develop accuracy or fluency in their reading.

p.2

better?

Leaders and staff want the best for pupils in every respect. A broad curriculum is in place. Leaders have created logically sequenced plans in most subjects, including mathematics, science, history and geography. In the early years, the curriculum is well sequenced and is themed around stories and books. This helps children to develop a love of stories and poetry.

p.2

better?

However, teaching of the curriculum is not helping all pupils across the school to learn, remember and build on their knowledge in all subjects. Leaders have not worked together effectively to make sure that some lower-attaining pupils, or those with SEND, can access the curriculum. Teachers have not routinely received support with providing work that builds on what these pupils know and can do.

p.2

better?

Reading is a clear priority in the school. However, the reading curriculum does not help all pupils to make progress. Assessments undertaken in the early years are not fully taken account of when pupils move to Year 1. Teachers do not use assessment well to adapt the new phonics programme and ensure that teaching is at the right level for all pupils. This inhibits the progress pupils make in learning to read.

p.2

better?

Leaders have invested in appropriate reading resources and books. These match well to the phonics programme that they have implemented. However, some 12 and 13 October 2021

p.2

3

teachers are not skilled in matching books to pupils’ phonics knowledge. This means that weaker readers, including some pupils with SEND, struggle to apply their phonics skills and read accurately.

p.3

3

Pupils who are struggling to read receive extra help. However, catch-up sessions do not relate precisely enough to the most important knowledge or skills that pupils need to catch up on. Not all adults have the expertise in teaching pupils at the very earliest stages of reading. Leaders have not monitored the quality or impact of these sessions accurately.

p.3

3

Pupils behave well. Right from the start in the early years, adults support children in learning how to communicate well. This helps children to learn and play together. These positive attitudes to learning and to each other develop across the school. Playtimes are fun and pupils enjoy the activities on offer. Any minor conflicts are sorted out swiftly. Pupils are resilient and they try hard. However, sometimes pupils lose focus in lessons. This is usually when their work is too difficult and does not build on what they already know.

p.3

3

Leaders and staff work hard to promote the personal development of pupils. Pupils’ achievements are celebrated. Pupils faces lit up during the inspection when they were given stickers for doing well, and when they talked about how proud they were to be school councillors. Pupils are tolerant and respectful and show that they know the difference between right and wrong.

p.3

3

Leaders, trustees and members of the local academy council are mindful of staff workload and considerate of staff well-being. Staff feel valued and supported. They appreciate the training they receive from leaders within the school and across the trust. However, staff have not received training on how to adapt their teaching to make sure that pupils with SEND and lower-attaining pupils fully access the curriculum.

p.3

3

Trustees and the school’s local academy council check the work of leaders and support their work. However, they do not have an entirely accurate view on the quality of education provided. They have not held leaders to account in enough depth to understand how well the curriculum is being taught, particularly in reading and for those pupils with SEND.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders and staff keep a watchful eye on the safety and well-being of their pupils. They have a detailed knowledge of their most vulnerable families. Training ensures that staff have a clear understanding of potential risks to children.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders respond swiftly and effectively to any concerns raised by staff. Leaders are relentless in pursuing the right support for their pupils from outside agencies. 12 and 13 October 2021

p.3

4

The curriculum is effective in helping pupils understand how to keep themselves safe, including when online. Pupils trust staff and know they will be listened to if they have any concerns.

p.4

4

Leaders make sure that all relevant checks are made when staff are recruited.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Curriculum plans are ambitious and logically sequenced. However, in practice, teaching of the curriculum does not ensure that all pupils, including those with SEND, develop the knowledge mapped out in curriculum plans. Leaders need to make clear how teachers and staff can make adaptations and ensure that all pupils learn successfully. This includes providing staff with effective guidance and training on how to help all pupils build well on their prior learning, including in reading.  Staff worked hard to implement a new phonics programme at the start of the year. The programme does not enable all pupils to learn to read as quickly as possible. Pupils in each year group are taught the same sounds at the same time, irrespective of their existing phonics knowledge. Some staff lack the expertise to select suitable reading books and help those pupils who need to catch up. Leaders need to review the phonics programme so that all pupils build up their

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

phonics knowledge securely. Training for staff has begun but not been completed. Leaders should make sure that all staff have the expertise to support pupils’ development as confident, fluent readers.  Teachers value the training they have received from leaders. Further training to help them adapt teaching and to match texts to pupils’ phonic knowledge is now needed. Additional catch-up sessions are not always taught by staff who are confident in teaching phonics and early reading. This needs to be reviewed by leaders so that lower-attaining pupils and those with SEND receive the help they need to learn and achieve well.  Leaders at all levels have worked hard to implement a revised curriculum. However, leaders and members of the academy council do not have an accurate view of the impact of this curriculum on all pupils. Leaders’ monitoring and evaluation activities need to focus more precisely on this.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection. 12 and 13 October 2021

p.4

5

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.5

5

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.5

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.5

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 12 and 13 October 2021

p.5

School details

Inspection number 10199379 Type of school Infant

p.6

School details

Headteacher Sharon Russell (Head of School)

p.6

School details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.6

Information about this school

 The school has converted to academy status since the time of its previous inspection in 2007.  Three classes are housed on an additional site at 129–133 Brigstock Road, Thornton Heath CR7 7JN.  The school does not use any alternative provision.

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.6

Information about this inspection

This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with school leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors held meetings with the executive headteacher, head of school, head of site, deputy headteacher and other senior leaders. Inspectors met with members 12 and 13 October 2021

p.6

7

of the board of trustees, including the local authority representative. An inspector held a virtual meeting with the local academy board.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, history and geography. For each deep dive, inspectors spoke with curriculum leaders, looked at subject plans and visited lessons. Inspectors held discussions with pupils and looked at their work. Inspectors also looked at the plans and spoke with leaders about some other curriculum subjects.  Inspectors checked the single central record of staff suitability. Inspectors met with leaders responsible for safeguarding. Inspectors reviewed case records and other safeguarding documentation.  Inspectors held meetings with groups of pupils. They spoke with pupils informally during breaktimes and lunchtimes.  Inspectors met with groups of staff and also reviewed the responses to the survey for staff.

p.7

7

 Inspectors met with parents at the start of the day. Inspectors reviewed the 12 responses to Ofsted Parent View, and eight written comments.

p.7

Inspection team

Ruth Dollner, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Kanwaljit Singh Ofsted Inspector 12 and 13 October 2021

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion